Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Statistical contingency fuel

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Statistical contingency fuel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jun 2019, 08:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Mordor
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Statistical contingency fuel

Hi guys, I am looking for some literature on statistical contingency fuel. I already have the ICAO FPFM manual, but looking for other sources how to establish such a system, preferably in EASA regulatory framework.

Also, would be very happy to get some practical information on how it works, insights from
you airlines, pros and cons and how it compares to other methods, eg. 3%...

Kind regards,

SnR
Sidestick_n_Rudder is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2019, 10:51
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austria
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
What is the expected benefit of such a calculation? It has a faint smell of a financial departments attempt at cost savings by way of finding another way of cutting down the required min.block fuel.

But just for the fun of it, let us assume a flight from A to B and let it be operated by the same aircraft once every day of the year. The Min.block will not be the same for every flight, it will depend on meteorological conditions, the choice of alternate, the aircrafts weight and so on. But there will be an average burn, lower on days with low traffic or with favourable wind conditions, higher on days with nasty weather, slots, holdings and so on. On many flights, the cont. fuel will not be touched at all, on others, it will not be sufficient by far.

Now, what contingency fuel is to be included in the Min.block? The average over all flights, bringing the contingency fuel close to 0? The average, but no less than 3% or 5%? There is no saving in this, and this is already covered by allowing commanders to select a suitable amount of extra fuel and, company dependent, compulsory additional fuel. The maximum used over the considered timeframe? This is hardly an economic and reasonable choice...

Flying with the lowest possible amount of fuel does not always save costs to the company but has the potential to cause additional losses due to missed connections, unnecessary diversions and so on. This is what is often forgotten by companies.
Tu.114 is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2019, 19:33
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: FL390
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We've had it for a few years. Works really well.
Fursty Ferret is online now  
Old 23rd Jun 2019, 19:44
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Mordor
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fursty Ferret
We've had it for a few years. Works really well.
Hii Fursty!

Good to hear it works. May I know what coverage you’re using? 95%, 99%?

How statistical contingency amounts compare to traditional 5%CF?

Cheers,

SnR
Sidestick_n_Rudder is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.