Airbus A319/320/321 - "Flex Temp"
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: the dark side of the moon!
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Airbus A319/320/321 - "Flex Temp"
Good Evening,
Just looking for some info from Airbus crews. I completed my A319/320/321 CRS course earlier this year and we kind of stuck to the "engineery" bit of the throttle system/engine controls/ECAM etc, only really mentioning "FLX/MCT" as a throttle detent. I haven't had much hands on with the aircraft yet hence the following request.
I've had a read through the back of the 320 performance manual which had a brief single page on flex temp and a couple of charts but to be perfectly honest it didn't really help much in my understanding of what/how it all goes together.
My (possibly wrong!) understanding is that flex temp is a crew selection made into the FMGC/FMS based on aircraft weight and environmental conditions - yes/no?! What I don'treally understand is how do you derive what the flex temp setting is and what does this give you in terms of N1/N2
I was wondering if someone would be kind enough to either direct me to some good simple explanation somewhere (internet sites, manuals etc) or explain it in relatively simple terms (I'm not crew, but a Licensed Eng!!)
Any help in learning something new and a little bit more in depth would be appreciated, thank's in advance.
Rgds,
Eng
Just looking for some info from Airbus crews. I completed my A319/320/321 CRS course earlier this year and we kind of stuck to the "engineery" bit of the throttle system/engine controls/ECAM etc, only really mentioning "FLX/MCT" as a throttle detent. I haven't had much hands on with the aircraft yet hence the following request.
I've had a read through the back of the 320 performance manual which had a brief single page on flex temp and a couple of charts but to be perfectly honest it didn't really help much in my understanding of what/how it all goes together.
My (possibly wrong!) understanding is that flex temp is a crew selection made into the FMGC/FMS based on aircraft weight and environmental conditions - yes/no?! What I don'treally understand is how do you derive what the flex temp setting is and what does this give you in terms of N1/N2
I was wondering if someone would be kind enough to either direct me to some good simple explanation somewhere (internet sites, manuals etc) or explain it in relatively simple terms (I'm not crew, but a Licensed Eng!!)
Any help in learning something new and a little bit more in depth would be appreciated, thank's in advance.
Rgds,
Eng
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
flex temp is a crew selection made into the FMGC/FMS based on aircraft weight and environmental conditions
how do you derive what the flex temp setting is and what does this give you in terms of N1/N2
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth
Age: 61
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In simple terms, “Flex” is an assumed temperate used to prolong engine life.
On a given day, and a given temperature, you have to determine the thrust requirement that your aircraft needs to achieve a specified climb requirement from a given runway.
Now, if you can achieve that required amount of climb on a much warmer day, then obviously the amount of engine power (output) required -with the hotter temperature - would be less. (We are talking about the power output, or the WORK that the engine has to do)
So, you make the take-off calculations based on the much hotter temperature. If, in fact, you can make the required climb performance with those assumed higher temperatures, you now have a “flex” condition.
You tell the FADEC (MCDU Entry) that the temperature is higher (e.g. 58 degrees) than the actual temperature. Then, the engine power output becomes that which would reflect a 58 degree day, thus less engine power output is developed, but the required amount for the assumed hotter temperature is developed.
In the old days, we would have simply pushed the throttles less in the direction of the full thrust point – basically.
Again, I've only explained the temperature component, as you asked for a simple explaination of the matter. Also, there are times when you can not use "Flex" and must use "Full-Thrust".
That’s as simple as it gets. Sorry!
Last edited by captain_jeeves; 29th Aug 2006 at 04:56. Reason: Spelling
The Bumblebee
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Inside the shiny tube.
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are a few factors that can effect the Flex temperature. If the calculated Flex is 67 degrees from performance chart using your TOW, we take in factors if the runway conditions are wet (usually reduces the flex temperature), also the QNH plays a part if QNH is anything but 1013 it changes the flex temprature as well. So the end result may not be 67 but it could be lower (if wet and low QNH).
Now there are certain limitations when you can or cannot flex. I'll be more than happy to type it out for you if you need them.
Now there are certain limitations when you can or cannot flex. I'll be more than happy to type it out for you if you need them.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: the dark side of the moon!
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Flex" - thoughts and thanx!
Excellent replies thank's all - feel free to add further!
Would I therefore be corrct in saying a lower flex temp = higher thrust output and vice versa?
Thank's again, the pieces are starting to fall into place!
Eng
Would I therefore be corrct in saying a lower flex temp = higher thrust output and vice versa?
Thank's again, the pieces are starting to fall into place!
Eng
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth
Age: 61
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If it helps, all things equal and standard (QRH, OAT, Etc) if you "hypothetically" set flex to your rated temp, you would in fact have full-thrust. Again, this is just a generalization.
Guys, remember, this question asked for a general overview. Let's not get too carried away with the FCOM and Performance Chart specifics.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: the dark side of the moon!
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank's again Captain Jeeves, starting to get to grips with the theory now. I've heard the term on many occasions but it's not a function we as engineers deal with alot, engine running for us requires us to manually make the appropriate power settings.
At the moment I'm keen to "get to grips" with the Airbus as there's an awful lot of different theories/practices compared to those I'm used to on the 737 Classic's.
Loads to learn!!
Thank's again for your help,
Eng
At the moment I'm keen to "get to grips" with the Airbus as there's an awful lot of different theories/practices compared to those I'm used to on the 737 Classic's.
Loads to learn!!
Thank's again for your help,
Eng