Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

"Radio Altimeter Alive" call

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

"Radio Altimeter Alive" call

Old 3rd May 2018, 07:32
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,548
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
A question for you.Can you explain the reason for one manufacturers call at DA "continue"? Why not " landing or land" What is the purpose of this call and when should it be used?.....
+1 to the two above replies..

The explanation we got when the company changed the call in our SOPs was that saying “land” was quite definitive and was perhaps subconsciously shifts the mental model/expectations of all involved in the wrong direction, whereas with “continue” you are reinforcing the fact you’ve still got options....
wiggy is online now  
Old 3rd May 2018, 09:25
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,289
Received 138 Likes on 62 Posts
My unadulterated FCOM states that it’s PF “checked” but if there’s no callout, it’s PM “RAdio altimeter alive”.
compressor stall is offline  
Old 4th May 2018, 09:56
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Dhaka
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vilas
The call "Landing" was changed by airbus to "continue" because it became like a commitment to land and the only decision you take at minima is go around flaps or continue. Even below minima GA possibility exists. This is subtle change some airlines still use landing.
Yeah Boeing FCTM also says 'continue' at DA/DH however below DA/DH, it says PF to call out 'Landing' if visual cues established. I find this interesting and puzzled a bit.

So are we going to call both Continue at DA and Landing below DA or is it just enough to call Continue at DA.

About the RA alive call, I dont see anywhere in boeing they recommend the call out checked or anything like that. But as many pointed out about good airmanship and using the call out.
carnival30 is offline  
Old 4th May 2018, 23:26
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Moonbase A
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No call at all on our 747
what we do say when cleared below Relevant MSA
is terrain. And PM goes or was already on terrain mode

Last edited by sjimmy; 5th May 2018 at 07:07.
sjimmy is offline  
Old 5th May 2018, 23:15
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sunnydale
Posts: 252
Received 76 Likes on 37 Posts
Originally Posted by Jwscud
Having had a GPWS failure in a 773 a few months back, I just asked my partner in crime to call “50” and flared based on the view out of the window. Result (in benign conditions) - my best landing of the year. The main thing I missed was not so much the call outs but the cadence of the call outs giving an extra cue to the rate of descent and progress of the flare.
id totally agree with the last points. I can land reasonably well without any callouts. In the flare I'm eyeballing it. But the cadence of the calls help me to fine tune it.

The relevance of the 2500 call is vital for SA. Why am I getting the 2500 call now when I'm still 20 miles out (I'm not saying it has happened to me.....yet). Having an awareness of when you should get the call will save someone's ass one day.
back to Boeing is online now  
Old 6th May 2018, 14:02
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N5109.2W10.5
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The relevance of the 2500 call is vital for SA. Why am I getting the 2500 call now when I'm still 20 miles out (I'm not saying it has happened to me.....yet).
what we do say when cleared below Relevant MSA is terrain. And PM goes or was already on terrain mode


Have a read of https://assets.publishing.service.go...975_G-AWNJ.pdf
This was before the days of "Terrain on ND" and even before GPWS was fitted.
Nairobi airfield is at an Altitude of 5,330 feet and the crew believed they were cleared to Altitude 5,000 ft. The crew acknowledged the radio Alt call of 2,500 feet (top of page 4) and during the approach they had full fly up on the ILS GP.
They must have been really fatigued!

Last edited by Goldenrivett; 6th May 2018 at 15:30. Reason: typo
Goldenrivett is offline  
Old 13th May 2018, 03:30
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: us
Age: 45
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up How is about auto callout "Minimum" not generated?

How is about "Minimum" not generated? I see this report in the techlog but when test will not listenable on ground, even programming with RA test-set. Anyone know this problem?
tks for discuss
airguy2012 is offline  
Old 13th May 2018, 09:07
  #48 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
On a certain popular type, for units equipped with AFS "QFE option" the auto call outs at minimum and 100 above do not sound on a LNAV-VNAV coupled approach (they do on ILS). A documented bug.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 13th May 2018, 16:47
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Goldenrivett
They must have been really fatigued!
They were very lucky. The crew of Flying Tiger Line 747 Freighter were not so lucky. On 19th Feb1989 when given clearance "Descent two four zero zero" descended below minimum height of NDB approach 2400ft and fatally crashed into hill side at 600ft. just before reaching NDB.
vilas is offline  
Old 13th May 2018, 18:30
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vilas
Goldenrivett
They were very lucky. The crew of Flying Tiger Line 747 Freighter were not so lucky. On 19th Feb1989 when given clearance "Descent two four zero zero" descended below minimum height of NDB approach 2400ft and fatally crashed into hill side at 600ft. just before reaching NDB.
video made about that flight:

really hard to watch
wiedehopf is offline  
Old 14th May 2018, 03:34
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pineteam
Talking for Airbus, I never noticed such a delay. In any case, the call out by the crew should be made when the reading is displayed.
in the other hand, I noticed sometimes the RA comes alive but no auto call out at 2500 AGL. Don’t know why.
Up for this question. Anyone knows the reason why? Again yesterday the RA became alive at 2500' AGL but no auto call out until 1000' AGL. A319, MSN 1758. Thanks.
pineteam is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.