Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A321 NEO LR Range Performance

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A321 NEO LR Range Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st May 2018, 18:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Paris
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A321 NEO LR Range Performance

Hi everyone,

We see more and more articles about the A321 NEO LR and the potential new transatlantic routes.

Recently we had the 4109 NM flight of the A321 NEO LR prototype from SEZ to TLS (4750 NM Air Distance). Airbus said it was with 160 dummies passengers + 11 flights crew and technicians.

Primera Air is the first airline operating the A321 NEO LR, they have a cabin configuration as below :
16J
182Y
Which is more or less 20 Tonnes payload.

What in real world operations should be the max route range for the A321 NEO LR with a 20 Tonnes payload (and indeed 3 ACTs)?
3600NM?
3800 NM?
4000 NM?
More?

Thanks for your feedback.
A380MSN0001 is offline  
Old 21st May 2018, 18:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: away from home
Posts: 891
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A321LR will not carry 200 pax (20t) and fuel for 3 ACT´s. You will have to reduce either the fuel or the payload. A lot depends on the actual OEW of the operator. Is it bare bones? With limited catering? or is it J and Y? I am not sure Primera Air will carry regular J (lie flat) seats. Perhaps similar to US domestic first class. There is not enough real estate for 16 lie-flats and 182Y. So your hypothetical config will probably be either payload limited or fuel limited. If you choose the 20t payload, the range will probably be right around 3000nm (+resereves).
The optimum configuration will probably be 2 ACT´s, and around 180 pax. It will take a premium heavy and high yielding (not LCC) route to optimise for 3 ACT´s and around 160 seats to reach maximum range.
oceancrosser is online now  
Old 21st May 2018, 22:10
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Paris
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've just checked the Primera website. They promote the following :
16 Premium
182 Economy

No lieflat so far.

So with 3 ACTs => 3600 NM + reserves at 160 pax seems the max range?
A380MSN0001 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2018, 10:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: France
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by A380MSN0001

Primera Air is the first airline operating the A321 NEO LR, they have a cabin configuration as below :
16J
182Y
Which is more or less 20 Tonnes payload.
To be more precise, Primera does not operate the LR right now as the type wont be delivered before the end of the year.
Howvere, it seems (read in another thread) that operations STN-EWR go smooth without diversions on the NEO (non LR).
rouelan is offline  
Old 22nd May 2018, 13:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: on the beach
Age: 68
Posts: 2,027
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've just checked the Primera website. They promote the following :
16 Premium
182 Economy
Primera are promoting lots at the moment, don't believe what they say until the aircraft is on the gate!
Evanelpus is offline  
Old 22nd May 2018, 14:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A sharklet 321ceo with 200 pax will fly seven hours thirty minutes block with two ACT according to my logbook. The Neo version will obviously be more economical
tubby linton is offline  
Old 22nd May 2018, 16:12
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Paris
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tubby linton
A sharklet 321ceo with 200 pax will fly seven hours thirty minutes block with two ACT according to my logbook. The Neo version will obviously be more economical
thanks.

Can you let us know, what was the route flown on this 7h30 block?
A380MSN0001 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2018, 04:16
  #8 (permalink)  
Cak
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: At home
Age: 42
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WOW air had a flight with 321neo this winter from Reykjavik to San Francisco, 2ACTs, flight time 8:40
Cak is offline  
Old 23rd May 2018, 07:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I understand you'll get 4000nm "commercial range" out of the 321LR with 240 pax. At 97T MTOW I think the issue will be luggage space rather than weight with the ACTs installed.

CP
CaptainProp is offline  
Old 23rd May 2018, 17:24
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Paris
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cak
WOW air had a flight with 321neo this winter from Reykjavik to San Francisco, 2ACTs, flight time 8:40
nice. Do we have an idea of the payload of that long flight?
A380MSN0001 is offline  
Old 24th May 2018, 12:03
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Wet Season
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tubby linton
A sharklet 321ceo with 200 pax will fly seven hours thirty minutes block with two ACT according to my logbook. The Neo version will obviously be more economical
I've done a 7h flight on a plain normal 321(2 ACT obviously) without too many problems. ALTN at around 30mins away
ni si ni no is offline  
Old 28th May 2018, 12:00
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The LR has 3 ACTs and MTOW of 97T.

CP
CaptainProp is offline  
Old 28th May 2018, 12:02
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just saw the notes at the bottom.

CP
CaptainProp is offline  
Old 28th May 2018, 13:29
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Equatorial
Age: 51
Posts: 1,068
Received 125 Likes on 62 Posts
Certainly interesting numbers.

The 737 Max is currently doing all the long range single isle flying in Asia. Silk Air doing flights around 7 hours. Obviously not with the 321 pax numbers.

So the A321NEO will be in a class of its own?
Global Aviator is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2018, 20:51
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus allegedly looking at an XLR version of the 321neo with even longer legs on than the LR. Not much info available yet though and nothing official from airbus.

CP
CaptainProp is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2018, 12:57
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Ireland
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well done to Airbus. They are squeezing every single drop out of the existing frame. I wonder if there will be another MTOM boost - to 100t or perhaps even more? Another question is the current wing. What kind of aerodynamic changes are they going to implement (if any)? Wing loading of the A321 is already pretty high.
Kakaru is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2018, 17:33
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought I read somewhere that it would be with an enhanced wing design but can’t find the article now.

CP
CaptainProp is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2018, 18:12
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: 60 north
Age: 59
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting stuff.
What kind of V1 Vr and V2 are we talking , and runway requirement ?
What are the Vref for max landing weight and runway requirement ?
BluSdUp is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2018, 03:34
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,556
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
Pardon my ignorance, what is an "ACT"?
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 22nd Jun 2018, 03:42
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,535
Received 49 Likes on 31 Posts
Additional Center Tank, normally one is fitted in the middle on the A320. Other models can have tanks forward and aft of this.
krismiler is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.