What is windshear
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is windshear
Does anybody have a definition of windshear. We often report to ATC windshear on approach when really it was probably just turbulence. Different authorities define it differently - FAA,CASA,CAD etc.
But what is it. 15 knots or greater sounds familiar but over what period of time.
any thoughts.
And while i am in a posing question mood, what is freezing fog.
Does temp below fzg combined with fog constitute fzg fog. A meteorologist would say no, it depends on things like the moisture content of the air and the liklyhood of super cooled water droplets.
But from an aviation point of view (A330 ground ice shedding proc) when do we consider fzg fog?
But what is it. 15 knots or greater sounds familiar but over what period of time.
any thoughts.
And while i am in a posing question mood, what is freezing fog.
Does temp below fzg combined with fog constitute fzg fog. A meteorologist would say no, it depends on things like the moisture content of the air and the liklyhood of super cooled water droplets.
But from an aviation point of view (A330 ground ice shedding proc) when do we consider fzg fog?
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Uptown
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For windshear, try this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_shear
For freezing fog, try this link:
http://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints/359/
Happy reading......
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_shear
For freezing fog, try this link:
http://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints/359/
Happy reading......
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's another reference for you - not that you're necessarily interested in wind shear training in a simulator - but it does give some good information on the subject...
http://www.faa.gov/safety/programs_i...edia/03-05.pdf
http://www.faa.gov/safety/programs_i...edia/03-05.pdf
ICAO Windshear guidelines
oicur12.............
From ICAO 1987 Windshear publication (ICAO Circular 186-AN/122):
The ICAO guidelines for unacceptable flight path degradations in windshear are:
Takeoff and approach:
and:
Approach:
Hope this helps.
From ICAO 1987 Windshear publication (ICAO Circular 186-AN/122):
Windshear, being the change of wind vector from one point in space to another, is given by the vector difference between the winds at the two points, which itself is a vector(having both speed and direction). The intensity of the shear is calculated by dividing the magnitude of the vector difference between the two points by the distance between them, using consistent units.The calculation of the shear may be done graphically using the triangle of velocities or by subtraction of the components of the two wind vectors either manually or by computer or by trigonometry.
Takeoff and approach:
- + or - 15kts IAS
- + or - 500 FPM V/S
- + or - 5 degrees pitch attitude
and:
Approach:
- + or - 1 dot glideslope displacement
- unusual thrust lever position for a significant period of time
Hope this helps.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Windshear, being the change of wind vector from one point in space to another, is given by the vector difference between the winds at the two points, which itself is a vector(having both speed and direction). The intensity of the shear is calculated by dividing the magnitude of the vector difference between the two points by the distance between them, using consistent units.The calculation of the shear may be done graphically using the triangle of velocities or by subtraction of the components of the two wind vectors either manually or by computer or by trigonometry.
That hurt my brain
That hurt my brain
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: North of a Border!
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMO Windshear is often reported incorrectly.
A turbulent approach where windspeed is constantly jumping up and down 10 kts is very different from an approach where true windshear gives a clear gain OR loss of 15+ Kts and the speed holds for some 5 or more seconds.
I have been asked many times by ATC if I experienced windshear during turbulent conditions? My reply is "Negative, just a bit turbulent" Then I hear the following aircraft report Windshear
Why do I post this? I am no sky god and I respect the views of fellow pilots but if we all shout 'windshear' during turbulent weather.... When there really is Windshear and it has been correctly reported on ATIS or other, we may fall into the 'cry wolf' situation and then get caught out when true windshear hits us hard!
A turbulent approach where windspeed is constantly jumping up and down 10 kts is very different from an approach where true windshear gives a clear gain OR loss of 15+ Kts and the speed holds for some 5 or more seconds.
I have been asked many times by ATC if I experienced windshear during turbulent conditions? My reply is "Negative, just a bit turbulent" Then I hear the following aircraft report Windshear
Why do I post this? I am no sky god and I respect the views of fellow pilots but if we all shout 'windshear' during turbulent weather.... When there really is Windshear and it has been correctly reported on ATIS or other, we may fall into the 'cry wolf' situation and then get caught out when true windshear hits us hard!
Last edited by rada76; 5th May 2008 at 21:24. Reason: Spelling
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Over the clouds
Age: 65
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMO Windshear is often reported incorrectly.
I have been asked many times by ATC if I experienced windshear during turbulent conditions? My reply is "Negative, just a bit turbulent" Then I hear the following aircraft report Windshear
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florence,AZ
Age: 81
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 1977 edition of the Jeppeson annual contains an excellent review of the Eastern Airlines 727 crash at JFK due to a downburst cell over the end of runway 22. A professor at the University of Chicago conducted a study of downburst cells and published the study results around that same timeframe.
I had the opportunity to work with Paul Kadlec, Chief Meterologist at Continental Airlines, in 1976. I spent a lot of time riding jumpseat with CO and others, talking with crew about the use of weather radar.
Paul is a great guy, also a BG in the USAF. He studied the CO 727 crash at Denver and develoed a theory about micro bursts which he believed caused that accident. Theory had to do with warm, dry climates and a temp/dewpoint spread of 40 degrees.
I really enjoyed the time I spent in the "front office" in '76. I also flew with Frontier, Hughes Airwest, Western, Hawaiian, Mexicana, Avianca, Air Micronesia and All Nippon.
Putt
I had the opportunity to work with Paul Kadlec, Chief Meterologist at Continental Airlines, in 1976. I spent a lot of time riding jumpseat with CO and others, talking with crew about the use of weather radar.
Paul is a great guy, also a BG in the USAF. He studied the CO 727 crash at Denver and develoed a theory about micro bursts which he believed caused that accident. Theory had to do with warm, dry climates and a temp/dewpoint spread of 40 degrees.
I really enjoyed the time I spent in the "front office" in '76. I also flew with Frontier, Hughes Airwest, Western, Hawaiian, Mexicana, Avianca, Air Micronesia and All Nippon.
Putt