Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

The Windward Turn Theory

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

The Windward Turn Theory

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Apr 2018, 09:48
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Manchester
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jet_Fan
Yeah, he thinks he’s found an all new force that everyone else has missed.
Nothing new here Its the same force that makes your groundspeed increase when you turn downwind and decrease when you turn upwind
Brercrow is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2018, 12:37
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its obviously Coriolis, So all you northerners please be careful when you do your downwind turns down under
autoflight is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2018, 06:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Brercrow
Nothing new here Its the same force that makes your groundspeed increase when you turn downwind and decrease when you turn upwind
No, no it isn't.....
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2018, 10:50
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London
Posts: 86
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Brercrow
Nothing new here Its the same force that makes your groundspeed increase when you turn downwind and decrease when you turn upwind
No, not at all where he is coming from. In his rather daft opinion, a headwind increases the speed of the relative wind (airspeed). This is a newbie/layman's mistake, I hear this spoken and see it written all the time, it's a pet hate of mine. He's taken the fact that a takeoff into wind is useful and turned it into a gain in lift whenever you point into wind in free flight. He's an idiot.

The CAA and FAA should do more to dispel this BS. Apparently this guy is/was an instructor with CAA certification. How many more jokers like him out there then?

Last edited by Jet_Fan; 10th Apr 2018 at 11:37.
Jet_Fan is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2018, 13:25
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Jet_Fan
How many more jokers like him out there then?
I was a keen Aerobatic plot back in the day. I had an "interesting" conversation with no less than the chief pilot of a major airline, also an Aerobat, who insisted you would get a longer vertical line if you pulled into it downwind, as you had more kinetic energy.

Attempts at explaining frames of reference went no where.

And before anyone pipes in, vertical lines were not supposed to be corrected for wind, the judges were supposed to allow for the fact that you would drift.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2018, 15:01
  #26 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London
Posts: 86
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Wizofoz
I was a keen Aerobatic plot back in the day. I had an "interesting" conversation with no less than the chief pilot of a major airline, also an Aerobat, who insisted you would get a longer vertical line if you pulled into it downwind, as you had more kinetic energy.

Attempts at explaining frames of reference went no where.

And before anyone pipes in, vertical lines were not supposed to be corrected for wind, the judges were supposed to allow for the fact that you would drift.
I'm not entirely surprised that it goes that far up having met so many with the same stupid gene. There should be no hiding place for such people, certainly isn't in the military, but the CAA and FAA aren't interested. I spoke to some retired CAA guy who claimed the whole debate was a 'matter of opinion'.
Jet_Fan is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2018, 18:59
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jet_Fan
The CAA and FAA should do more to dispel this BS.
That's gonna be tough. No dealings with the CAA but I would bet long odds that I could easily find FAA inspectors who believe in the downwind turn myth.
A Squared is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2018, 22:14
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just keeping it local, speeds approximate and in knots:
At the Equator: 970kn
Earth orbital speed around Sun: 58,000kn
Sun orbital speed around galaxy: 447,000kn (Really?)
Less local:
Galaxy through space: 1,166,310kn

So, when you make a 180 in your 50kn glider you change from going forwards at over a million knots to backwards at the same speed.
Better lock your hold on those flight controls!

p.s. Foregoing a bit of Shiraz induced reductio ad absurdum - did you notice?

Last edited by Basil; 11th Apr 2018 at 11:05.
Basil is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2018, 08:57
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by A Squared
That's gonna be tough. No dealings with the CAA but I would bet long odds that I could easily find FAA inspectors who believe in the downwind turn myth.
Richard Collins, editor of the US Flying magazine was a believer, writing articles about it.

Another of his mantras was that if a modification meant an engine delivered more power, it MUST increase fuel burn.

"Efficiency" was apparently a foreign concept to him.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2018, 16:12
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London
Posts: 86
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Wizofoz
Richard Collins, editor of the US Flying magazine was a believer, writing articles about it.

Another of his mantras was that if a modification meant an engine delivered more power, it MUST increase fuel burn.

"Efficiency" was apparently a foreign concept to him.
It's the equivalent of flat Earth and Apollo hoax.
Jet_Fan is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2018, 16:16
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wizofoz
I was a keen Aerobatic plot back in the day. I had an "interesting" conversation with no less than the chief pilot of a major airline, also an Aerobat, who insisted you would get a longer vertical line if you pulled into it downwind, as you had more kinetic energy.

Attempts at explaining frames of reference went no where.

And before anyone pipes in, vertical lines were not supposed to be corrected for wind, the judges were supposed to allow for the fact that you would drift.
If the vertical line was established by bouncing the airplane off a trampoline mounted to the ground at a 45 degree angle...
Vessbot is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2018, 18:14
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wizofoz
Richard Collins, editor of the US Flying magazine was a believer, writing articles about it.

Another of his mantras was that if a modification meant an engine delivered more power, it MUST increase fuel burn.

"Efficiency" was apparently a foreign concept to him.
Interesting, I did not know that about Collins.
A Squared is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2018, 23:06
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by A Squared
Interesting, I did not know that about Collins.
Actually, after a little googling, I think I defamed Collins- it was J McClellan, also a former Flying editor, who wrote an article full of all the non-science associated with the downwind turn myth.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 06:43
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,818
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by Wizofoz
Actually, after a little googling, I think I defamed Collins- it was J McClellan, also a former Flying editor, who wrote an article full of all the non-science associated with the downwind turn myth.
I know a good lawyer ...
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 07:14
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
I know a good lawyer ...
There are lots of good lawyers- but do you know a good one who is also alive?
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2018, 09:29
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the early days I was struggling with S&L in an out-of-trim Cherokee, and was discouraged from "playing" with the rudder trim on the basis that the tendency for it to keep flying one wing down was because of the crosswind...
16024 is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2018, 16:08
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 16024
In the early days I was struggling with S&L in an out-of-trim Cherokee, and was discouraged from "playing" with the rudder trim on the basis that the tendency for it to keep flying one wing down was because of the crosswind...
In recent days in an airliner, (which was a bit crooked) I was approaching to land with some aileron trim to the left, to hold a neutral force. The other pilot pointed out that we're expecting a right crosswind and I'm trimmed against the crosswind. I pointed out that it's trimmed neutral right now (and physically let go of the yoke to show him) and expected him to realize his brainfart. No, he persisted in trying to convince me that "I'm just making my job harder" being trimmed against the crosswind. I wish I was kidding.

Last edited by Vessbot; 13th Apr 2018 at 16:24.
Vessbot is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2018, 02:48
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ask him this:

Someone should ask him:

"Is there any conceivable air data instrument that you could stick onto an aircraft (or a bird) that would tell you what said aircraft or bird was doing relative to the ground?"

"Is there any conceivable air data instrument that you could stick onto an aircraft (or a bird) that would tell you what the wind was doing?"

It's astounding the difficulty people have with the concept of frames of reference.
Gauges and Dials is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2018, 02:52
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vessbot
In recent days in an airliner, (which was a bit crooked) I was approaching to land with some aileron trim to the left, to hold a neutral force. The other pilot pointed out that we're expecting a right crosswind and I'm trimmed against the crosswind. I pointed out that it's trimmed neutral right now (and physically let go of the yoke to show him) and expected him to realize his brainfart. No, he persisted in trying to convince me that "I'm just making my job harder" being trimmed against the crosswind. I wish I was kidding.
Take out a pencil and re-label the current position of the aileron trim indicator, "Neutral," wink at the other pilot, and say, "Thanks for catching that."
Gauges and Dials is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2018, 03:00
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Neither here nor there, but I love birds:

Aren't albatrosses effectively doing wave soaring: positioning themselves in the updraft part of the standing waves that are created when a constant wind blows over an irregular surface? With the irregular surface being the ocean? Constant speed wind striking the face of an ocean wave is very much like constant speed wind striking a mountain ridge: enormous updraft starting from the windward face and extending up and to leeward -- monster downsmashing rotor immediately to leeward of the wave crest / mountain peak. Albatross knows enough to stay in the updraft.
Gauges and Dials is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.