Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Why aircrafts are producing AC instead of DC ?

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Why aircrafts are producing AC instead of DC ?

Old 19th Jan 2018, 14:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: here
Age: 90
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We use to say :
AC is the muscle (high power needed, like pumps )
DC is the brain (like avionics- computers)
KAISERSOZE is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2018, 08:44
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dallas
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Basil
Not related to the OP but high voltage DC is now being used for long range power transmission. Mr Tesla would be disappointed
Can you provide an example?
ThreeThreeMike is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2018, 11:32
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-v...direct_current

whatever the reason google didn't work for you there.
wiedehopf is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2018, 14:44
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockport
Age: 84
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DC is used for long-distance (tens of miles or more) under(salt)water power links such as those between England and France. I have not investigated the rationale for choosing DC, but assume that an AC link would suffer significant losses because of the conductivity of the surrounding medium.
Dairyground is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2018, 16:54
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if the cable would have to care about the conductivity of saltwater then you would have a problem

as described in the link i posted above the capacitance of the under sea cable is the problem.

for over land it's only done for significantly longer distances.
wiedehopf is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2018, 18:05
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Down the Taxiway...
Age: 37
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For the same reason wy Cars shifted from DYNAMO's to Alternators,

Alternators are far more efficient than Dynamos.How ever it does depend upon the electrical design of the airplane.


For the B737 the engines drive Electrical AC Generators which in-tuurn power the electrical system and DC is generated via Rectifiers...

How ever on the ATR the Engines have DC generators which use the inverters to create AC (Constant frequency) and the Props drive Variable frequency AC alternators.

Also another reason for AC is Higher the frequency smaller is the design shape/size/weight of the electrical system/component.
bucks_raj is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2018, 18:31
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ThreeThreeMike
Can you provide an example?
The issue is that AT THE SAME VOLTAGE you get less losses from DC than AC and thus in principle it is better for long distance transmission.

However, transmission at Higher Voltage is very strongly beneficial.

As AC is way easier to step up and down (voltage) then AC wins for general power transmission. However for very long distances the balance shifts back to DC.
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2018, 18:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would be interested to know which large aircraft currently in service have DC generators?

Aircraft switched to AC in the 40/50s due to the higher power demands. Try finding a 75kw dc genny?
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2018, 19:13
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Boston
Age: 73
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if the cable would have to care about the conductivity of saltwater then you would have a problem
Actually not entirely true at least theoretically: surrounding wire carrying AC with a conductive medium will increase losses due to induced currents. On the other hand if the cable is balanced then the induced currents will mostly cancel.

Whether this is a real concern or not at the distances and frequencies in question I do not know.

Be careful of Google searches on this since you will find all sorts of (mis)information from the 'golden ears' audiophiles who can hear the difference in $500 vs $5000 speaker cables, although usually not in double blind tests.

One other advantage of long distance power transmission by DC is that it eliminates the need to keep the interconnected grids in phase.

As others have noted mechanically switching DC at much over 48 Volts is much more challenging due to the constant arc.
MurphyWasRight is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2018, 22:10
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While published by the FAA and focused more on GA aircraft, the following document (PDF) provides more than enough detail (100 pages) on aircraft electrical theory and use:

Chapter 9 - Aircraft Electrical System - PDF.

I provided my take over decade ago on the comparison, although I focused on actual voltages used and practical considerations rather than going into theoretical arguments of the use of DC vs AC:

AC vs DC Power
vapilot2004 is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2018, 08:09
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dallas
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Capt Pit Bull
The issue is that AT THE SAME VOLTAGE you get less losses from DC than AC and thus in principle it is better for long distance transmission.

However, transmission at Higher Voltage is very strongly beneficial.

As AC is way easier to step up and down (voltage) then AC wins for general power transmission. However for very long distances the balance shifts back to DC.
I didn't consider the absence of reactive power and skin effect in the DC scheme. It's obvious now that I think about it.

I found it interesting that a refitted DC transmission circuit can carry approximately 40% more voltage than the AC transmission circuit it replaces. Since DC is a constant voltage, assuming the current remains the same it can be transmitted at the former peak AC voltage rather than the RMS voltage capacity of the conductor while in AC service. That had not occurred to me.

I didn't think of checking Wikipedia when I asked my dumb question.

Last edited by ThreeThreeMike; 21st Jan 2018 at 10:41.
ThreeThreeMike is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2018, 08:58
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London
Age: 73
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The reason ac is used is that the power transmission is 3-phase. That means that , for a balanced system, i.e. each phase equally loaded, the current in the neutral wire is zero. so you have tree wires, each carrying one third of the power, and you don't need a return wire. DC systems carrying the same current would require six wires. Since weight equals cost on an aircraft, the choice is obvious.


However, dc has the advantage that multiple generators do not need to be synchronised in frequency and phase.
pachyderm is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2018, 11:28
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hate to disappoint you but there are 4 feeder cables coming out of my VFGs.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2018, 22:14
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: wales
Posts: 461
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Need to get up to date guys ! Go and look at the A380 system !
bvcu is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2018, 22:49
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,462
Received 135 Likes on 73 Posts
Or the 787.

Frequency wild 235v AC generation converted to square wave +/-270v DC, variable controlled 'frequency'.

Clever innit.
TURIN is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2018, 23:18
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TURIN
Or the 787.

Frequency wild 235v AC generation converted to square wave +/-270v DC, variable controlled 'frequency'.

Clever innit.
Would you mind explaining the square wave part?
is it DC or is it square wave?
wiedehopf is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2018, 23:19
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,058
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
I have to admit my last physics class was in the last millennium (and not even the last decade of that). But square wave DC sounds like an oxymoron.

I had a hard time finding detailed information on the 787 electrical system on Google. What I did find, though, seems to indicate that the +-270 V means that there are three conductors: one at ground potential, one at +270 V compared to that, and one at -270V. So, sort of like with the 120/240 VAC system common in the U.S., a specific piece of equipment can be connected to run at either 270 or 540 volts.
Chu Chu is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2018, 00:28
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Voltages supplied by the 787 electrical system are as follows:

28VDC - Traditional, through the batteries and TRUs, which are powered by the 235VAC system.

110VAC - Supplied through solid state PSUs, powered by the 235VAC system or ground power when connected. The 28VDC and 110V/400hz PSUs provide for the majority of electrical loads on the aircraft.

+/- 270VDC - Supplied through TRUs, 3 wire system as Chu Chu posts. Mainly supplies large electric motor loads such as hydraulic pumps, cabin air compressors, and center tank fuel pumps.

235VAC - Frequency wild as Turin states, 360-800hz, according to engine gearbox speed. Supplies starter/generators, wing anti-ice, flight control actuators, cabin air recirculating fans among others. These buses can also be supplied from the GPU 110VAC current through dedicated PSUs.

The flight control system electronics are powered by 3 independent, dedicated generators, two on the left engine, one on the right. As a backup, 28VDC from the TRUs or aircraft main batteries can also provide power, as can, temporarily, dedicated batteries.
vapilot2004 is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2018, 00:47
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,407
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
vapilot,

How do you like it? Why did they use DC to drive pumps and the compressors? It would seem that AC would be better.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2018, 02:35
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am with you, GF, it does seem odd. Not typed in nor have I flown in one (although our group was afforded a tour early on) but two of our mechs are fully fluent across Boeing's fleet.

My guess would be the frequency wild 235V main AC bus power would not be appropriate for motor operation and high power electronic devices work most efficiently with DC currents. In addition, most of the high power 270VDC loads are variable speed motors and the use of high voltage reduces the conductor size requirements, saving weight.
vapilot2004 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.