Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

why no GPWS ECAM alert on A320

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

why no GPWS ECAM alert on A320

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Aug 2016, 00:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Beau_Peep
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: India
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why no GPWS ECAM alert on A320

GPWS warnings are fixed and so the actions!

I wonder why airbus doesn't have any GPWS ECAM alert with actions mentioned? is it because there is no time to read and do? Actions are expected to be from memory instantly?

similarly with TCAS and WINDSHEAR. Detection mechanism is there along with aural alert, but no ECAM alert again.

Out of the other memory items, EMER DESCENT procedure is the only one that triggers ECAM alert CAB PR EXCESS CAB ALT and displays the actions too.

any thought?
IFLY_INDIGO is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2016, 07:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: 500 miles from Chaikhosi, Yogistan
Posts: 4,295
Received 139 Likes on 63 Posts
You're heading towards a mountain / another aircraft. The relevant warning goes off.

Do you have time to register, look read, digest then action? In that time you will the subject a CFIT thread in R&N.

Would have thought it pretty obvious, but I find my self out of touch with the way some younger people think these days.
compressor stall is online now  
Old 7th Aug 2016, 08:15
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Mordor
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I even wonder why Airbus considers EGPWS as a "memory action", when it is a maneuver...
Sidestick_n_Rudder is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2016, 08:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Soon to be out of the EU.
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying toward a hill, the last thing you want to be doing is an ECAM drill with both pilots potentially looking in and down, you want to be looking UP and flying in that direction too hopefully.

I can just see it now:

NAV GPWS TERR AHEAD

PM - "NAV, GPWS TERR AHEAD"
PF - "NAV, GPWS TERR AHEAD"
PF - "My radios, ECAM action"
PM "NAV, GPWS TERR AHEAD, PULL UP"
------***HITS MOUNTAIN***

Getting out of there is the priority. A lot of issues have memory items and initial actions which must be recalled.

Fly and navigate are the priority. Everything else falls into the "stuff" category. It's all just niff naff and trivia compared to fly and navigate.
HeartyMeatballs is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2016, 10:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,556
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
I even wonder why Airbus considers EGPWS as a "memory action", when it is a maneuver...
The action is to conduct the manoeuvre.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2016, 11:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whether ECAM or Non normal C/L in Boeing is the same as read and do. These procedures have sever time constraints and they simply do not have the time to read and do. Even EMER DES initial actions are not read and do. Out of these TCAS and EMER DES are manoeuvres that are not required to be executed with high G and they are available on autopilot in some models of airbus FBW.
vilas is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2016, 14:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
any thought?
Yes. My thought is there's no use going to the pearly gates saying "oh but I was addressing my ECAM". Really!?
PPRuNeUser0182 is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2016, 14:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
I would have thought the answer to this question obvious. But I hadn't taken into account the modern philosophy that "if it's not on the ECAM/EICAS, it's not happening".

Whatever happened to common sense and airmanship?
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2016, 14:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
They were taken out of the ATPL syllabus in 2003.

NAV GPWS PULL UP

WHICH BIT OF "PULL UP" DIDNT YOU UNDERSTAND?
lurkio is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2016, 02:07
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: 5° above the Equator, 75° left of Greenwich
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would you need the ECAM to tell you to pull up for your life? There can't be an ECAM for everything, especially something as time critical as a GPWS warning, a TCAS, a windshear. Seriously: pull up, climb, descend. I don't think you need more instructions than those.

In the emergency descent, the ECAM actions are regarding the procedure to counteract the excessive cab press, no comment is given on the emergency descent procedure other than "initiate".

There's no ECAM for an overweight landing too and that's a much less critical scenario.

As adfus said, Airbus has done great things to get us all rid of memory procedures, but this is still a flying machine traveling at great speeds. You could eventually need to do something right now.

*master warning*
- master warning reset. "I have control and communications"
- "you have control and communications"
- "ecam actions"
- "ecam actions, nav gpws terrain, pull up"

Quite a waste of time for a metallic flying thing heading towards a mountain/other flying thing. Don't you think?
Escape Path is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.