Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Automation vs Seat-of-the-pants-flying talking as devil's advocate - so no abuse plea

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Automation vs Seat-of-the-pants-flying talking as devil's advocate - so no abuse plea

Old 18th Sep 2013, 13:30
  #201 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by syseng68k
You could argue that allowing the ins to be reset when the a/c was not on the ground was a system design failure. Even if you could reset with wings level in flight, all you have then is an attitude and perhaps vector reference and not an ins.
Well, that particular aircraft was a 737 Classic, so implementing and retrofitting that kind of lockout would be a significant headache. I can't believe that the restriction on resetting wasn't mentioned in the manual, to be honest!

Some of this kit is just bad by design, but that issue was discussed at length in the AF447 thread with no concensus, fwir :-)...
I wouldn't go so far as to say it was "bad" - as long as it's used correctly, which means thorough training - and maintained correctly, which this aircraft was not. There's a reason Adam Air's operations certificate was withdrawn not too long afterwards.

Of course, AF447 was an Airbus - which tends to bring a whole lot of extra unnecessary baggage to the conversation...
DozyWannabe is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.