Max Operating Altitude for Flaps
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: berlin
Age: 31
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Max Operating Altitude for Flaps
Hi,
I am not a commercial pilot. Could somebody pls explain why 20000 feet( Airbus) is the max operating alt for Flaps Extension.
Thanks a lot
I am not a commercial pilot. Could somebody pls explain why 20000 feet( Airbus) is the max operating alt for Flaps Extension.
Thanks a lot
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AEP
Age: 80
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not an Airbus pilot, but I am certain the explanation is same as for Boeings.
20,000 feet is an arbitrary limit.
Below 20,000 feet - flaps speed limits are V speeds. There are such limits.
Above 20,000, should be a Mach number limit, but none are given.
So they just limit flaps operation to 20,000 maximum.
Douglas, to compare, had no altitude limits (DC-8) -
They had flaps VFE 230 KIAS or Mach .46...
xxx
Happy contrails
20,000 feet is an arbitrary limit.
Below 20,000 feet - flaps speed limits are V speeds. There are such limits.
Above 20,000, should be a Mach number limit, but none are given.
So they just limit flaps operation to 20,000 maximum.
Douglas, to compare, had no altitude limits (DC-8) -
They had flaps VFE 230 KIAS or Mach .46...
xxx
Happy contrails
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flaps.
Long ago, we had a new Captain on the 'ole L1011 at SV who decided it was a good idea, having just received an ATC instruction to cross ElDaba at a later time, decide that flaps/slats at FL330 was a good idea.
Opps.
They extended alright....at M.75
One slat section was torn off straightaway, and one more departed on the diversion to Cairo.
He was sacked.
No altitude restriction was listed in the AFM, however...it did say max Mach number, .50.
Guess he failed to read that part...
Long ago, we had a new Captain on the 'ole L1011 at SV who decided it was a good idea, having just received an ATC instruction to cross ElDaba at a later time, decide that flaps/slats at FL330 was a good idea.
Opps.
They extended alright....at M.75
One slat section was torn off straightaway, and one more departed on the diversion to Cairo.
He was sacked.
No altitude restriction was listed in the AFM, however...it did say max Mach number, .50.
Guess he failed to read that part...
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 日本
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to admit I'd never really given this too much thought. Mr Boeing says don't chuck the flaps out >20000', so I don't. However, BelArg's post got me thinking (which is not pretty at the best of times).
We know we don't put the flaps out at too high a speed because they will get damaged by the number of Bernoulli's hitting them (I like to keep things simple in my mind
). The higher the speed, the more Bernoulli's. Now, we also know that the only measure we have of the number of Bernoulli's in the air is INDICATED airspeed. So, given that, why would a manafacturer either put an altitude limit or a mach number limit on the flaps? Surely you can just stick with an IAS limit because that will measure the Bernoulli's in the air no matter what your altitude.
It obviously doens't really affect the price of fish. I'm not going to use the flaps that high and I have no intention of chucking them out too fast but I was just wondering why they just don't stick to an IAS limit and have one fewer line in the limitations chapter.
We know we don't put the flaps out at too high a speed because they will get damaged by the number of Bernoulli's hitting them (I like to keep things simple in my mind
). The higher the speed, the more Bernoulli's. Now, we also know that the only measure we have of the number of Bernoulli's in the air is INDICATED airspeed. So, given that, why would a manafacturer either put an altitude limit or a mach number limit on the flaps? Surely you can just stick with an IAS limit because that will measure the Bernoulli's in the air no matter what your altitude.It obviously doens't really affect the price of fish. I'm not going to use the flaps that high and I have no intention of chucking them out too fast but I was just wondering why they just don't stick to an IAS limit and have one fewer line in the limitations chapter.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In some cases you may find that the alt restriction is as much due to not having tested there as any hard system or aerodynamic limitation.
No-one tests more than they need to for cert, so if *we* decided no-one will need flaps above alt X, that's all *we* will test.
Usually you think in terms of "what's the max alt we'll use for TO or landing" then "whats a reasonable margin above that for ops" and presto - flaps altitude limit.
No-one tests more than they need to for cert, so if *we* decided no-one will need flaps above alt X, that's all *we* will test.
Usually you think in terms of "what's the max alt we'll use for TO or landing" then "whats a reasonable margin above that for ops" and presto - flaps altitude limit.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another point is the terminus "operating"....
Let's say you have an aircraft which may take off with slats only. After take off you find slats are not willing to retract. For my understanding it's legal to climb above 20k feet observing Vfe (250kts) and continue to destination (short sector), fuel permitting, cause you don't "operate" = move the flaps/slats.
Let's say you have an aircraft which may take off with slats only. After take off you find slats are not willing to retract. For my understanding it's legal to climb above 20k feet observing Vfe (250kts) and continue to destination (short sector), fuel permitting, cause you don't "operate" = move the flaps/slats.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's what my book says:
Max. operating altitude for slat operation or flaps extended is 20 000 ft.
And it also says if flights are conducted with Slats extended refer to the chart above to selct altitude.
Max. operating altitude for slat operation or flaps extended is 20 000 ft.
And it also says if flights are conducted with Slats extended refer to the chart above to selct altitude.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Liège, Belgium
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 737 FCTM says it quite nicely:
The limit of 20000ft for flaps extension is there only because there isn't any airport in the world where an extention of flaps above 20000 would be necessary.
Hence we didn't tested them above that altitude.
The limit of 20000ft for flaps extension is there only because there isn't any airport in the world where an extention of flaps above 20000 would be necessary.
Hence we didn't tested them above that altitude.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surely you can just stick with an IAS limit because that will measure the Bernoulli's in the air no matter what your altitude.
High lift wings can have transonic (and also >M 1.0) flow at aircraft subsonic speeds as low as M0.5-0.6, as all those high lift devices do wonders to pressure differentials. In other words, the wing goes transonic WELL before the aircraft does.
As an aside, one of the big design problems for designers isnt only wing transonics, its the flow between nacelles. You put them too close together and you get a lovely convergen divergent duct to accelerate flow with... and nasty weak shocks that do wonders for engine mount fatigue.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another point is the terminus "operating"....
Let's say you have an aircraft which may take off with slats only. After take off you find slats are not willing to retract. For my understanding it's legal to climb above 20k feet observing Vfe (250kts) and continue to destination (short sector), fuel permitting, cause you don't "operate" = move the flaps/slats.
Let's say you have an aircraft which may take off with slats only. After take off you find slats are not willing to retract. For my understanding it's legal to climb above 20k feet observing Vfe (250kts) and continue to destination (short sector), fuel permitting, cause you don't "operate" = move the flaps/slats.
The "operating" refers to operating of the aircraft - as in Vmo for example.
Getting the flaps out at 19,999ft and then happily flying around at 30,000ft+ is (a) a false interpretation of the manual; and (b) asking for trouble.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hell, even non-slatted aircraft can generate transonic flow locally at VERY low free stream Mach numbers, under the right conditions (CL etc).
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There were a number of inadvertant slat extensions on the MD11 before they redesigned the flap/slat handle. Made for some interesting gyrations when this happened at .83
I believe that the flaps will not extend on the B777 even if the handle is moved out of the up position.
I believe that the flaps will not extend on the B777 even if the handle is moved out of the up position.
Dog Tired
Now, here's a real anorak's Airbus 320 fact:
Who knows when VFEnext appears on the PFD speed tape during descent?
Those paying attention to the above will realise it is FL 200 (the limit for flap extension).
Not a lot of people know that.
f
Who knows when VFEnext appears on the PFD speed tape during descent?
Those paying attention to the above will realise it is FL 200 (the limit for flap extension).
Not a lot of people know that.
f
