Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737 Mach Crit. Over what part of airframe does shock wave first appear.

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737 Mach Crit. Over what part of airframe does shock wave first appear.

Old 8th Dec 2011, 09:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737 Mach Crit. Over what part of airframe does shock wave first appear.

Mach Crit in the 737. Trivial question I know - but on which part of the airframe does a shock wave first appear?
One opinion is that it is the airflow over the cockpit.
Tee Emm is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 09:57
  #2 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is what I have been told but I never went outside to check.
BOAC is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 10:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GPS L INVALID
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would have put my money on the wing root - or rather at the point of highest camber?
STBYRUD is online now  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 10:56
  #4 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,178
Received 92 Likes on 61 Posts
Generally we can "see" shock waves when air conditions are right either to see the normal light refraction due to density variations or moisture condensation.

YouTube has plenty of clips which let us all see these sorts of phenomena.

For instance, in the
at around 1:50 we can see a number of shocks during a high speed pass, including at the back of the canopy discontinuity .. although one needs to look closely to see the latter. The SR71 model test shows a number of shocks along the aircraft's profile.

shows a spanwise shock over the top surface of a typical jet transport.

As to exactly where shocks initially form on a given aircraft will depend on the particular aircraft profile.

.. I make no comment about the dreadful background music which some seem convinced is mandatory for YouTube clips ...
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 11:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very much dependent on aircraft type.
Used to get it a lot in the Classic 737 whenever getting closer to Coffins Corner and pulling the slightest bit of G at the same time. Buffetting through the yoke.
Shaka Zulu is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 11:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Tee Emm,

There's an interesting explanation about why a shock wave can form early over the flight deck window / fuselage area from 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 5 - 8 January 2004, Reno, Nevada:
http://www.aer.ita.br/~bmattos/downl...elage_aiaa.pdf

Page 3
"However, this apparently simple nature of the flow leads to complex consequences. As an example, the flow over the cockpit region can develop shock waves. The main reason behind this phenomenon is related to the shorter path that the flow follow from the standstill state in front of windshield to the freestream level at the beginning of the central fuselage. The shorter the path, the higher the speed of the flow along the cockpit curvature that eventually leads to shock wave formation depending on the fuselage shape and freestream Mach number."
rudderrudderrat is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 17:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: EU-USA
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I can remember after reading "Fly the wing" and "Turbine pilot's manual" usually it forms on the wing first(usually). Always wondered where this first happens on the 737 airframe.

With mach trim inoperative our mach number is limited to .74, so I assume its somwhere around .73..(Think I read it somewhere before, maybe even in 737tech site or Eric Parks' notes, just can't be sure enough to confirm).
VLADKO is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 19:13
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: England
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to recall that on the 747 it first appeared on the top of the "hump" as that had a profile that accelerated the airflow to Mcrit before the wing. The 737 doesn't have that so my guess is that it would be at the wing root which has a higher incidence than the tip (washout). Don't shoot me if I'm wrong!
davidjh is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2011, 20:12
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Dallas, TX USA
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've often seen a small shock wave just inboard of the nacelle on a 737NG, just aft of the leading edge on top of the wing.
Flight Safety is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2011, 09:57
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you all very much for these replies.
TM
Tee Emm is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2011, 07:51
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: A few degrees South
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well it is a critical Mach nr. We are talking about your wing developing lift, no?
latetonite is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2011, 21:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Norway
Age: 40
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's actually an interesting question, especially relating to the mach trim. The mach trim on the 737 NG starts to function at M 0.615, but if it fails the restriction is 280 kts. / M 0.82. In other words it restricts the amount of knots (max is 340) but not Mach (max is 0.82).

I've assumed there isn't any restriction on the mach due to relatively low mach tuck tendencies and that this system exists only due to regulatory compliance, but I don't know why there's a restriction on the amount of knots.

Any smart heads in here that can enlighten me/us?
KristianNorway is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2011, 23:21
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Aspen, Colorado
Age: 86
Posts: 16
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
737NG VMO/MMO is limited by the shape of the rear of the fuselage. NG wing is based on the 757 so can go a lot faster than .82. 737 Classic had fatter wing so was probably limited by the wing?
Hunter S Thompson is online now  
Old 14th Dec 2011, 01:48
  #14 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,178
Received 92 Likes on 61 Posts
VMO/MMO is limited by the shape of the rear of the fuselage

Interesting. Do you have any amplification on that ?
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2011, 02:06
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Aspen, Colorado
Age: 86
Posts: 16
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi John,

Boeing factory instructors did our line conversion when we first got the NG and that was the information they passed along. The NG really is a hybrid, that fuselage shape was originally designed for the slower -100. That's also the reason the NG cruises economically so close to MMO.
Hunter S Thompson is online now  
Old 14th Dec 2011, 02:14
  #16 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,178
Received 92 Likes on 61 Posts
Thanks for that. I can see a reason for Mmo but not Vmo. Perhaps others reading may have further knowledge of the matter ?
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2011, 08:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 398
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NG wing is based on the 757 so can go a lot faster than .82.
I was told that the -NG's wing was actually a scaled down 777 wing when I did a conversion course in Seattle. The engineer went on to tell us that R&D funds were fairly tight as it wasn't envisaged that the -NG would be a big seller, but that in the engineer's opinion a bit more time and money spent on the -NG's wing would probably have yielded 777 speeds! I guess we may never know.

I also remember reading somewhere that the tailcone section is an area of high drag on the original 737, hence the proposed re-design on the 737 MAX.

I recall flying with a Capt. years ago who would fly at the max CI (200?) on the classics on the last flight to get home. You could certainly feel a "rumble" from the wings, was that Mcrit over the wing being reached? I don't know!
Capt Chambo is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2011, 11:22
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You could certainly feel a "rumble" from the wings, was that Mcrit over the wing being reached?
One would hope the management would soon `rumble` to that trick and either sack the bastard or fine him for loss of revenue
Tee Emm is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2012, 11:44
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 56
Posts: 3,079
Received 440 Likes on 121 Posts
I'd be interested to know how the VMO/MMO was determined on the 737-800. Anyone know?
framer is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2012, 12:11
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: FUBAR
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought most of the forward & aft fuselage design owed more than a little to the 707, what sort of MMO was that limited to?
If you have a look up & forward at the cockpit section of a B52 from below & behind the cockpit window you will also see the same shape. One size fits all for Boeing
Certainly the radical difference in the wing between the Classic & NG would lend support to that area not being limiting.
captplaystation is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.