Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Can automated systems deal with unique events?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Can automated systems deal with unique events?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Nov 2015, 10:26
  #201 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 891
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm in my 30s now. Airlines are still buying A320s and 737 derivatives. I have little doubt that I will retire flying aircraft currently flying now. The 747 and 767 have been with BA 20-30 years. I look forward to retiring off maybe the 380 some time in the 2040s.

If you need one pilot on the aircraft, then quite frankly you need two. I think the vast majority of tasks will be automated, with various forms of computer control, but we are looking at the next generation of clean sheet designs, so 30-50 years away.
Jwscud is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2015, 11:03
  #202 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: on the cusp
Age: 52
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Neville nobody
1. Can autonomous aircraft beat that fatality rate?
2. Can they do it cheaper than pilots do now?
1. Yes, if implemented properly taking in to account a systems design that is fully autonomous. #
2. Absolutely. Pilots are extremely expensive.

# What I would like to know though is where is the optimum? What combination of pilot/aircraft/automation will yield the best return in terms of fuel economy/payload/accident rate/fatality rate. Whatever it is will take a change in attitudes within the design, operating and regulating communities.


Originally Posted by Jwscud
... but we are looking at the next generation of clean sheet designs, so 30-50 years away.
Not necessarily. The majority of latest designs have the necessary infrastructure on board already. If required they could be adapted quite readily with the addition of some computing and tweaking of the existing algorithms. But frankly, where is the need? While the aircraft has to be designed to accommodate people, then having a pilot on board is a small penalty for the massive gain of a highly flexible and capable systems manager, plus a human can bring a lot more to the decision making that just isn't necessary to be considered by a computer, but enhances the whole experience. For a cargo aircraft, that trade off may yield different results.
dClbydalpha is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2015, 11:05
  #203 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jwscud
I'm in my 30s now. Airlines are still buying A320s and 737 derivatives. I have little doubt that I will retire flying aircraft currently flying now. The 747 and 767 have been with BA 20-30 years. I look forward to retiring off maybe the 380 some time in the 2040s.
That is all fine, but we are not talking about the end of manned aircraft, merely the start of unmanned.

Originally Posted by Jwscud
If you need one pilot on the aircraft, then quite frankly you need two.
Umm. I don't know quite where to start with that statement.

If you need one chef in the kitchen, then quite frankly you need two.
If you need one prime minister, then quite frankly you need two.
If you need one midwife, then quite frankly you need two.

You realise that it makes no sense, right?

A huge number of aircraft fly around with one pilot. Many of them carry passengers in airways RVSM etc. As the job gets easier, it is not a great stretch to imagine that one person could do it.
Tourist is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2015, 06:09
  #204 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: england
Posts: 859
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I get the impression that the powers that be aren't planning initially to have only 1 pilot flying an airliner, rather 1 pilot sat in the cockpit during the cruise, whilst the other pilot goes off task for rest. For T/O and Landing, there would be 2 pilots at the controls.
hunterboy is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2015, 12:43
  #205 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,071
Received 138 Likes on 63 Posts
I would counter that the exact opposite will be the case. I think insurance companies are exactly the people who will force it to happen once a body of evidence is gathered to show the safety advantages of autonomous aircraft
Until they have a fatality killing 500 people that a human could have recovered.

The other issue there is actually proving your case to be correct. The amount of autonomous flight data you would need is huge given the number of human powered flights that exist now. Flying a testbed around the world a few times is not the same as the millions of hours that humans put up every year.

And for the insurance companies they have to consider the original title of this thread can computers deal with the weird failures that occur in aviation
neville_nobody is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2015, 12:50
  #206 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regarding the pilot cost question: 1 captain with all the skills and experience and proper salary. 1 cruise pilot, while said captain nods off in a cockpit bunk ready to leap into action if required, paid peanuts. So, 1.25 pilots. Cruise pilot then goes back to smaller jets from whence they came to refresh their techniques, achieve command, and if so desires move unto the sleepy ultra-longhaul single (almost) big jet.
Cruise pilot, during takeoff and landing, is trained thoroughly to move landing gear & flaps, bark & bite captain if he tries to kill anyone and touch a wrong switch, and read any normal/non-normal checklists as needed. Cruise pilots answer to the name of 'Rover'.
RAT 5 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.