B727-200 Autopilot
Find that rather hard to believe, can anyone support that ?
I've got an Eastern Airlines Flight Manual that lists the requires for CAT IIIa approaches. The first hint is having "A" "B" or "AB" options on the autopilot pitch channel selector.
-19(?) engines. Rocket ship. Huge improvement over the -15's(?).
Then there are the Valsan conversions with -217 or -219 engines. The -219s are running 21,700 pounds of thrust down the runway. Ridden in one of those a couple times, true rocket ship performance.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Used to fly a converted -231 into a freighter. Had -219s on the sides and a -17 in the center. Ferrying with 2,000lbs ballast for CG purposes with 20,000lbs of gas the only direction on is going is skyward with IVSI pegged. Controllers used to ask "You guys really a 727?"
Now for the old autopilot with dual channel. I used to engage the aileron portion and hand fly the pitch rather than using the speed/Mach mode on the pitch as too much porpoising resulted. Probably because of CG shifts do to Pax and galley cart movements. On the old -7 powered lead sleds at heavier weights and warm OATs, one may have to descend to regain climb speed.
Now for the old autopilot with dual channel. I used to engage the aileron portion and hand fly the pitch rather than using the speed/Mach mode on the pitch as too much porpoising resulted. Probably because of CG shifts do to Pax and galley cart movements. On the old -7 powered lead sleds at heavier weights and warm OATs, one may have to descend to regain climb speed.
Last edited by captjns; 3rd Jan 2016 at 18:20.
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Autoland on a 727 ?
Find that rather hard to believe, can anyone support that ?
Find that rather hard to believe, can anyone support that ?
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suspect that the Alaska 727-200ADV were part of the group of airplanes that Alaska got from Singapore 727-212ADV with the -17 engines. They were exceptionally well equipped with AT, ABS and believe auto speed brakes as well. High gross weight somewhere around 198K. Do not recall ever seeing an auto land option in the 727 but it might have been an option. Looking at My Boeing Fleet and it does not show up when doing a word search
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: JAAland
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Courtesy of smartcockpit.com, B727 Automatic Flight .
Looks like the 727 was capable with block V equipment.
Looks like the 727 was capable with block V equipment.
Aviator Extraordinaire
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK456
Now that I think back, I seem to remember that on N2777 (or N27 ?), the -100 we got from the FAA, had an auto-land system installed for testing purposes. It was removed before we got the aircraft.
At least that was what we were told by someone from the FAA after we got the 727. Any truth to that rumor that you are aware of?
Now that I think back, I seem to remember that on N2777 (or N27 ?), the -100 we got from the FAA, had an auto-land system installed for testing purposes. It was removed before we got the aircraft.
At least that was what we were told by someone from the FAA after we got the 727. Any truth to that rumor that you are aware of?
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spooky - I think our -200's w/-15 engines grossed out at around 196,000(??). I thought the AK's were much higher, like 208,000??
Research shows some topped out at 209,500. So 208,000 might have been close.
We didn't fly them anywhere near that weight, just DFW-SEA, so it was a reasonable weight and the improved performance of the -17's was noticeable.
Research shows some topped out at 209,500. So 208,000 might have been close.
We didn't fly them anywhere near that weight, just DFW-SEA, so it was a reasonable weight and the improved performance of the -17's was noticeable.
Aviator Extraordinaire
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At one point it did have a functional A/T system, but when I got in it the A/T was permanently placarded inop.....Gov Mx doing less with less.
What was interesting was the wiring was telephone wire.
Thanks for helping my memory, again.
On the autopilots, one Monday I took off and the autopilot paddles (switches) would not remain on. So I used a rubber band to keep the paddles connected for the week. For some reason maintenance could not fix it until the weekend. I don't have the foggiest why not. And to be honest I can't remember more than four or five times in ten years that we had autopilot problems with the 727s. So that's pretty good.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't recall seeing anything over 198K unless it was a Boeing built freighter like the Fed Ex model -200F. As recall there was a different structure that increased the empty weight significantly on those aircraft. Do not recall the MTOGW but 208, sounds a little heavy?
The Singapore -212ADV was a 198,000 airplane and that I'm pretty sure of as we bought one from AK and did a corporate conversion on it.
The Singapore -212ADV was a 198,000 airplane and that I'm pretty sure of as we bought one from AK and did a corporate conversion on it.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
By chance do you recall who the operator(s) were that used those weights? I cannot find anything in My Boeing Fleet that talks to those weights but that does not mean that they don't exist.
Aviator Extraordinaire
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very possibly wrong on that.
At 209,000, it must have been every bit the slug w grossed out D-9 powered early -200 was. I can't remember the gross on those were, but it wasn't pretty on a warm day at gross.
GF
GF
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know it wasn't AA. Suspect it had to be freighter as I pretty darn sure that weight was not available for a pax airplane unless in was a one-off corporate/government delivery. AS I mentioned earlier I can't find any reference to that weight in My Boeing Fleet and goes all the way back to the DC7C if you look hard enough
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AA wasn't 209.500. I think the heaviest were 196,000(?).
I think the Alaska 727's we flew during the 'Alaska Airlines Interchange(?)' max'd out around 208,000. We didn't fly them that heavy so we just had the increased thrust to weight ratio of the -17(?) engines vs. the -15/15A engines. It was noticeable.
Trying to remember from 28-30 years ago...
I think the Alaska 727's we flew during the 'Alaska Airlines Interchange(?)' max'd out around 208,000. We didn't fly them that heavy so we just had the increased thrust to weight ratio of the -17(?) engines vs. the -15/15A engines. It was noticeable.
Trying to remember from 28-30 years ago...
Aviator Extraordinaire
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Still better than the ex-Air France 727-200s with the -7 engines. Thank God I never had to fly one, but we almost leased one of them, until we found out that they had the -7 engines.
I can't imagine what a takeoff out of Denver on a summer day would have been like.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Back in the 80's AK was buying both used and factory new 727's. My only experience was the purchase of one of the former 727-212Avd airplanes they had bought from Singapore. Very low time and exceptionally well equipped. These were -17 powered and had a MGTOW or TAXI, can't recall which of 198,000. I believe SIA only had six of these in service.