P8 - Poseidon vs Nimrod
 

The RAF is to acquire these B737 based craft to replace Nimrod.

Reading the Tech pages, it is clear that tankering fuel is not an efficient way to fly long distances (hence the demise of the Singapore-JFK non-stop route with an A340-500).

The Nimrod was able to shut down two engines and hang around for a long period monitoring whatever it needed to monitor. Can't shut down two engines on a P8.... and in any event, aren't these planes designed to operate most efficiently at about 0.8M. Presumably Nimrod flew at a much lower speed to 'hang around'.

So is this an intelligent choice, Hobson's choice or what?

Assuming the same sensor fit, it would be. However, the P-8 sensor suite is optimized to allow the mission to be done at higher altitudes and speeds. A direct comparison considering just altitude / speed / loiter time isn't really valid, you have to look at overall mission effectiveness.

TWB

Espada 111
SQ Flight to JFK is returning I was told on my last SQ flight 2 weeks ago. It was cut due to world wide downturn / recession. I did fly on it once, it was all Business Class configuration, but it was an awfully long way. Re Nimrod v 737 think this also maybe economics as you elude to.


Regards
Mr Mac

Nimrod hands down then.