747-8 chosen to replace air force 1
Reuters are reporting the decision to replace AF1 with 747-8
Air Force picks Boeing 747-8 to replace Air Force One: sources |
Would you expect them to choose a magnificent Airbus?
|
Can't beat 4 engines ! :ok:
Good to see Obama maintaining some sort of standards in his shift. |
747-8 chosen to replace air force 1
I thought the -8 was a donkey ? Mind you, won't be run of the mill will it. I know QR have bought 3 BBJ versions too, some private toy THAT will be
|
Bloomberg: "The first new Air Force One isn’t expected to be delivered until 2018, when it will be tested before entering service in fiscal 2023."
5 years of testing? Seems a little excessive considering it only has a planned 30 year lifespan. |
I think there was a requirement, that AF-1 planes should be physically assembled on US soil. That was one of reasons why Airbus did not participate with its A380 in bidding.
|
I believe the extensive testing is because of the sophisticated electronic gear onboard.
|
Bloomberg: "The first new Air Force One isn’t expected to be delivered until 2018, when it will be tested before entering service in fiscal 2023." 5 years of testing? Seems a little excessive considering it only has a planned 30 year lifespan. |
I was thinking there probably won't be any 4 engined passenger aircraft in production in 2023 alright....
|
"Airforce1, descending to FL 270 due to icing"
That plane is a joke, a disgrace to modern air travel - and the president of the US of A is going to ride in one. He probably rides in a Cadillac instead of a BMW, too. To quote Top Gear: "In Europe the meassurements in autoconstruction are rounded to the nearest millimeter, in the US it's the nearest - foot!" Good Luck, Mr. President... |
Do you think if he asked nicely they would give Dave one of the old ones! We must be one of the only country's in the world that hasn't got a decent first jet.
|
I know I am too lazy but...
What do the Greeks, Italian & Spanish "topC" politicians get to fly on?
|
What a waste of U.S. taxpayer money.
With the present clown-in-chief it spews huge amounts of carbon to take him from Andrews AFB to PHNL on a regular basis. But, none of them, past, present or future, are royalty. |
Originally posted by Admiral346: To quote Top Gear: "In Europe the meassurements in autoconstruction are rounded to the nearest millimeter, in the US it's the nearest - foot!" |
And what makes it OK for royalty to spew huge amounts of carbon ???
|
Originally Posted by Admiral346
That plane is a joke, a disgrace to modern air travel
I believe I also read that Cargolux find they are more efficient than promised, even without the engine performance enhancement package. The icing issue you refer to was an engine issue :ugh::rolleyes: |
Amusing to see Flight report that the 747-8 "bested the A380," even though it wasn't offered.
By that metric, the 747-8 also 'bested' the Spruce Goose, H.P.42, Cri-Cri and X-37B. :E I/C |
The US government would have gone for a Triple 7 in preference to the A380. In fact, the French could have 'bidded' till they were blue in the face, they would have had as much chance as a snowball in hell!:ugh:
|
5 years of testing? Seems a little excessive considering it only has a planned 30 year lifespan. 3 years is consistent with the current 747 Air Force One aircraft - IIRC the first one rolled out in 1986, after normal production flight testing it, was flown to Wichita were it was modified into the VC-25A configuration (executive interior, tons of communication and avionics changes, dual APU installation, Aerial Refueling, etc). Delivered to the USAF late 1989. Second airplane followed a year later. Presumably the new 747-8 AF1 will be a similar deal - it'll roll out as a pretty much typical 747-8i but without an interior - and they'll fly it to a mod center somewhere for all the upgrades. It probably won't be Wichita though - Boeing Wichita no longer exists :rolleyes: |
Could still be Wichita... Spirit, which Boeing spun off several years ago, is still in business, likely with many of the same ex-Boeing workers.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:26. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.