Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

The Boeing 737.......your grandfather's technology........tomorrow.

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

The Boeing 737.......your grandfather's technology........tomorrow.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 18:14
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,188
Received 382 Likes on 236 Posts
Closing the B757 line was probably the worst move Boeing has made in centuries.
Sorry to see that one go. The few times I flew on them as a pax I found them more than suitable, as air transport goes.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 18:16
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GPS L INVALID
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, Airbus managed to modify the gear (albeit only the nose gear) on the A330 for the freighter and retained certification, so raising the 737 to make room for the LEAP-X should be possible, shouldn't it? Not that I know that much about A/C certification apart from some dangerous half-knowledge
STBYRUD is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 20:20
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,188
Received 382 Likes on 236 Posts
glad rag, appreciate the reply.

My mind goes back to the F-18C/D and the F-18 E/F, and the dispute at the time that the latter was actually a new aircraft/TMS ... so I think I get a little of where the certification concerns might be.

(Grandfathered, are you?)

And I now suspect a pun in the post's title.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 21:16
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,410
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Lonewolf 50

The Navy Captain who got the F/A-18 E/F passed Congress got the two stars for his powers of persuasion! He was my brother's boss.

GF
galaxy flyer is online now  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 21:51
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, Airbus managed to modify the gear (albeit only the nose gear) on the A330 for the freighter and retained certification, so raising the 737 to make room for the LEAP-X should be possible, shouldn't it?
Boeing already stated the need to redesign the wingbox and gear...not to mention the electronics/avionics...this is a major endeavor that they tried to avoid. It is possible, just very expensive...
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 21:59
  #26 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My money is on Boeing, they have got their decisions concerning Airbus right so far, they said the A380 would be a commercial failure and so far it is, not even close to break-even. Boeing saw this and offered them a consortium to spread the cost and increase the likely market, Airbus said 'No', Boeing pulled out of the race.

From a passenger comfort point of view the B737 has the A320 beaten into a cocked hat, from the passenger seats the A320 sounds like a farm tractor on Speed, a deafening racket.
parabellum is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2011, 23:13
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually deadheading i prefer the A320, more space as the fuselage is wider. Flying the 737, and from a fuel usage point of view the 737 beats the A320 series currently for us.
Denti is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 00:28
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: engineer at large
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would have to agree Denti, many of the airlines, specifically Virgin variants, have really optimized the AB platform..
while the Boeing jet may save fuel, the Airbus airlines have overall comfort and wizbang toys for the consumer nailed.
The touch screen for ordering drinks has my vote!
FlightPathOBN is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 06:08
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
Age: 79
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As an old fat pax, I am qualified to speak from the passenger perspective. I cringe a bit when I see any sector I'm on longer than about an hour is being operated by a 737; I know the difference in cabin width is fairly small, and varies depending on the point at which you measure it, but it's enough to make a difference to the guy in the middle seat. As for noise, can't say I've noticed much difference.

Whether pax preference makes much difference in choice of equipment these days is another question, but was it a factor in the end of the 757?
FlightlessParrot is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2011, 17:58
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Whereever I lay my hat
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Roof up or down?

from the passenger seats the A320 sounds like a farm tractor on Speed, a deafening racket.
As far as I know only the B-737 has flown as a convertibel , somewhere over the Hawaian islands...
KiloMikePapa is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.