Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Fuel Savings

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Fuel Savings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Nov 2017, 11:38
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Queensland
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mh152, I am happy that you and a couple of others see the fixation on reduced fuel burn as but a small part of the actual complex cost of operations.
autoflight is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2017, 12:34
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Fiji
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and then there are pilots getting paid by actual block time and pilots getting paid by calculated block time.

some of these colleagues taxi with 10 knots on runway parallel taxiways at the end of the day to produce lates and thus more money and days off.

factored block times and paid calculated factored block times will achieve a pilot trying to work less for same money. higher fuel cost, but lower maintenance etc costs.

I (FO 320 allowed to taxi and park the Bus) hate taxi behind Lufthansa group, Turkish and Austrian. We always sniff in their ass on the taxiway and they block others.
gnarlberg is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2017, 12:48
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,553
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by autoflight
mh152, I am happy that you and a couple of others see the fixation on reduced fuel burn as but a small part of the actual complex cost of operations.
I don't think anyone is down playing the importance of trying for a reduction in fuel burn, yes ops costs are important, but when at the moment the cost of overnight HOTAC etc in the vicinity of a major airport could quickly add up to the same as a tonne of avtur there is perhaps the argument that it perhaps fuel burn isn't the only thing that needs to be considered if you are really interested in the bottom line.
wiggy is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2017, 21:52
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Sunnydale
Posts: 252
Received 102 Likes on 48 Posts
Whilst I agree with a lot of the above, we as flight crew are not aware of the whole story. We don't know what a hotel room around the airport will cost. We don't know what it will cost to throw one of our punters on a different airline's aircraft, we don't know what percentage of our punters will claim eu261 compensation.

We like to think we know better than others but in reality we don't. We do not know how much it will cost to get joe bloggs from Paris to Heathrow to Kennedy. I have regularly been given high speed flight plans and I have been asked to slow down. I am absolutely happy to do everything to the best of my ability to reduce costs. But I will also fly the plan. At worst if I don't I'll lose a third pilot or an extra day off or..........
back to Boeing is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2017, 14:33
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,553
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I have regularly been given high speed flight plans and I have been asked to slow down
Likewise...so maybe just saving fuel isn't the company's goal 100% of the time..


We don't know what a hotel room around the airport will cost.
But I know a man who does ....certainly around one of the London airports even at a "bulk" rate it soon adds and if you are dealing with a group missing a conection it pretty quickly wipes out that 300 kg of fuel you saved over 10 or more hours..

I wouldn't advocate running around with the leading edges glowing, and a combination of flying the plan whilst also trying to fit in with whatever arrival pucntuality SOP your company has seems fair..
wiggy is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2017, 18:50
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: U.S.A
Age: 56
Posts: 497
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I have a giggle at how dumb we are every time we single engine taxi out to save 50 lbs of gas and then rush the checklist and engine warm up as a result followed by 0.8 all the way home transcon over burning 500-800 lbs of gas to catch a commute flight!!!!
oicur12.again is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2017, 22:16
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: At home
Age: 64
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We are pilots, who approach the OP question with technical answers. The real answer is that airlines don't actually worry about saving fuel. They want to save money!. Fuel and money may not be the same thing;sometimes. At my company, right now, they are attempting to save money.

We fly the flight plan with single engine taxi when we can. I get ACARS messages sometimes asking me to slow down, on a transcon, to allow better flow at the Hub for a Hub bank. We fly high speed sometimes because they want the airplane somewhere so another crew can get another hour of utilization that day.

There is a giant computer system in Dallas that makes these decisions along with folks in the System Control Center. I just fly the airplane they way they tell me, mostly, and let them worry about the big picture of the airline. There are almost a thousand airplanes and an average of nearly 6,700 flights per day to nearly 350 destinations in more than 50 countries.

It's sort of like the Army...Shut up and do like you are told. The only difference is it pays better and I don't have to salute anyone and we don't have bombs or heavy artillery.
Zaphod Beblebrox is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2017, 06:21
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Zaphod
Very professional airline. I think that's the way to go. The whole picture! rather than everyone trying to fiddle with the CI, without knowing what lies ahead.

Last edited by vilas; 9th Nov 2017 at 16:34.
vilas is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.