ATC requests cloud tops at night
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ATC requests cloud tops at night
Happened the other night while in cruise on a fairly dark night at FL340. No buildups around but there appeared to be significant cloud below. Captain played with the radar and gave a pirep with a specific altitude.
Is there some kind of technique used to determine this or was he really just guessing.
Is there some kind of technique used to determine this or was he really just guessing.
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: EU
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Assuming stabilisation is available and switched on:
Relative height(ft) = (Radar Tilt - Half of beam width) x 100 x Range(nm)
I've never used it and never needed to use it, so don't know how if it works in practice.
Relative height(ft) = (Radar Tilt - Half of beam width) x 100 x Range(nm)
I've never used it and never needed to use it, so don't know how if it works in practice.
Last edited by shaftsburn; 13th Feb 2014 at 10:05.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: europe
Age: 67
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When studying for my exams I was led to believe it was possible, and even got a question on the subject. In practice I have never managed to get it to work, even with the amazing kit we have nowadays. Me thinks BS also.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: .
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably a reasoned guess/(?BS?) - there is no way you can determine cloud tops with radar.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: europe
Age: 67
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From Airbus:
The radar does not detect clouds, fog or wind (droplets are too small, or no precipitation at all). How therefore can wx radar carried in aircraft detect the cloud tops?
The radar does not detect clouds, fog or wind (droplets are too small, or no precipitation at all). How therefore can wx radar carried in aircraft detect the cloud tops?
+1 (actually +lots)
A standard aircraft weather radar cannot be used determine the altitude of the tops of non-convective cloud.....if it did it would be somewhat limited a detecting embedded Cb.
A standard aircraft weather radar cannot be used determine the altitude of the tops of non-convective cloud.....if it did it would be somewhat limited a detecting embedded Cb.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Incredible someone's ego is so HUGE he cannot simply admit, "I do not know the cloud tops."
Really. Who cares?
ATC should have asked some poor turboprop pilot slugging it out in the high teens, low 20s.
Really. Who cares?
ATC should have asked some poor turboprop pilot slugging it out in the high teens, low 20s.
Depends on the clouds. Some non-convective clouds can also be detected.
How many times does it need to be said? Wx radar cannot detect clouds. Period.
It seems astonishing that something so fundamental is being discussed on a "Professional" pilots' forum!
Leaving aside ground and aircraft returns (before some smartarse chimes in) Wx radar can only detect precipitation - and doesn't do too well if it is frozen precip, so unless the cloud has water (rain) droplets or perhaps ice (hail) inside it you won't get a return. Ice as in hail gives a poor return, snow virtually none.
AS there won't be a significant amount of liquid water in cloud at FL300 radar often isn't very helpful up there, and in any case the only (likely weak) return you might get is from the places where hail is present, and that almost certainly won't be at the tops of clouds as hail usually don't go that far up inem, see?
That's why the call it "weather" radar. Because it sees weather
not clouds...
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: .
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so unless the cloud has water (rain) droplets ... inside it you won't get a return.
Yes it's a pedantic point but it is important: Saying that weather radar 'cannot' detect clouds is incorrect. Plain and simple.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pedantic and impractical.
For all PRACTICAL intents and purposes, wx radar as typically installed is not useful in determining cloud tops as originally queried by ATC.
I would have giggled watching someone adjust their wx radar in order to answer this question. I like to tell kids we watch cartoons on those screens when we're bored. Much better chance of THAT!
For all PRACTICAL intents and purposes, wx radar as typically installed is not useful in determining cloud tops as originally queried by ATC.
I would have giggled watching someone adjust their wx radar in order to answer this question. I like to tell kids we watch cartoons on those screens when we're bored. Much better chance of THAT!
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: glendale
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
of all the statements so far, compressor stall has the answer.
you should have asked him. why didn't you?
isn't it possible that he was using the radar to make a quick search for buildups before giving the answer based upon climbout visual observation?
and yes, its true that hail doesn't show up that well on radar, how often have you seen radomes blasted apart by hail.
Its time to acknowledge that if you ask a question and someone calls you ''stupid'' for asking the question, then don't deal with that person anymore (after landing).
I was flying with a copilot back in the 80's in a regional turboprop. It was my habit to have 121.5mhz tuned up to listen for ELTs as we were over very mountainous terrain. We picked up an ELT and reported it to atc.
ATC asked us to take a bearing on it. (get this folks) And my F/O said he would do that. I looked at him and asked him what he intended to use to take a bearing on the signal. And he actually pointed to the ADF.
(oh, for you magenta line kids, that stands for automatic direction finder and it only works in the KHZ range, and low/medium at that)
I calmly picked up the MIC and told him that none of our planes were equipped with VHF DF.
I didn't make the F/O feel bad but I did take the time to explain things.
So, ASK. You might learn something.
Asking on PPRUNE instead of getting it from the horses mouth would be like Buzz Aldrin asking on PPRUNE the thinking process of Neil Armstrong in selecting a landing site.
you should have asked him. why didn't you?
isn't it possible that he was using the radar to make a quick search for buildups before giving the answer based upon climbout visual observation?
and yes, its true that hail doesn't show up that well on radar, how often have you seen radomes blasted apart by hail.
Its time to acknowledge that if you ask a question and someone calls you ''stupid'' for asking the question, then don't deal with that person anymore (after landing).
I was flying with a copilot back in the 80's in a regional turboprop. It was my habit to have 121.5mhz tuned up to listen for ELTs as we were over very mountainous terrain. We picked up an ELT and reported it to atc.
ATC asked us to take a bearing on it. (get this folks) And my F/O said he would do that. I looked at him and asked him what he intended to use to take a bearing on the signal. And he actually pointed to the ADF.
(oh, for you magenta line kids, that stands for automatic direction finder and it only works in the KHZ range, and low/medium at that)
I calmly picked up the MIC and told him that none of our planes were equipped with VHF DF.
I didn't make the F/O feel bad but I did take the time to explain things.
So, ASK. You might learn something.
Asking on PPRUNE instead of getting it from the horses mouth would be like Buzz Aldrin asking on PPRUNE the thinking process of Neil Armstrong in selecting a landing site.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Africa
Age: 57
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Asking on PPRuNe instead of getting it from the horses mouth would be like Buzz Aldrin asking on PPRuNe the thinking process of Neil Armstrong in selecting a landing site.
