Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

LGCIU 1+2 fault & abnormal LG landing

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

LGCIU 1+2 fault & abnormal LG landing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Feb 2009, 13:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moscow
Age: 48
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LGCIU 1+2 fault & abnormal LG landing

Is it wise to use Abnormal LG landing QRH procedure after double LGCIU failure (LGCIU 1 is not electrically connected, so no indication)? If it is reasonable:
1. Is it wise to fly low pass?
2. How do we have to fullfill some sections of this procedure with IF conditions (and no condition for unknown LG position at all).
Boroda is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 16:31
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moscow
Age: 48
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, nobody knows... And Airbus politely avoids recommendetions after such a fault.
Boroda is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 20:59
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: way down south
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I personally would do as much of the abnormal landing gear checklist as practical. As to doing a low fly-by seems pretty pointless to me since they can only really advise you that the gear APPEARS down & also when were we last trained to fly down a r/w level at 100'?
Mephistopheles is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2009, 20:31
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You don't need to fly as low as 100 feet - they have binoculars in the tower.
TyroPicard is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2009, 22:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: way down south
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TyroPicard I guess they could use them as long as it's during the day or good vis. Also Airbuses do not have any visual downlock indications visible from inside or outside the a/c. So I still do not see the point of doing a low pass over the r/w.
Mephistopheles is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2009, 01:45
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it wise to use Abnormal LG landing QRH procedure after double LGCIU failure (LGCIU 1 is not electrically connected, so no indication)? If it is reasonable:
To have no gear down indication you need a triple failure on the A330/340
If one LGCIU fails the other LGCIU takes over control, and a diminished gear/door indication is shown on the SD page, if the remaining LGCIU fails you will still have gear down indication via a hard wired circuit inside LGCIU in the #1 position., even if the LGCIU 1 is failed. This indication circuit is still powered to provide the 3 gear indication triangles adjacent the gear lever.


LGCIU 1 is not electrically connected?
Do you mean not fitted to the rack..
In my fleet LGCIU #1 must be operating, ..The only MEL/DDG relief is for LGCIU 2.

As far as fly past to check gear down, ??????
Bolty McBolt is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2009, 08:14
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moscow
Age: 48
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bolty,

sorry - I did not mentioned my type - it is Airbus, but 320.
So gears are not hard wired to indication and we have only two LGCIUs. Yes, in some failures it could be indications, but not for sure. I take the worst situation and wonder.

Thanks for responses
Boroda is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.