PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) (https://www.pprune.org/spectators-balcony-spotters-corner-52/)
-   -   Delta DL 29 (https://www.pprune.org/spectators-balcony-spotters-corner/547511-delta-dl-29-a.html)

itspaul 13th Sep 2014 16:59

Delta DL 29
 
On flight radar. Delta dl29 squawking 7700 looks like heading heathrow ?

Ian W 13th Sep 2014 17:09


Originally Posted by itspaul (Post 8654584)
On flight radar. Delta dl29 squawking 7700 looks like heading heathrow ?

Landed Heathrow - got the stacks quite full so 29 had priority. The landing stream just getting back underway now.

Nozzer 13th Sep 2014 17:13

He got almost half way across the pond apparently before turning back.

Ian W 13th Sep 2014 17:24

The track I saw looked like the aircraft turned back at around 49N009W. Obviously got a lot of priority with traffic being backed up into the stacks.

Hotel Tango 13th Sep 2014 17:27

:zzz::zzz::zzz: This is for the Spotters Forum!

DaveReidUK 13th Sep 2014 19:46


This is for the Spotters Forum!
And that's being charitable. :O

eastern wiseguy 13th Sep 2014 20:51

9 west.....is hardly "halfway across the pond" .....To Spectators Balcony with this .

HEATHROW DIRECTOR 13th Sep 2014 20:55

IanW Any priority traffic is threaded under the holding areas and fitted in with the normal sequence, perhaps with a little more room ahead of an behind, depending on what the problem is. The holding stacks don't simply pile up and wait - normality continues until the priority aircraft is closer in.

FERetd 13th Sep 2014 21:09

Forum Police
 
To those members of the Forum Police,

Was this item not news?

This is the Rumours and News forum!

manrow 13th Sep 2014 21:14

So where is the information on why the aircraft turned back?

AviatorTB 13th Sep 2014 21:33

FERetd
 
Clearly it was a slow day on 121.5 so the guard police sent a a contingent here to augment their skill set.

DaveReidUK 13th Sep 2014 21:57


Was this item not news?

This is the Rumours and News forum!
It's no more news than the many other daily instances of aircraft diversions.

I suspect that even the denizens of the Spotters Forum would get rapidly fed up if every one of those was similarly reported.

Capn Bloggs 13th Sep 2014 23:58


Originally Posted by Davereid
It's no more news than the many other daily instances of aircraft diversions.

You have many daily Maydays over there, so you?

Ian W 14th Sep 2014 00:34


Originally Posted by DaveReidUK (Post 8654942)
It's no more news than the many other daily instances of aircraft diversions.

I suspect that even the denizens of the Spotters Forum would get rapidly fed up if every one of those was similarly reported.

Considering the extreme reluctance of pilots of scheduled carriers to declare emergencies, squawking 7700 and diverting to Heathrow is more than a weather/fuel diversion and indicates a level of concern that is far from normal. A valid thing to put into this section of the forum.

GAPSTER 14th Sep 2014 06:31

Nice to see the professionals are right on it

HEATHROW DIRECTOR 14th Sep 2014 06:57

Ian W Having read your profile I cannot believe that you could write such things.

Capn Bloggs 14th Sep 2014 07:17

HH is right. Squawking 7700, akin to declaring a Mayday, is the best way to get priority and not be messed around when you want to return for whatever reason. :cool:

DaveReidUK 14th Sep 2014 08:00


Originally Posted by Capn Bloggs (Post 8655096)
You have many daily Maydays over there, so you?

I don't recall constraining my comment to "over there" (wherever that is). If every 7700 squawk worldwide produced a post on PPRuNe's R&N, they would outnumber all the other threads put together. I'm sure that's not what you would want.


Originally Posted by Ian W (Post 8655120)
A valid thing to put into this section of the forum.

Looks like the mods share my view that stuff like this didn't belong there (R&N).

FERetd 14th Sep 2014 08:36

Moderators?
 
You call them moderators (good to keep on the right side, I suppose). I'd call them censors. What you see, is what they want you to see!

The item was no more or less newsworthy than half the posts on Rumours and News.

Perhaps we need an "Approved by DavidReidUK" endorsement.

DaveReidUK 14th Sep 2014 09:15


Originally Posted by FERetd (Post 8655393)
Perhaps we need an "Approved by DavidReidUK" endorsement.

By all means feel free to disagree with my views and opinions, but let's leave the ad hominem stuff out, shall we?


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:49.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.