Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A321 Flap mis-selection

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A321 Flap mis-selection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jan 2019, 12:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A321 Flap mis-selection

A321. Scenario:
-Flap 2/Gear Down.
-A/P, A/T, F/D on
-Localiser established, about to capture Glide
-Flaps 3 called for

Inadvertently colleague selects Flaps 1

What happens?




Sidestick_flyer001 is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2019, 13:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Mordor
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing will happen. F speed is more or less the same as Vls Conf1. If A/THR engaged/speed managed, it will automatically command speed to S speed.
Sidestick_n_Rudder is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2019, 23:56
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This actually happened. Speed was around 160kts and thrust suddenly started to gradually increase, as did the speed. The glide had just been captured and I attributed the increase in thrust to the selection of Flap 3 whilst still not fully in a 3 degree profile. When speed increased to about 170 kts, towards 180kts (S Speed), I knew something was wrong and instinctively disconnected A/P and A/T. Simultaneously my colleague noticed his mistake and reselected Flap 3. Throughout these few seconds, i'm pretty sure that Vapp bug was still visible (there was certainly no bug at S Speed), and VLS did not seem to increase, and my intention was to bring the speed back down to Vapp. My question is, had my colleague not noticed his mistake, and I manually brought the speed towards Vapp. whilst Flaps were retracting towards position 1, VLS should simultaneously increase, shouldn't it?
Sidestick_flyer001 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2019, 08:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N5109.2W10.5
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
whilst Flaps were retracting towards position 1, VLS should simultaneously increase, shouldn't it?
Yes - but by less than you think.
If you perform an overweight GA from CONF Flaps 3 to CONF 1+F, the VLS only seems to increase by about 5 kts.
Goldenrivett is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2019, 09:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Doha
Age: 13
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does you SOPs not say that PF request Flaps 3 and PM checks that speed is below VFE next, moves the flap handle to Flaps 3 and says “Flaps 3” AFTER they have seen Flaps 3 in BLUE under the flaps display in order to confirm they have selected the correct flap setting ?
Black Pudding is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2019, 16:14
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Black Pudding
Does you SOPs not say that PF request Flaps 3 and PM checks that speed is below VFE next, moves the flap handle to Flaps 3 and says “Flaps 3” AFTER they have seen Flaps 3 in BLUE under the flaps display in order to confirm they have selected the correct flap setting ?
Indeed that is the procedure. Lessons learnt I suppose.
Sidestick_flyer001 is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2019, 16:39
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: FLSomething
Posts: 404
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Black Pudding
Does you SOPs not say that PF request Flaps 3 and PM checks that speed is below VFE next, moves the flap handle to Flaps 3 and says “Flaps 3” AFTER they have seen Flaps 3 in BLUE under the flaps display in order to confirm they have selected the correct flap setting ?
Of course the SOPs would, but blindly quoting rules at someone who has made a slip is exactly the attitude that stops people filing safety reports because they think they’ll be seen as stupid, as opposed to someone who has made an honest mistake and wants to learn from it...



VariablePitchP is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2019, 16:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Been there - done that. I was 6 months into my career and beginning to feel comfortable... We were in the slot; Descent and approach had gone swimmingly so far, and workload was really rather low.

We were sitting at about 160kts on the glide path with managed speed the target. On F3 selection, the thrust came on as S became the target. With no obvious reason behind it - we were concerned about over speeding Vfe conf 3. My partner intervened by closing the thrust levers and disconnecting ATHR, but by that time the energy was all too much. We went around. When he said “GA - flaps”, I thought it was strange that the flap lever was at 1, and decided i’d best not move it. It did not occur to me, however, that it must have been me that put it there...

Neither of us picked up the error at the time. Downwind, after the subsequent missed approach, we put two and two together. The upshot from the wash up on the ground, and the subsequent phone call from the office, was the same as “effects of controls 2” - that is “Limitation, Opeation, Indication.”

I wont forget that one.
Smokey Lomcevak is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2019, 17:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Doha
Age: 13
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
VariablePitchP

On Airbus, you have no idea what flap setting have been selected by feel of the flap handle alone without checking the blue number or full display. Even when PF and I ask for flaps, I check the blue number or full to make sure my PM has not made an error.





Last edited by Black Pudding; 30th Jan 2019 at 07:26.
Black Pudding is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2019, 20:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Middle England
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The flap handle is in the wrong place on the Airbus. It is not in the peripheral vision of the pilot flying.

Black Pudding....your company needs to Google "Just Culture".
763 jock is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2019, 21:17
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: United States of Europe
Age: 40
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Goldenrivett
Yes - but by less than you think.
If you perform an overweight GA from CONF Flaps 3 to CONF 1+F, the VLS only seems to increase by about 5 kts.
That’s because the defintion of Vls in this case changes from 1.23Vs1g to 1.13 Vs1g.
OPEN DES is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2019, 22:04
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N5109.2W10.5
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That’s because the definition of Vls in this case changes from 1.23Vs1g to 1.13 Vs1g.
I don't think so.
From FCOM DSC-22_10-50-20 Definition of VLS,
"VLS:Lowest Selectable Speed.

Represented by the top of an amber strip along the airspeed scale on the PFD.
Computed by the FAC, based on FMS, and corresponds to 1.13 VS during takeoff, or following a touch and go
Becomes 1.23 VS, after retraction of one step of flaps.
Becomes 1.28 VS, when in clean configuration."

Doesn't mention a GA. Apparently - you need wheels on the ground to trigger 1.13 VS1g logic.
Goldenrivett is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 07:57
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,493
Received 101 Likes on 61 Posts
Many years’ ago I was PM and exactly as the OP scenario, I selected F1 instead of the F3 requested as we were on the ILS into Bodrum.

The A/THR increased thrust - quite a lot - and PF went around. Once gear was up and we were safe, Capt says ‘what happened?’, ‘ Sorry, I cocked up’ says I. ‘OK no problem’ says he, adding with a smile ‘don’t do it again !’

I don’t know why I moved the lever the wrong way - probably tired or distracted; I think cabin secure was very late and I was answering their call - but that is the only time before or since that I ever did that. Point is, we all make mistakes and it is how we manage and catch the mistakes that counts. Capt did exactly the right thing and was decent about my mistake

@ 763 at the risk of opening a big can of worms, the place to see your config in Airbus is on the E/WD config graphic, so the flap lever does not need to be in one’s peripheral vision
Uplinker is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2019, 09:34
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: FL390
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The flap handle is in the wrong place on the Airbus. It is not in the peripheral vision of the pilot flying.
Oh yeah, as opposed to the design that requires PF to take their hand of the thrust levers so that PM can reach awkwardly around the binnacle to get at the flap lever and try to move it accurately to one of about 40 settings. Or does Boeing still work on the assumption that the pilot in the right hand seat never actually flies the aircraft?
Fursty Ferret is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2019, 14:33
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't mention a GA. Apparently - you need wheels on the ground to trigger 1.13 VS1g logic.
Goldenrivett, No it dosen't. 1.13 or 1.23 has nothing to do with on ground. It is a matter of meeting a minimum go around speed certification requirement while improving go around performance. Below from FCTM:-

If a go-around CONF 1+F is carried out following an approach CONF 3, VLS CONF 1+F may be higher than VLS CONF 3 +5 kt. The recommendation in such a case is to follow SRS orders which will accelerate the aircraft up to the displayed VLS. It should be noted, however, that VLS CONF 1+F equates to 1.23 VS1G whereas the minimum go-around speed required by regulations is 1.13 VS1G. This requirement is always satisfied.

Last edited by vilas; 2nd Feb 2019 at 05:23.
vilas is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2019, 09:16
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: 🇬🇧🇪🇸
Posts: 2,097
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Our Company has had several Flap/Gear miselections. The risk is now mitigated by introducing a short pause by the PM between placing his/her hand and the lever and actually moving it. This gives time for both the PM to think what he/she is about to do and the PF to spot the wrong lever is about to be moved. Seems to work nicely.
Nightstop is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2019, 08:36
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N5109.2W10.5
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No it dosen't. 1.13 or 1.23 has nothing to do with on ground.
vilas, How does the aircraft know when it is in TOGA from Flight phase 7 (approach - 1.23 VS, after retraction of one step of flaps) or TOGA from phase 8 (Computed by the FAC, based on FMS, and corresponds to 1.13 VS during touch and go)?
If it has nothing to do with on ground logic - then please explain.

Last edited by Goldenrivett; 3rd Feb 2019 at 13:51.
Goldenrivett is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2019, 12:07
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Golden
The switch from one ratio to another is not always mentioned. Like when you move the flap lever to 1 from zero the VLS changes even with flap slat jammed at zero because the lever position changes the ratio of VLS from 1.28 to 1.23.
vilas is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2019, 13:46
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: In a house
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With all automation still in managed the aircraft will command S speed when flap is selected back to flap 1. The real danger is if auto thrust is not engaged and the mis selection is unnoticed. Always a good idea to follow SOP and company procedures to avoid these problems.
flyingmed is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2019, 04:37
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Asia
Age: 49
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vilas
Golden
The switch from one ratio to another is not always mentioned. Like when you move the flap lever to 1 from zero the VLS changes even with flap slat jammed at zero because the lever position changes the ratio of VLS from 1.28 to 1.23.
wow so thats why we set Flaps lever to one in that failure!
MD83FO is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.