Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Mandatory Altitude Jepp Chart

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Mandatory Altitude Jepp Chart

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jul 2020, 21:44
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Amantido
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brain fart, sorry! I should have said you can be at or above the level segment depicted on the chart but the FAF shall be crossed at the mandatory altitude.
Banana Joe is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2020, 21:46
  #22 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Pilot should actually have 2000 at FAF. The "mandatory" label which instructs you to be exactly at 2000 for the full intermediate approach segment (pointed out by Vessbot) had been added by Jeppesen.

Last edited by FlightDetent; 8th Jul 2020 at 10:01.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2020, 12:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Zulu Time Zone
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to the Jeppesen chart guide the bold altitude specifically refers to the altitude at FAF/FAP (as opposed to the colloquial platform altitude).

The Lido plate is more clear. The Jepp way of doing things is ambiguous in this case but the mandatory altitude at the FAF/FAP is not in doubt either way.



oggers is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2020, 22:48
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FlightDetent
Pilot should actually have 2000 at FAF. The "mandatory" label which instructs you to be exactly at 2000 for the full intermediate approach segment (pointed out by Vessbot) had been added by Jeppesen.
The "mandatory" label doesn't instruct anything about the segment before the fix, it's about the fix itself. And it's not "added by Jeppesen" as in Jeppesen invented it, it's there because the source data says to, unless it's a charting error. It's simply Jeppesen's presentation of a mandatory (instead of minimum, which is the common one) altitude, equivalent to the 5500 here, from FAA AeroNav charts:



A Jepp altitude with no note (#4 in Oggers' post above) is equivalent to the 2500 here, and is the common one (minimum, aka "at or above")
Vessbot is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2020, 06:30
  #25 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Thanks for correcting. I meant J. put it there on their own will (charting error), but that is also not true. The restriction is actually visible in the LIDO graphics too.

Had a look last night for the Egyptian AIP, despite some improvements in the Internet realm it is not accessible online.

Then I had it slip away, apologies.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2020, 21:40
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middle East
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only reason for having "mandatory" heights depicted on letdown chart is to free the space above..
Jeppesen is a copy company and does not design approach charts, the state does..
I suspect it is a design error by the state but you have to comply with it. You should cross 12d at 2500 ft & 7.4d at 2000 ft.....
Rocket3837 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.