Precise calculation for VDP in nautical miles.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Precise calculation for VDP in nautical miles.
This is how I calculate VDP in nm.
VDP in nm = (MDH-TCH) / (106.13 x des. angle)
MDH = Minimum Descent Height
TCH = Threshold Crossing Height
From the diagram below. If using a calculator:
980➖293➖55➗106.13➗3.5
[IMG]
[/IMG]
VDP in nm = (MDH-TCH) / (106.13 x des. angle)
MDH = Minimum Descent Height
TCH = Threshold Crossing Height
From the diagram below. If using a calculator:
980➖293➖55➗106.13➗3.5
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Last edited by Dadanawa; 3rd Sep 2016 at 22:19.
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dadanawa,
Two decimal points! I am impressed.
However, how do you monitor progress after you commence descent? Do the mental gymnastics need to be repeated?
I do not know what aeroplane/FMS you are referring to but those aeroplanes fitted with a ND and a 'end of descent' indication of some sort do tend to make a lot of this work academic I would have thought?
Two decimal points! I am impressed.
However, how do you monitor progress after you commence descent? Do the mental gymnastics need to be repeated?
I do not know what aeroplane/FMS you are referring to but those aeroplanes fitted with a ND and a 'end of descent' indication of some sort do tend to make a lot of this work academic I would have thought?
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I used to do stuff like that when i was young and enthusiastic. It faded very fast and since then i just do what the manual says: Fly the CDFA profile to DA, if i see something i continue, if not i go around. And yes, even on non precision approaches it is a DA nowadays, we dont use MDAs anymore.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Actus,
I guess it becomes important when the VDP is before the missed approach point. Also some countries do not have the height/distance table. For that, I use a spreadsheet program.
I guess it becomes important when the VDP is before the missed approach point. Also some countries do not have the height/distance table. For that, I use a spreadsheet program.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It becomes becomes important if you have to calculate your own CDFA descent path or use dive and drive. For aircraft with fairly modern (30 years or so) systems that is mainly a thing of the past.
I have to say i'm intrigued about the missing distance/altitude table, could you give an example of an international airport? Others might not be in my database.
I have to say i'm intrigued about the missing distance/altitude table, could you give an example of an international airport? Others might not be in my database.
de facto, oh we fly a CDFA, it's just that with a VS mode that can't be adjusted without using "SYNC" it is often easier to just hand fly it and follow the profile with good support from the PNF.
Also some countries do not have the height/distance table.
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: australia
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dadanawa,
A spreadsheet??
I do not know what job you have now but you should consider being an approach designer or a nav data base coder.
From a 'planning' point of view, i.e. on the ground before flight, I am with you 100% but when it comes to 'flying' this stuff, I tend to take the uneducated 'nike' approach and 'just do it'.
A bit too flippant I will admit but I think you get my drift.
A spreadsheet??
I do not know what job you have now but you should consider being an approach designer or a nav data base coder.
From a 'planning' point of view, i.e. on the ground before flight, I am with you 100% but when it comes to 'flying' this stuff, I tend to take the uneducated 'nike' approach and 'just do it'.
A bit too flippant I will admit but I think you get my drift.
Indeed Bloggs, I was interpreting the VDP as being the whole descent not just the visual bit below DA/MDA. It is all a bit academic if you're just working out a descent point to take you from 500ish feet to the TDZ!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmm, right, below MDA we have to fly visually anyway, in our company we have to switch off the FDs to enforce that as well.
I would go with actus reus' approach there. Just do it and fly the damn airplane, its not rocket science.
I would go with actus reus' approach there. Just do it and fly the damn airplane, its not rocket science.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, i only have LIDO charts available that do have a distance/altitude table for that approach. I guess it is just a service LIDO provides then vs Jeppesen just taking the AIP information without adding anything.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Home
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with all. Below MDH, of course PAPIs, VASIS, visual, etc.
Just for parts of the world that do not have the height/distance table, or on the abscence of VNAV, you need to have this information to work with for CDFA.
Just for parts of the world that do not have the height/distance table, or on the abscence of VNAV, you need to have this information to work with for CDFA.
