Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B-757 bleed off TO without APU

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B-757 bleed off TO without APU

Old 30th Jul 2009, 13:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Russia
Age: 47
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B-757 bleed off TO without APU

Hello from Russia. Could You help me with next qwestion.
Am i allowed to take off with bleed off with APU unavailable? There is no such proceduren in OM. But our engines are going to exceed max EGT during TO. And can decrease power below 400 feet. Thanks.
izrailev is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2009, 13:07
  #2 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Certainly can in a 737 - it is in Supplementary Procedures. Not sure what you mean by the last sentence?
BOAC is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2009, 13:29
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Russia
Age: 47
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So i meen can i decrease power below 400 feet in case EGT is going to reach the limit. And bleeds of TO is not supplementary procedure for 757.
izrailev is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2009, 15:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vermont
Age: 67
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Boeing generic FCOM contains procedures for a PACKS OFF TAKEOFF and an APU TO PACK TAKEOFF. There is no procedure specifically for a bleeds off takeoff, although the APU TO PACK procedure states that it is "used for making a takeoff with no bleed air supplied from the engines".

The generic FCOM is not specific to a particular aircraft serial number, and there may be other procedures out there; but this is all I can find without access to your company's Boeing documents.

Would a packs off takeoff satisfy the requirements? This procedure makes no reference to an APU requirement.
Mansfield is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2009, 10:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the 757 the Packs Off take-off is effectively an unpressurised take-off. The procedure is to restore 1 pack after 1st thrust reduction and the 2nd when pressurisation stabilises.
The unpressurised take-off is no big deal, done it several times; as previously stated, the Boeing procedure makes no reference to the APU (in the Packs Off take-off)
Using the APU on take-off gives a performance penalty due to the intake door sticking out in the breeze, and APU to Pack take-off may not be used in Icing conditions.
As far as I know, there is no Bleeds Off procedure for take-off.
ajd1 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2009, 13:54
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Russia
Age: 47
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks a lot but I still don't have answer. I know about packs off TO, but I need exactly bleed off TO with APU inoperative. Is it legal or not? Reason that this procedure will decrease EGT much more then packs off.
And another qwestion: can i decrease power below 400' not to exceed EGT limit? With best regards.
izrailev is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2009, 14:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can only talk about the 757 with RB211 535E4 engines. I have many thousands of hours on the type and have never seen the the EGT close to limits.
I say again, as far as I know there is no 757 procedure for a Bleeds Off take-off.
As for reducing thrust below 400', this would have performance implications .. the usual is 1000'agl or 1500'agl.
ajd1 is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2009, 15:10
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Packs off eliminates the bleed demand from the engines and should give you the same performance as bleeds off. Turning the bleeds off when the packs are off is redundant and will not achieve any performance improvement. There may be a miniscule amount of bleed used to pressurize the potable water tank but if so it will not be measureable.
Tree is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2009, 18:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly...
ajd1 is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2009, 09:27
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Middle of Somewhere..
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know this doesn't help much but it sounds as though the engines on the A/C are near the end of their life (i.e. time for an overhaul) if they're reaching EGT limits this frequently. Perhaps your airline could do a compressor wash to regain the EGT margin and therefore eliminate the problem of EGT exceedances with engine bleed on?
Papa2Charlie is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2009, 15:44
  #11 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Age: 49
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
izrailev

I believe you may be confusing your aircraft supply bleeds with the bleed valves that open or close venting bleed air on a RB211 as it has no VSV's for power managment. The supply bleed valves being off have no effect on EGT limitation. The IP6, HP2 and HP3 valves perform this function.
muduckace is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2009, 16:52
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southeast U K
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does the MEL not have anything to say on the subject?
I would have thought that it is very undesirable to take
off without the cabin being pressurized to some degree?
Sounds as though the engines and APU need a good dose
of down time and sorting out the problems.
Storminnorm is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2009, 23:50
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Here and there...
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An inop APU should not have any impact on the EGT of the engines. Not during T/O or any other condition.

The 75īs usually have a 5- or 10 minute T/O thrust limit. By that time you should have passed 400', so if it is required to select climb thrust before that height, something is deeply wrong with the engines.

During normal operations APU is shut down prior to T/O, so again taking off should never be a problem on that aircraft with a APU inop. But if you have to select climb thrust before 400', then you have a problem.

Rgds-
Bluebird is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2009, 00:25
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: England
Posts: 123
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Backtrack, surely you have come close though once or twice on the 767, maybe out of CUN?
John Boeman is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2009, 16:36
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Takeoff with one bleed off because it is u/s may be allowed subject to a number of restrictions. See your MEL.

You cannot accept an engine excedence except in an extreme emergency. You should reduce power so as not to exceed the EGT limit. You probably have a tired engine with a full power takeoff, a high surface temperature or a low level inversion.

It should only require a very small power reduction after selecting gear up to keep the engine in limits. Make a tech log entry, speak to your engineering dept and the chief pilot.

Last edited by spacegrand; 2nd Aug 2009 at 17:02.
spacegrand is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.