Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737NG Loss of thrust on both engines

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737NG Loss of thrust on both engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jun 2012, 15:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Turning outbound
Age: 44
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737NG Loss of thrust on both engines

Hello folks
My questions on this memory recall checklist are these:
After completing the memory portion of it it says further down that Do not wait for successful engine start(s) before starting the APU does that mean that as soon as it's recognized that we lost thrust on both engines we can already start the Apu before doing the memory items?
The reason i' m asking this is because the FCTM says:
Initiate the memory portion of the LOSS OF THRUST ON BOTH ENGINES NNC before attempting an APU starts which contradicts part 7 of the checklist.If the windmill restart is not successful,an APU should be initiated as soon as practical to provide electrical power and starter assist during follow-on engine start attempts,then why this is the case?

Best regards
Low-bypass is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2012, 15:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In t'sky
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think this is a case of the application of airmanship. If I recognised a dual engine failure I think one of the first things i'd do is start the APU asap. The QRH to me overrides the FCTM

Horgy
MrHorgy is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2012, 16:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: farmm intersection, our ranch
Age: 57
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just did this in the sim. Started at FL350, .82 / 340KT descent, got engines started at FL200. Engines restarted before the APU was available. I disagree with the checklist in attempting APU starts immediately as you are wasting battery power, and it will not suction feed start above FL250 anyway. The inflight relight was exceedingly slow and could easily be unintentionally interrupted by cycling the fuel lever.
flyingchanges is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2012, 17:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
340? Doesn't the checklist call for 300 kts?
misd-agin is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2012, 01:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: farmm intersection, our ranch
Age: 57
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, but you also need to get down as the cabin goes after about 2 minutes...
flyingchanges is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.