Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Reverse during taxi

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Reverse during taxi

Old 17th May 2017, 13:17
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finland
Age: 77
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aside from landing, I have, on the A319/320, used only idle reverse during only taxi out at only one airfield, Stuttgart.

It is somewhat downhill to the threshold of 25 and idle reverse helped the brake temperatures to remain below the max brake temperature for take off.

The ops. manual, it has been many years since I retired, at that time, and may still, allowed idle reverse while taxying.
finncapt is offline  
Old 17th May 2017, 13:18
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skipping Classes
There's a requirement by law for the reversers to be visually checked stowed before the take-off.

Can you give a reference? This is the first I hear of such a "law".
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Old 17th May 2017, 13:26
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The 737 Classic FCTM discusses use of reverse after landing.


Quote: The thrust levers should be positioned to reverse idle by taxi speed then to full down after the engines have decelerated to idle. Unquote.
This suggests that ingestion is not a problem at reverse idle.
Depending on your point of view, it could be argued that providing you don't go above reverse idle (approx. 22% N1) you could slip into reverse idle without harming the engines in order to keep taxi speeds from building up in a long taxi and thus minimising brake heat increase.
Judd is offline  
Old 17th May 2017, 17:16
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I only ever used reverse (idle) on taxi out on the B737-200 with the clamshell reversers (best reversers I have ever used!), usually only ever in the summer on hot days. As an aside, the 737-family was also the only aircraft type with no brake temp display that I have flown.

At one point on the B737-200 the manuals did permit reversing back from stand, and it was practised in the sim, although never used in reality at BA.

As Finncapt says, taxying out at Stuttgart for Runway 25 was a challenge in summer in the early A320's at BA without the brake fans, although I never had to resort to using reverse, as far as I can recall.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 17th May 2017, 17:50
  #25 (permalink)  
Longtimelurker
 
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: killington Vt
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Backing off gate using reverse thrust was the normal operation on B727 DC9 MD80 at my US airline in the 80's/ 90's supposedly to save money. They changed back to push back crew with tug in late 90's again to save money .
filejw is offline  
Old 17th May 2017, 18:06
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reversing from gate (powerback) is a bit different, because these days there are noise & safety regulations which may limit or prohibit such practice.

Typically at most major airports powerbacks (if allowed) may only be conducted from specific gates during specific times, with prior approval from the airport authority. The airline/operator must also have an approved OpSpec and associated procedures to conduct powerbacks.
peekay4 is offline  
Old 18th May 2017, 08:22
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Nearer home than before!
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, time to inject a bit of logic to this. The aircraft mentioned above that have used reverse in taxi tend to have clamshell reversers and all of the flow is directed by them.

However, aircraft with high bypass engines and sleeved reversers only use the fan air to create a wall of air that causes the drag to slow you. It's less the forward momentum of the air than the large area of disturbed air that acts like a parachute effect.

At idle, the majority of thrust you are getting out the back is the core. SO reverse idle is providing f**t in a spacesuit type usefulness in this case. If you need reverse you need to give it a HANDFUL to do much.

Better to brake to a near standstill and taxi slowly. The friction of braking or riding the brakes is far greater at higher speeds, so controlling the aircraft down a slope is going to generate a lot less heat at walking pace than 25kts.

Also this gives you more time to get to the single engine taxi point and makes for a smoother and quieter taxi in. Just my 20c worth...
RVF750 is offline  
Old 18th May 2017, 21:08
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many jets with high bypass engines can powerback, perhaps most notably the 757.

However, most new jets today are not approved for powerbacks -- even if they are physically capable to do so. And as already mentioned, most airports have restrictions against powerbacks.
peekay4 is offline  
Old 21st May 2017, 22:47
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Islas Baleares
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wiggy
In the context of taxiing to the runway for take off FWIW on some types (certainly at least one heavy I know of) there is a limitation that you can't single engine taxi if you are above Maximum Landing weight
What's the reason for that?
BewareOfTheSharklets is offline  
Old 24th May 2017, 07:59
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dark Side of The Moon
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@Amadis of Gaul: checking correct reversers stowage during the exterior pre-flight inspection is a required check for almost any modern jet. You should be able to find it in your FCOM/FCTM.
Skipping Classes is offline  
Old 24th May 2017, 08:08
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skipping Classes
There's a requirement by law for the reversers to be visually checked stowed before the take-off. This is usually done during the pre-flight walk-around inspection. Once you used your reversers you must check them visually again, if you are unable to do it from the cockpit/cabin (as the case be with many airliners) you need to stop, shutdown, get out, do a walk around and then continue. Not very practical.
Probably just your company procedures? I know of no such law.
It would be very unpractical as well, any (low speed) RTO would lead to a taxi back to gate for an inspection.

It is irrelevant that we check reversers stowed during the walkaround. IThat still does not make it 'law' to visually inspect reversers after you used them during taxi.
PENKO is offline  
Old 24th May 2017, 10:46
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skipping Classes
@Amadis of Gaul: checking correct reversers stowage during the exterior pre-flight inspection is a required check for almost any modern jet. You should be able to find it in your FCOM/FCTM.
That's not what I asked. I was inquiring about the "law" that requires shutting down, getting out and checking them again after using them during taxi.
Amadis of Gaul is offline  
Old 25th May 2017, 14:54
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dark Side of The Moon
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh all-right, no, that's an extrapolation. How else can you *visually* ensure the reversers are properly stowed before take-off?
Skipping Classes is offline  
Old 25th May 2017, 14:59
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You don't. It is not required to visually ensure anything. Do you visually ensure your flaps are out on every takeoff? No.

Yes you check the reversers during your walk around. But a walk around is classified as pre-flight. It has nothing to do with the actual operation of the aircraft once moving under power. So no, unless you can quote the article, I'd say there is no general rule or law prohibiting the use of reversers during taxi other than the usual type-dependent operational guidelines which may or may not prohibit their use.
PENKO is offline  
Old 25th May 2017, 15:02
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Village of Santo Poco
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PENKO
You don't. It is not required to visually ensure anything. Do you visually ensure your flaps are out on every takeoff?
It's OK, Penko, he was just extrapolating.
Amadis of Gaul is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.