Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B737 Engine Surge followed by Overheat

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B737 Engine Surge followed by Overheat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Dec 2017, 12:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: In Space
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B737 Engine Surge followed by Overheat

Hello guys,

I got a question regarding a situation that I believe the BA B744 recently had out of Phoenix. But I would like to apply it to the B738.

If on take off you get engine surge/stall indications but also an overheat which memory item(s) would you suggest initiating?

My answer would be the Engine Overheat memory items.

Seeing as there are memory items for both the Engine surge/stall and also and overheat plus the engine fire, severe damage, separation. I would like to know your thoughts.
B737900er is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2017, 12:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The times we’ve practiced engine surge during take off in the sim the pulsating yawing from the surges has made the aircraft a handful to control. So, retarding the thrust to get rid of that has been the first thing to do (even with the help of my colleague).

/With the usual caveat that the simulator may not behave as a real world event
172_driver is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2017, 15:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd go with the following thinking, as it's on take off and I therefore assume you are climbing away not yet clean; i.e. close to the ground, perhaps.

The initial actions are the same, with the proviso that an OVERHEAT says close TL, whereas SURGE is reduce as necessary until closed.
Surge, if allowed to continue can lead to other damage. Overheat, if allowed to continue can spoil your day more. Surge is obvious, Overheat could be sensor, but it's not wise to consider that risk in such a position. There is no time to trouble-shoot.
For me I'd rather have the a/c under control in a constant thrust status, therefore close the TL. That allows me to control & trim the a/c for a constant thrust climb out. It is also less distracting for PM.
This leads me to opt for the OVERHEAT memory items. It solves both problems with prioritising the worse, reduce work load and make control simpler.
This supposes you're not going any where anyway.

Last edited by RAT 5; 31st Jan 2018 at 18:39.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2017, 18:31
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,206
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Fly the airplane to a workable altitude then FIRE memory items and shutdown checklist.
B2N2 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2017, 08:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Nearer home than before!
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm with RAT5 all the way. Disconnect A/T, smoothly retard TL to idle and then just concentrate on flying the aircraft, you'll either remove the surge, remove the Overheat warning or you won't. If you do, job's a good'un, if you don't it make PM's job easier. But first and foremost, get the thrust predictable, and the aircraft up and away safely.
RVF750 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2017, 13:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm with RAT5 too
sonicbum is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2017, 13:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,553
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by 172_driver
The times we’ve practiced engine surge during take off in the sim the pulsating yawing from the surges has made the aircraft a handful to control. So, retarding the thrust to get rid of that has been the first thing to do (even with the help of my colleague).

/With the usual caveat that the simulator may not behave as a real world event
Well on that aspect of this it might be worth bearing in mind not all surges are the same and the sims seem to do seem to replicate “worse case”...

I don’t know if the PHX crew reported any handling issues but FWIW I’ve had a brief series of pop surge(s) on takeoff on a 744 .... hot, high and heavy.....and no, not the one referred to by the OP...

It was certainly noisy, and being at night visually impressive to all and sundry both inside and outside the aircraft and fore and aft of the wing, so just like the video, but our event probably lasted under five seconds. Symptoms on the flight deck: a few very, very, and only just perceptible tiny flickers to one of the EGTs, which even so always remained within limits, some minor jolts but little in the way of yaw or other control issues...

Given it was unclear to anybody on the flight deck ( we had a heavy) as to which engine was definitely involved and given whichever one had been surging auto recovered very quickly a team decision was made to leave them all running at takeoff thrust. I wouldn’t argue with any of the previous advice about checklist actioning, just caution any assumption that diagnosing the exact source of even a noisy surge will be easy, or caution any assumption that you will get the sometimes violent jolting and yaw effects that are modelled in the sims...

FWIW in our case the engine involved did go pop properly and in a terminal manner a few days later........

Last edited by wiggy; 21st Dec 2017 at 19:06.
wiggy is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2017, 18:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,408
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
As wiggy notes, if an engine surges but quickly recovers and doesn't continue to surge, no immediate action is required (especially since, as wiggy also notes, it's often not obvious which engine it was). If it keeps surging then a controlled throttle retard is warranted when work load permits. But keep your wits about you and communicate with the PM to make sure you're addressing the correct engine (again, it's not always obvious).
There was a rather infamous incident at Boeing during the PW4000 development in the 1980s (I had several friends on the event flight). They were flying a prototype PW4000 engine on the Line No. 1 767 (VA001) - with a JT9D on the other wing. During takeoff from Boeing Field, the PW4000 started surging at about 50 ft. - un-recoverable surge. The pilot flying didn't say a word, but calmly reached over and retarded both throttles to idle . As the aircraft started settling towards the Georgetown neighborhood, the PM took control and slammed both throttles to the firewall - the PW4000 furiously barking the whole way before it was shutdown and they circled back around and landed.
That particular Boeing flight test pilot was demoted...
tdracer is online now  
Old 22nd Dec 2017, 08:59
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: In Space
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the input guys, I guess my initial thinking was correct. In the sim when we practice our OEI manoeuvres, the problem is usually just one thing (overheat, fire, seizure) but reality is that there may be more than one diagnosis.
B737900er is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2017, 14:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the sim when we practice our OEI manoeuvres, the problem is usually just one thing (overheat, fire, seizure) but reality is that there may be more than one diagnosis.

Indeed. I wonder if airlines could be more imaginative in their recurrence programs. I used to find them distinctly lacking. Thankfully I've no direct experience of in-flight engine failures, but I suspect engine failures are often associated with more complicated reasons than a simple wind down. The sim exercises tend to be a simple distinction between failure & damage followed by SE handling & QRH action. Job done. I think the Qantas A380 engine malfunction & the BA loss of total thrust in volcano ash showed that the real world has never heard of a simulator and has a wicked imagination.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2017, 21:50
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Reducing the throttle should correct, either or both the surge and the overheat. if it doesn't correct the overheat, expect the engine is lost completely until shutdown.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2018, 11:34
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,

There was a rather infamous incident at Boeing during the PW4000 development in the 1980s (I had several friends on the event flight). They were flying a prototype PW4000 engine on the Line No. 1 767 (VA001) - with a JT9D on the other wing. During takeoff from Boeing Field, the PW4000 started surging at about 50 ft. - un-recoverable surge. The pilot flying didn't say a word, but calmly reached over and retarded both throttles to idle . As the aircraft started settling towards the Georgetown neighborhood, the PM took control and slammed both throttles to the firewall - the PW4000 furiously barking the whole way before it was shutdown and they circled back around and landed.
That particular Boeing flight test pilot was demoted...
It was a flight test, so I assume ballast tanks (filled with water) were installed to simulate passengers weight and cargo load. I don't know about the fuel weight. With that being said and I stand to be corrected:
a) Can this plane still climb with both throttles in idle?

b) I am wondering if flight test pilots have to follow the same procedures (I mean abnormal procedures from QRH after problems or emergency conditions such stall, engine fire...etc) as other regular pilots OR flight test pilots have different abnormal procedures than the QRH?

Feedback appreciated.
AeroTech is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2018, 13:12
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 803
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AeroTech
Hi,

It was a flight test, so I assume ballast tanks (filled with water) were installed to simulate passengers weight and cargo load.
Only if they were testing it for that weight on that particular flight, and nothing in the quote indicates that. Also, since they were testing an engine and not the airplane, I don't see a reason to be flying at a high weight.

a) Can this plane still climb with both throttles in idle?
No.
Vessbot is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2018, 17:11
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fly the aircraft to a safe altitude then reduce thrust as normal. Take a breath and see whats happening.
Had an RB211 cough it's guts out during base training. It's more startling than catastrophic. Especially if the flames are shooting forward of the nose. But a surge is due to bad airflow and a change in thrust or airspeed could fix it.

So use it while you can and make it safe when you don't need it anymore.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2018, 17:35
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Nirvana..HAHA..just kidding but,if you can tell me where it is!
Posts: 350
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAT 5,
Small point here,but both checklists say to reduce thrust until either surge cured or overheat meassage goes away..then run at reduced thrust,..(or,as you see fit)
Apologies,Rat..I'm reading for 777..
Yaw String is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2018, 01:33
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: America
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FE Hoppy
Take a breath and see whats happening.
. Fly the airplane and then as FE Hoppy's quote.
Don Gato is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2018, 12:22
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Yaw String
RAT 5,
Small point here,but both checklists say to reduce thrust until either surge cured or overheat meassage goes away..then run at reduced thrust,..(or,as you see fit)
Apologies,Rat..I'm reading for 777..
RAT 5 is right: close for overheat, retard (until...) for limit/surge/stall. This is for 737-700/800/900.
xetroV is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2018, 19:14
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: 60 north
Age: 59
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aero Teck

I think tdracer are talking about an 767 and AirCanada did some testing with regards to this from FL410. They did a good 100 plus Nm glide and made Gimli airport famous. No climb. Some sideslip on final as they were high tough.

With regards to test pilots and what they do and dont , with critical testing , extra sensors and engineers involved they do a lot we would never consider.
Super planed.

I have seen some interesting non-standard stuff being pulled off by testpilots.
Checklist , CRM and SOP not a strong side . Great gang , but old boring standard stuff , Naahh.
Murphy has his ways!
But going from testpilot for Boeing to glider pilot in one day ,
As one testpilot once told me with a blush; We testpilots make mistakes too!
( Turned out the engine started much better with the firebutton in again, as we had just concluded it worked as intended when pushed and released!)
BluSdUp is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.