Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Windmilling propellers

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Windmilling propellers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jul 2010, 11:32
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,792
Received 115 Likes on 55 Posts
Originally Posted by johns7022
How about a raise of hands...everyone in here with an MEI that has actually taken up a student, shut down an engine on a muti-engine turbocharged aircraft, feathered a prop, then started it back up....
The point is, have you done the same in a supercharged engine?

(my hand is up)
I think you can put your hand down now.
Checkboard is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2010, 14:24
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: the pub
Age: 57
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My gawd 95 posts arguing about what happens when you shut off an engine in flight?
Nice that you noticed how many there were.

Shame you didn't read and digest the content before wading in.
one dot right is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2010, 14:10
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: RH base 36R
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It shouldn't come as a big surprise that we are not the first to contemplate this matter.

This text, "Gauge Indications on a Failed Engine", Warbird Notes #6 was written by Mr. Randy Sohn in 1994.

I have no way of knowing whether Mr. Sohn is correct in everything he writes, but he does appear to carry a lot more credibility than most if not all of us here: Randy Sohn .

An index to all of his "Warbird Notes" can be found here Warbird Notes INDEX . Highly recommended!
MoodyBlue is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2010, 14:30
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I think one person here knows of burnt 'flatnose' with Big Ernie

Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2010, 16:16
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 791
Received 34 Likes on 11 Posts
Thank you Moody Blue. At last a reference, as opposed to someone telling us what he thinks will happen.
"Cut a mixture and just leave the throttle alone where it was set at cruise, lets say, for example in this case, 27". If you can visualize a big air pump, that is exactly what the engine is, with the throttle located at the intake. After seeing for yourself that the MP stays unmoving at 27" ....."
"The engine keeps turning and as long as it does the oil pump keeps pumping, right? So the oil pressure stays up and doesn't give you a clue about which one failed. Over the short period we're discussing here the temperature stays up too."
"When we cut the mixture at cruise airspeed the RPM sagged about a hundred and then went right back to where it had been. Let's analyze that for a minute. The engine is still turning so the oil pump is still putting out normal pressure. Where does the prop governor get its supply? That's right, from engine oil pressure. So it keeps doing its thing according to your request through the prop control. You had the control set to cruise RPM so (after a second or two of decrease followed by an immediate increase as the blades assume a new angle) that's what it delivers. It will as long as it has oil pressure and, with this proviso, that the cruise speed stays high enough so that the blades don't reach the pitch stops while trying to maintain the requested RPM."
This all exactly what virgo wanted confirmed, and exactly what a few of us who have actually flown supercharged (NOT turbocharged) multi's have been saying
oxenos is online now  
Old 10th Jul 2010, 13:26
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but he does appear to carry a lot more credibility than most if not all of us here: Randy Sohn .
Unfortunately, Sohn is just slightly wrong with a couple of the previously mentioned engines I referenced earlier (both supercharged)...namely, the Pratt&Whitney R4360 and the CurtisWright R3350-EA4 trubocompound...a slight MP reduction will ne observed....two to three inches, all due to the effects I mentioned previously.
Perhaps Sohn hasn't flown these types..IE, only concerned himself with 'warbird' types...
411A is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2010, 18:46
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: RH base 36R
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
but he does appear to carry a lot more credibility than most if not all of us here: Randy Sohn .
I knew I should have stuck with "most of us here" i.s.o. "most if not all of us here"...

I only know the R4360 and R3350 from museums, they certainly are different beasts than the R-1830 (the one radial I know a bit about) so I wouldn't have a clue as to who's "right" here. It could indeed very well be that there's a difference in behaviour between these types of engines, and you are both right... now wouldn't that be nice...

Looks to me like we're not going to get the definitive answer - but the good thing is that we did get to learn something maybe (I sure did)
MoodyBlue is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2010, 23:37
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: on the edge
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah is most satisfying when theory and the reality coincide.

BH
blackhand is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.