Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Piper Seneca Stall Warning

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Piper Seneca Stall Warning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Apr 2007, 20:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: essex uk
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Snoop Piper Seneca Stall Warning

Why does the Seneca have two stall warning sensors on the leading edge of the same wing, and why does one of the sensors become inop when you select 25 or 40 flap.
Thanks
brooker100 is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2007, 21:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And why are the Piper Seminole stall warners disconnected on the ground so that you can't test em?
Think lowering the later stages of flap on the Seneca alters the relative airflow making the one stall warner useless. Look carefully at the stall warner vane, they are positioned at slightly different angles.
Probably suggests why the Seneca seems to stall at full flap on landing, crashing down weakening the nose drag link on the nose leg that seems to fail a lot.

Last edited by BigEndBob; 21st Apr 2007 at 21:11.
BigEndBob is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2007, 20:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you select flap on the Seneca (or indeed almost any A/c), you alter the characteristics of the wing (chord, relative AoA etc), and hence the stall characteristics. Therefore you have a stall warner designed purely for selection of flap, and the different characteristics this produces, and because of the different relative AoA the warner is positioned on a slightly different section of the leading edge.
Maude Charlee is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2007, 11:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Location Location
Age: 48
Posts: 62
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Landing the mighty Seneca...

Whilst we're on the subject, does anyone have any tips on how to produce anything other than a controlled crash onto the threshold from this delightful machine??

r2
r2_unit is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2007, 12:56
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nope, but if you ever end up flying the Dash 8 Q400, it is perfect preparation!
Maude Charlee is offline  
Old 21st Apr 2007, 21:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just try landing with 2nd flap only.
BigEndBob is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2007, 11:00
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,183
Received 93 Likes on 62 Posts
.. or, like with any aircraft .. make it do what you require ... I don't have much time on the Sneak but can't recall any real difficulty with landing .. maybe that is just a reflection on my "close eyes at 50ft" technique ..
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2007, 11:21
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: the pub
Age: 57
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whilst we're on the subject, does anyone have any tips on how to produce anything other than a controlled crash onto the threshold from this delightful machine??
I never thought I had any real problems with landing until I flew this heap (Seneca 3) for a couple of hundred hrs.

My best arrivals were,as Big End Bob says, with just 2nd flap selected.
one dot right is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2007, 17:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dry bar
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A tiny fraction of power just prior to touch down could sometimes soften the blow. The seneca is a real handful once she starts to porpoise I seem to remember.

Think the stall warning vanes are isolated by squat switches on the ground I think?
shaun ryder is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2007, 18:08
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BigEndBob;

Are they heated vanes? If so they would not be powered on the ground.
I don't see any point in frequently testing them on the ground other than to verify that the wiring is intact and the horn is functional (usually the same horn is used for the gear warning). The maintenance dept. likely does that type of check during the annual inspection (with the aircraft on jacks). They are not very accurate devices. Testing via an actual stall would be a better indication of correct function.

Last edited by Tree; 22nd Apr 2007 at 19:48.
Tree is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2007, 18:07
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Location Location
Age: 48
Posts: 62
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
shaun_ryder - thanks for that, just the trick.

john_tullamarine - a truely incisive one-liner...
r2_unit is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2007, 20:18
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Grand Com f'Ort
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't use power - it nadgers your performance.

DO close the throttles at about 20ft, put both hands on the control column, and concentrate on an accurate flare, which may take a moment or two.

No problem...
Kit d'Rection KG is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2007, 20:58
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dry bar
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct, but if you are not performance limited, whats the harm?
shaun ryder is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.