Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

RVR Requirements for Low Visibility Approaches in the US (Foreign Carriers

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

RVR Requirements for Low Visibility Approaches in the US (Foreign Carriers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Dec 2016, 11:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Europe
Age: 60
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RVR Requirements for Low Visibility Approaches in the US (Foreign Carriers

Hey folks,

is anyone of you familiar with the FAA requirements on CAT II/III for foreign carriers in the US?

Is is really true, that TWO RVR values are required AND controlling when conducting low vis approaches?

Could someone please state a source of reliable information (FAA docs or so..)?

Thank you so much!!
knarfo is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2016, 07:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The answer to your question is likely to be company dependent. Over here, different companies have different requirements. It may also vary by aircraft type. We need at least 2 RVR readings for a Fail Operative CAT3, and if the 3rd is operating, it must be taken into account.
Check Airman is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2016, 09:18
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Europe
Age: 60
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Check Airman,

I am not talking about company policy but legal requirements. In europe, ATC may report only one RVR on a CAT III, which is totally legal. If more RVRs are reported (which is likely) we have our specific company regulations. But generally, only ONE RVR reported by ATC t is sufficient in Europe. Do you have a data source, where I can find the requirement of having a minimum of two RVRs in the US? Thereis/was one, but I can't find the reference.

Thanks!!
knarfo is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2016, 10:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the FAA Ops Specs. Hopefully your company provides this info to you. For us, for CAT III fail-operational, 3 RVR required and controlling but if one is temporarily inoperative, then two are required and controlling.

That way, we don't have to divert if one RVR is U/S.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2016, 10:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The FAA will issue a foreign air carrier Ops Specs under FAR 129.

"CAT II/III Approach and Landing Minimums (Foreign Air Carrier). AC 120-29 (CAT II), AC 120-28, and this order establish the lowest approach and landing minimums that can be authorized, under any circumstances, for foreign air carrier CAT II/III operations in the United States. These minimums are equivalent to the minimums authorized for a comparably equipped U.S. operator. The CAT II operating minimums are specified in OpSpec C059 (H108 for rotorcraft), and CAT III operating minimums are specified in OpSpec C060 (H109 for rotorcraft), and in a manner similar to minimums specified for U.S. operators. The airborne equipment required for CAT II/III operations must also be specified in the appropriate OpSpec."

Then you have to dig through AC 120-28 and 120-29. The way I remember it (for my airline) is I need one RVR report (at touchdown) for a CAT I, two reports (touchdown and rollout) for a CAT II and three reports (touchdown, midfield and rollout) for a CAT III. With the note as Jammed Stab said that if the rollout is inop for a CAT II we can use the midfield and either the midfield or rollout can be temporary inop for a CAT III. Like a lot of stuff in US airline ops, it's whatever your FAA office approved. For foreign air carriers that's usually the JFK International Office.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2016, 14:28
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Europe
Age: 60
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you folks,
checked the docs you mentioned. That explains a lot!
knarfo is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2016, 19:27
  #7 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,319
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
knarfo, the EU explanation you've given above does not read right to. Off the thread, I know, just a remark. Thanks for sharing such an interesting topic!
FlightDetent is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.