PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) (https://www.pprune.org/spectators-balcony-spotters-corner-52/)
-   -   7E7 now known as the B787 (https://www.pprune.org/spectators-balcony-spotters-corner/161167-7e7-now-known-b787.html)

Jetavia 28th Jan 2005 19:49

7E7 now known as the B787
 
See http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/...r_050128g.html

BEagle 28th Jan 2005 20:01

"....in many Asian cultures the number 8 represents good luck and prosperity..."

As in Airbus A380?

Can't help thinking that, whereas "Seven ee seven" has some appeal for its novelty, "Seven Eight Seven" doesn't.

Are they just trying too hard at Boeing?

Jetavia 28th Jan 2005 20:32

The 8īs in the 380 and 787 are both influenced by the "....in many Asian cultures the number 8 represents good luck and prosperity..." itīs a big upcoming market so why not try to make the asians happy.

When you think of it, boeing only had the 8 and 9 to choose from, since the last newly designed aircraft was the 777 the 787 designation would be the obvious choice.

lead zeppelin 28th Jan 2005 21:39

Well, only one more new type and then what? Start in the 800's with the Boeing 808? That'll get more Asian sales!

SecurID 29th Jan 2005 00:58

The B888 will do really well then! Although the accolade for that model designator has already been taken by Ducati!

Aaaahhh, sheer beauty!

http://www.ducati.net/arch/sp4/sp4.jpg

West Coast 29th Jan 2005 05:28

"Are they just trying too hard at Boeing"

Are you spending too much time at the computer?

Buster Hyman 29th Jan 2005 06:19


the Boeing 808
I assume that Mazda won't mind!;)

Flightluuvr 29th Jan 2005 06:30

7E7 had a nice ring to it. 787 sounds like :yuk: and its one of the smallest planes they make so giving it the highest number just seems wrong IMO.

and it reminds me of that joke "why was 6 so afraid? because 7 ate 9." :yuk:

brakedwell 29th Jan 2005 06:42

Seven Eighty Seven is easier to say than Seven Seventy Seven!

surely not 29th Jan 2005 11:03

Perhaps Boeing are going to patent the number 8 next to scupper the opposition!! :yuk:

Thunderball 2 29th Jan 2005 11:26

"Since the naming of the initial 707, all Boeing commercial jets have been named in succession based on the 7-7 formula: 717, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767 and 777 up to the latest Boeing commercial jet transport, the 787".
Boeing Press Release, 28th January 2005


The 720 fitted really neatly into that formula, didn't it?

Nothing like re-writing history to make everything seem logical and well thought-through. ;)

BEagle 29th Jan 2005 11:30

No, Westy. I just think that the press release from Boeing lacked much substance. Marketing luvvy speak in the main.

As their 7E7 plastic plane was supposed to be something new and revolutionary (and well it might be), the name merited a new-style ring to it.

Whereas 787 just sounds like something rather run of the mill. Like 717 - what a daft idea that was. Everyone still thinks it's a DC9. In any case, it was a recycled designation because the KC-135 was originally termed the 717. Which is ironic because the current 717 is just a recycled DC9. Which was later known as the MD80 after the 'DC' designation became unmarketable following the various disasters which befell the DC-10.

Can't see many people talking about 'Dreamliners'. But Sonicruisers or even 7E7s - certainly.

JEP 29th Jan 2005 12:52

So how will they name the aircraft after B 797 ??

one ball 29th Jan 2005 13:59

"how will they name the aircraft after B 797"

You really think civilisation as we know it will last long enough for you to worry about that??????? :confused:

It's all going downhill starting with Iraq, then Iran............... nukes......

LateLandingClearance 29th Jan 2005 16:12


So how will they name the aircraft after B 797 ??
Ahh, the mythical beast lurking in the back of every Boeing designer's brain.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you the 7-10-7 :\

coopervane 29th Jan 2005 21:01

The Convair 880 din't bring much prosperity to them!

In reply to what may come after the 797? Well obviously the 7107!!!!

Coop and 8 ball Bear

Flightluuvr 31st Jan 2005 09:17

Thunderball,

actually the 717 does not fit the sequence since it became a boeing after the 777 was already out.

keel beam 31st Jan 2005 10:54


In reply to what may come after the 797? Well obviously the 7107!!!!
It is more likely to be the 1707. After all their supersonic study was the 2707.

Now that begs the question - as the plane no. designation rises will the speed?

pprecious 31st Jan 2005 11:34

Hexadecimal Numbering
 
The Boeing 7A7 perhaps, bearing mind that the term 7E7 has already been used.

That should free up another 5 designations...

I'll get me coat.....

ElectroVlasic 31st Jan 2005 14:15

Ah, another "numerology" thread. I'm always bemused at the joy or the consternation people get out of numbers.

As for trademarking numbers, that's not allowed in the US at least and maybe elsewhere too. Intel tried to trademark 586, after it was mad at AMD for selling a 486 part, but it was not allowed. Thus Intel gave a bazillion dollars to some branding consultant who came up with "Pentium". It seems to me that this was the point where the whole mania for branding really took off.


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:04.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.