PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) (https://www.pprune.org/spectators-balcony-spotters-corner-52/)
-   -   Vantage point for this pic? (https://www.pprune.org/spectators-balcony-spotters-corner/545631-vantage-point-pic.html)

Flying Serpent 14th Aug 2014 19:09

Vantage point for this pic?
 
In a helicopter hovering above the approach path? Not likely I'd assume...so any other options?

Photos: Boeing 777-236/ER Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net

DaveReidUK 14th Aug 2014 21:02

I'd say from a helicopter hovering above the approach path. :O

Hotel Tango 14th Aug 2014 21:16

You will also find numerous similar pictures taken at LAX and the odd other airport in the U.S. They are generally taken from light aircraft following published VFR routes.

Flying Serpent 14th Aug 2014 21:42

Thanks for the replies. Will look out for the LAX pics at some point.

SpringHeeledJack 15th Aug 2014 06:32

There was, perhaps still is a photographer Sam Chui who specialised in this type of photography in and around LAX and managed to get some really impressive shots of landing/departing aircraft. Hopefully he wasn't flying at the same time ;)

irishair2001 15th Aug 2014 22:04

Sam Chui,
Has recently done a similar photo shoot at Heathrow and some of the pics are incredible,the one of the B A 747 shortly after take off is amazing.

Wirbelsturm 15th Aug 2014 22:41

Helo route 9 runs straight over the top of Heathrow from Sipson to Bedfont through a point between 27L and 27R thresholds. I remember well sitting in the hold position overhead Concorde as she departed 27L, would of made a fantastic photo if I hadn't had my hands full. :E

jackieofalltrades 16th Aug 2014 02:36

Whatever it was taken from, I think it's a great photo.

Airbanda 16th Aug 2014 09:43

The background (housing etc) appears foreshortened suggesting a telephoto shot from an a//c above but at a safe separation.

Hotel Tango 16th Aug 2014 13:48

I don't think anyone was questioning the seperation. Of course it was safe otherwise it just wouldn't have taken place.

Capot 16th Aug 2014 14:57

I guess that the photographer is a lot further above the aircraft than it seems; ie it's a tele shot with much cropping. I agree with Airbanda.

Otherwise a sudden go-round, very shortly before the shot was taken, might have been exciting.

glad rag 16th Aug 2014 16:45

That image is rather impressive I must say..

NWSRG 16th Aug 2014 18:01


Sam Chui,
Has recently done a similar photo shoot at Heathrow and some of the pics are incredible,the one of the B A 747 shortly after take off is amazing.
Yep...stunning. Probably the best image I've seen in a very long time.

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Briti...301141dfb2e2b7

boeing_eng 18th Aug 2014 00:46

Sam Chui has been roaming the world pursuing even more extravagant photo shoots for years...very impressive stuff a lot of it as he's clearly using some top notch gear (I'm told he's bankrolled by his parents!):D

Dont Hang Up 27th Aug 2014 11:16

Notice that the shadow of the aircraft on the ground behind it is pretty much the same size as the aircraft. This shows us that the camera was a very long way from the aircraft using a very powerful telephoto lens. Indeed the camera aircraft may have been well beyond the far end of the the landing runway.

Non of which detracts from the fact that it is a great picture.

I am trying to track down another picture on the web which shows a departing 747 in what looks like a near-vertical take-off from LAX. Again it is extreme telephoto foreshortening which fools us - not just with distance, but the angles as well.

DaveReidUK 27th Aug 2014 16:17

The size of the aircraft's shadow on the ground will be identical to its actual span and length, but the apparent size in the photo is about 90%, so the camera must be at approximately ten times the altitude of the aircraft.

The neighbourhood the aircraft is overflying is just under a mile from the threshold, so that would put the camera at around 3000', if my maths is correct.

Dont Hang Up 27th Aug 2014 18:43

Ten times the apparent distance (at least). It will not be necessarily at very high altitude at all. that is the deceptive thing about the apparent angles in long telephoto shots. In the link below the camera aircraft is a considerable distance away but on a transit route below the take-off path of the 747.

Photos: Boeing 747-446 Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net

DaveReidUK 27th Aug 2014 19:46


The neighbourhood the aircraft is overflying is just under a mile from the threshold, so that would put the camera at around 3000', if my maths is correct.
Furthermore, assuming that:

a) the aspect ratio of the photo isn't distorted

and

b) the aircraft's attitude is more-or-less level (it's a mile out on finals, so that's a reasonable assumption)

It's possible to deduce that the camera must be pointing approximately 20° below the horizontal.

Therefore, given that the camera is around 2700' above the aircraft, the horizontal offset distance must be around 7500' (1.25nm) i.e. the camera position is roughly abeam the midpoint of the runway.

Duchess_Driver 27th Aug 2014 21:43

As has been said, there is a VFR transit route right over the top of Lindbergh Field. Don't have my San Diego TAC at hand (it's out of date anyway!) but If I recall correctly over the top between 3300 and 4500 - no issues. Lower if the controller is happy you know your stuff.

Great place to fly.

DaveReidUK 27th Aug 2014 22:35


If I recall correctly over the top between 3300 and 4500 - no issues. Lower if the controller is happy you know your stuff.
Thanks, sounds like my calculations might not be too far off !


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:44.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.