Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Transponder code

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Transponder code

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Mar 2013, 13:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: PK
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Transponder code

Hi

In flight - Entering a different FIR - Controller asks for a squawk change

Do we have to select STBY while changing the code as taught in some books or we can straight away change the code (especially in modern equipment installed in B777 etc)

Someone told me that during a code change it automatically stops and there is no need to put it into standby mode

regards
Haroon is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 14:25
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 919
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Transponder code

Hi Haroon,
It all depends ob your type of equipment.
Old school turnknobs - better switch to standby or you might transmit an emergencycode…
New ones - change is normaly possible without standby but its all written down in the appropriate documentation, which should be available to the pilot…
Flying Bull is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 14:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: FL390
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually I've wondered this too although everyone leaves it in TA/RA while changing it and some airports like Stansted say in the jepp brief to set it to 2000 before selecting Standby. From flying school though you got your hand chopped off by an instructor if you tried to change the code before selecting Standby first though.
737aviator is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 15:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do not select standby! ATC will immediately lose you on their screen. You should know your equipment well enough that you don't select an emergency code while switching transponder codes.

This quote is from TC AIM RAC 1.9.1:

ATC radar units are equipped with alarm systems that respond when the aircraft is within radar coverage and the pilot selects the emergency, communication failure or hijack transponder code. It is possible to unintentionally select these codes momentarily when changing the transponder from one code to another. To prevent unnecessary activation of the alarm, pilots should avoid inadvertent selection of 7500, 7600 or 7700 when changing the code if either of the first two digits to be selected is a seven. For example, if it is necessary to change from Code 1700 to Code 7100, first change to Code 1100, then Code 7100, NOT Code 7700 and then Code 7100. Do not select “STANDBY” while changing codes as this will cause the target to be lost on the ATC radar screen.
The only time you select 'standby' is when ATC says "SQUAWK STANDBY" or after landing.

Last edited by italia458; 20th Mar 2013 at 15:09.
italia458 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 15:28
  #5 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The only time you select 'standby' is when ATC says "SQUAWK STANDBY" or after landing.
A slightly definitive answer - when it's not quite like that.

As Flying Bull pointed out, it depends on your equipment. But unless it looks like it still relies on valves, it probably won't cause a problem. In the old days it was SOP to go to STBY primarily to avoid setting off alarms on the radar displays but equipment manufacturers - of both transponders and radar processors - soon started building in what are often called 'slugs', slight delays before believing that a changed code really was the next selected code and transponders effectively switched themselves to STBY while code selections changed. In practice it means that a controller using modern kit will not see the new code until the system detects that it's stopped changing.

Just to make things a bit more complicated - not that it changes anything in practice - a modern radar tracker may use inputs from multiple sensors and has all sorts algorithms going on inside the black box to ignore questionable tx'der responses amongst other things.
 
Old 20th Mar 2013, 15:29
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
great post Italia!
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 16:31
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: PK
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks everyone

started building in what are often called 'slugs', slight delays before believing that a changed code really was the next selected code and transponders effectively switched themselves to STBY while code selections changed.
thats what i was interested in.
Haroon is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 16:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spitoon,

In the old days it was SOP to go to STBY primarily to avoid setting off alarms on the radar displays
Pro tip: Don't select an emergency code when changing transponder codes! I promise you that no alarms will go off if you follow that advice.

Read the last sentence of the quote from TC AIM RAC 1.9.1 I posted above.
italia458 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 16:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haroon,

Be careful about just believing that your equipment will do what Spitoon said. I talked to an IFR controller and he told me that your XPDR code will indicate when you are switching through numbers, as Spitoon said it would, but he said as soon as you select an emergency code it will show up, there is no delay.

To avoid setting off alarms you need to follow the advice of TC AIM RAC 1.9.1. I will paraphrase it: DO NOT SELECT AN EMERGENCY CODE! It's as simple as that.
italia458 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 16:42
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: PK
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
apart from triggering an alarm through an emergency code one can also pass through someone else's code. Dont know how much of a nuisance that can create but perhaps that is also to be avoided as I think I read somewhere.
Haroon is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 16:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haroon,

Don't worry about passing through someone else's code. This isn't rocket-surgery! How on earth are you supposed to know all the other codes that airplanes, being picked up on the same radar screen as you are, would be squawking? And then if you did know them, to move your dials so as not to end up squawking the same code as any other airplane! It's ridiculous!

When ATC says to squawk a code, change to that code immediately and don't select an emergency code. The end.
italia458 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 17:02
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: PK
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its not about "knowing" the codes but "inadvertently" passing through them..

anyway i am not sure if thats an ATC concern or not. i just read it somewhere which i cant remember.

forget about the squawk and please throw some light upon "Rocket-Surgery" is it something like "Brain-Science"
Haroon is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 17:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haroon,

its not about "knowing" the codes but "inadvertently" passing through them..
Come on man! It's 2013... we've had transponders for decades. This isn't a problem!

forget about the squawk and please throw some light upon "Rocket-Surgery" is it something like "Brain-Science"
It's a combination of rocket science and brain surgery, which means it's double-intense! Very similar to a double-rainbow.
italia458 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 17:13
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: PK
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok italia thanks a lot
Haroon is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 22:35
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: canada
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Transponder

What I find strange is that after all these years we only have three emergency codes. I think separate codes for engine fire, hydraulic failure, cargo fire, passenger problem, low fuel, smoke in cabin etc etc would be most helpful. Why are humans just like lumps on a log? We need some thinkers among us.
thermostat is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 23:23
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
On the Airbus fleets in CX we simply push clear then type in the new code using the numerical keypad.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 23:30
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you don't select 7 as your first code just set it. Keep it simple.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 23:41
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: far too low
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by thermostat
What I find strange is that after all these years we only have three emergency codes. I think separate codes for engine fire, hydraulic failure, cargo fire, passenger problem, low fuel, smoke in cabin etc etc would be most helpful. Why are humans just like lumps on a log? We need some thinkers among us.
Or just keep it simple. Getting more codes would lead to more accidental mis-setting. The three codes are enough to alert ATC to a problem, and how they respond won't really affected by the nature of your situation.

The 3 codes puts a big ring around you and alerts all ATC units that can pick you up on secondary. If ATC then need to start looking up codes then they're more likely to lose their eye off the main issue and that is more likely to lead to a mistake.
gorter is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2013, 23:50
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Grobelling through the murk to the sunshine above.
Age: 60
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737aviator

some airports like Stansted say in the jepp brief to set it to 2000 before selecting Standby. From flying school though you got your hand chopped off by an instructor if you tried to change the code before selecting Standby first though.
Can I just point out what the UK AIP, ENR 1.6.2.2.1 (e) tell us:

Code 2000. When entering United Kingdom airspace from an adjacent region where the operation of transponders has not been required; or by Mode S transponder equipped aircraft on the aerodrome surface when under tow, or parked and prior to selecting OFF or STDBY - unless otherwise instructed by ATC.
I believe it's something to do with automatically logging-off the Mode S system. Any ATC people here to explain?
Pub User is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2013, 01:09
  #20 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying Bull:

Hi Haroon,
It all depends ob your type of equipment.
Old school turnknobs - better switch to standby or you might transmit an emergencycode…
New ones - change is normaly possible without standby but its all written down in the appropriate documentation, which should be available to the pilot…
I started with 64 code transponders then after a few years we went to 4096 with Mode C. The company told us to never go to standby when switching codes. Instead, if assigned a code with a leading "7" use your brain to not select, 7500, 7600, or 7700.

Really not exactly rocket science.
aterpster is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.