Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Atmosphere Intercontinental Airlines Uk - What?!

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Atmosphere Intercontinental Airlines Uk - What?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jan 2020, 18:12
  #841 (permalink)  
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Global Nomad
Age: 55
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Three of our heroes Twitter accounts have been restricted for some reason
Someone must have reported them . He's got more up and running already though I would bet. @jetairways2020 and @jetairwaysconsm both have the whiff of advanced Jasonic idiocy about them....

TA
TwinAisle is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2020, 20:50
  #842 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Wolverhampton
Posts: 407
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TwinAisle
Someone must have reported them . He's got more up and running already though I would bet. @jetairways2020 and @jetairwaysconsm both have the whiff of advanced Jasonic idiocy about them....

TA
JetairwaysCONsm (my caps) says it all.
​​​
Flying Hi is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2020, 21:29
  #843 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: The Midlands
Age: 39
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TwinAisle
Someone must have reported them . He's got more up and running already though I would bet. @jetairways2020 and @jetairwaysconsm both have the whiff of advanced Jasonic idiocy about them....

TA
Considering I'm off at the moment with a stonking bout of manflu, reading through those tweets has cheered me up no end!!

I couldn't help myself but to have a bit of a dig.


diffident is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2020, 17:03
  #844 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: where the aircraft takes me
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Delusion continues...
​​​​​​https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jason-unsworth-3bb51a67_9w-activity-6630859858247761920-tk68
Sad that some people still believe in his tales!
whisky777 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2020, 17:10
  #845 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Cheltenham, UK
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
His company now has a CCJ against it, be interesting to know what that was for....

I’ve also added my input to his LinkedIn post. Wait for the block!




I
BirdmanBerry is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2020, 07:23
  #846 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: The Midlands
Age: 39
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BirdmanBerry
His company now has a CCJ against it, be interesting to know what that was for....

I’ve also added my input to his LinkedIn post. Wait for the block!




I
I am already blocked on all platforms now, so sadly I can't see, nor add to your comment.

The information you have provided however is by far the last knockings of this saga. Absolutely no chance (not that there was any in any case) of gaining financing in any way, shape or form with a CCJ against the business, simply not happening, nada, never.

It will be interesting to determine whether Unsworth showed up to the issuing court, or whether Mrs G Unsworth, who is still listed a director, is aware that she is party to a CCJ???

The other point you make is quite key too... a registered company, that is dormant and doing no business - how on earth has it ended up in a position to be CCJ'd for the princely sum (in real terms) of £500??? It will have cost the creditor more to get the CCJ than it would to just write it off, so someone somewhere is very very miffed with our entrepreneur!
diffident is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2020, 07:42
  #847 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 191
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by diffident
It will have cost the creditor more to get the CCJ than it would to just write it off, so someone somewhere is very very miffed with our entrepreneur!
Last I checked you could use HMG's MoneyClaim Online for about £35 to bring a case before the Small Claims Court, and you add this fee onto your claim, plus interest and expenses. I've used it a few times myself, no solicitors involved 👍
Stu666 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2020, 19:17
  #848 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Siargao Island
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by diffident
I am already blocked on all platforms now, so sadly I can't see, nor add to your comment.

The information you have provided however is by far the last knockings of this saga. Absolutely no chance (not that there was any in any case) of gaining financing in any way, shape or form with a CCJ against the business, simply not happening, nada, never.

It will be interesting to determine whether Unsworth showed up to the issuing court, or whether Mrs G Unsworth, who is still listed a director, is aware that she is party to a CCJ???

The other point you make is quite key too... a registered company, that is dormant and doing no business - how on earth has it ended up in a position to be CCJ'd for the princely sum (in real terms) of £500??? It will have cost the creditor more to get the CCJ than it would to just write it off, so someone somewhere is very very miffed with our entrepreneur!
I've got a England & Wales CCJ against me, I acquired it because my ex bank were addressing letters to a wrong address, that I never received, then they took court action against me, to the wrong address also, I mean I knew nothing about this until years later when I came to sell a property that I owned to learn that it had a marker against it.

The courts can be farcicle, the debt collector goes to court, feeds them full of bull, and a CCJ gets issued, from what I've read in the past this JU has been using a variety of addresses, it could be as simple that, like me, a debt collector has been writing to the wrong address and as a result a CCJ is issued.

But the CCJ doesn't affect me doing business except in England & Wales or perhaps the entire UK so it's not something that I need to worry about.
Harry Wayfarers is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2020, 19:25
  #849 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: The Midlands
Age: 39
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Harry Wayfarers
I've got a England & Wales CCJ against me, I acquired it because my ex bank were addressing letters to a wrong address, that I never received, then they took court action against me, to the wrong address also, I mean I knew nothing about this until years later when I came to sell a property that I owned to learn that it had a marker against it.

The courts can be farcicle, the debt collector goes to court, feeds them full of bull, and a CCJ gets issued, from what I've read in the past this JU has been using a variety of addresses, it could be as simple that, like me, a debt collector has been writing to the wrong address and as a result a CCJ is issued.

But the CCJ doesn't affect me doing business except in England & Wales or perhaps the entire UK so it's not something that I need to worry about.
Oh absolutely Harry Wayfarers, personal CCJ's are an area of civil law in England & Wales that certainly needs addressing.

This on the other hand is a corporate CCJ, which is in itself a slightly different kettle of fish. The point I'm getting at here - seeing that the amount is so small - it is one thing to blurt rubbish all over social media and through the odd blog and fantasy website... it's another thing (in fact it is quite simply fraud) to start entering into business contracts and/or take money on the proviso of something happening (otherwise known as deception).

It's a whole different thing for JU in this position. It is actually real, and actually serious that a business he registered at companies house to give himself the sense of legitimacy for his fantasy idea, has now gained real-world debt. Regardless of it being only £500, someone somewhere is currently £500 out of pocket on a lie.

That, frankly, is where this goes from something humorous and entertaining to poke a bit of fun at, to being really rather concerning.
diffident is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2020, 19:38
  #850 (permalink)  
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Global Nomad
Age: 55
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
someone somewhere is currently £500 out of pocket on a lie
Wonder if this is his late filing fees with Companies House, that no doubt he has declined to pay?

Wonder how much else he has on the creditor's side that hasn't attracted a CCJ (yet)? Does he owe Intelisys I wonder, I've never known a CRS supplier that didn't demand a cheque on contract signature - and that would be sharply more than £500....

Harry, I think he would be very hard pushed to argue that they have his address wrong; he's always used Grandpa's place in Essex or the place in Romford.

TA
TwinAisle is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2020, 19:49
  #851 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: The Midlands
Age: 39
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TwinAisle
Wonder if this is his late filing fees with Companies House, that no doubt he has declined to pay?
I wouldn't have thought so, Companies House like to go after the directors personally, so I would have expected any action by CH to be against him personally as the person listed with "significant control". Indeed, CH make a big thing about director's personal responsibility in areas such as filing.

The point I made previously though - as he and, I assume, his grandmother(?) are listed as directors - is she aware of the CCJ against the company and the possible ramifications of it? I'd be inclined to suggest most likely not.

But again, coming back to the subject in hand, for a registered company that has no assets or cash on hand, and to now be 4 times its issued share capital in debt, really does speak volumes of this whole sorry saga. The concern as I stated before, is that its gone from pretty harmless social media/online fantasy, to now being something rather more serious, particularly from the point of view that someone somewhere is owed money and was likely deceived into parting with a service/product in the first place.
diffident is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2020, 19:52
  #852 (permalink)  
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Global Nomad
Age: 55
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Companies House like to go after the directors personally
Good point, I'd forgotten that.

The concern as I stated before, is that its gone from pretty harmless social media/online fantasy, to now being something rather more serious
I'd suggest it's been getting horridly serious for a while. As I said, he's probably cost a lot of people a lot of money, starting some years back; and my heart goes out to those poor ex-Jet employees he fed crap to and gave them false hope.

TA
TwinAisle is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2020, 00:30
  #853 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Siargao Island
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by diffident
Oh absolutely Harry Wayfarers, personal CCJ's are an area of civil law in England & Wales that certainly needs addressing.

This on the other hand is a corporate CCJ, which is in itself a slightly different kettle of fish. The point I'm getting at here - seeing that the amount is so small - it is one thing to blurt rubbish all over social media and through the odd blog and fantasy website... it's another thing (in fact it is quite simply fraud) to start entering into business contracts and/or take money on the proviso of something happening (otherwise known as deception).

It's a whole different thing for JU in this position. It is actually real, and actually serious that a business he registered at companies house to give himself the sense of legitimacy for his fantasy idea, has now gained real-world debt. Regardless of it being only £500, someone somewhere is currently £500 out of pocket on a lie.

That, frankly, is where this goes from something humorous and entertaining to poke a bit of fun at, to being really rather concerning.
The Money Claim Online (MCOL) has been mentioned, I've used it a few times and it was probably down to me that they introduced a rule that it can't be used against a government department, MCOL is Northamptonshire County Court, I used it to sue Northamptonshire Police (whose HQ is in the same building as the court) for trashing 2 of my computers during a corrupt investigation against me, the police didn't defend and I won, but at the time I had a dormant business registered in England & Wales whilst I also had an offshore business of exactly the same name that was trading..

The police claimed to have done a search on my company and I was the 100% shareholder, "it's dormant you idiots" I replied, that my trading business was offshore and they couldn't search that whilst, if I recall correctly, nobody could make a claim against or take my dormant business to court because it wasn't trading having registered it just to reserve the business identity.

So if JU's business is dormant, not trading, then why on god's earth would people be in a position to make monetary claims against it and would the CC that issued the J even be aware that it was doirmant?
Harry Wayfarers is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2020, 07:13
  #854 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: The Midlands
Age: 39
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Harry Wayfarers
So if JU's business is dormant, not trading, then why on god's earth would people be in a position to make monetary claims against it and would the CC that issued the J even be aware that it was doirmant?
A business is only dormant on the declaration of its directors in an annual (or extra-ordinary) return to CH.

It legally automatically ceases to be dormant once it conducts business, regardless of its declarations to CH. It would be expected that in the next company return, the business that has been transacted in the period would be recorded be it expenditure or income and profit or loss.

If I was to take a claim against JU, it would be very easy to prove that the company isn't dormant, by simply producing social media posts of letters claiming to be "Expressions of Interest" sent to the liquidators of Jet Airways and the many other claims that have been made. We all know they are fantasy, but they would be enough to prove a dormant company isn't dormant - but in fact, actively trading.
diffident is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2020, 08:24
  #855 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Siargao Island
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by diffident
A business is only dormant on the declaration of its directors in an annual (or extra-ordinary) return to CH.

It legally automatically ceases to be dormant once it conducts business, regardless of its declarations to CH. It would be expected that in the next company return, the business that has been transacted in the period would be recorded be it expenditure or income and profit or loss.

If I was to take a claim against JU, it would be very easy to prove that the company isn't dormant, by simply producing social media posts of letters claiming to be "Expressions of Interest" sent to the liquidators of Jet Airways and the many other claims that have been made. We all know they are fantasy, but they would be enough to prove a dormant company isn't dormant - but in fact, actively trading.
Is it known that JU isn't conducting business as I was, under the same trading name but from other than UK.

I note that this thread is titled with a company name ending in 'UK', my offshore company was trading from Belize and ended in 'Limited' but I could have called it 'UK' or whatever I wanted to, despite it stating on my then company website that it was registered in England & Wales and Belize if I managed to confuse the UK police as to which company was trading ... OK, the police weren't so clever but I get the impression that JU isn't so clever either!
Harry Wayfarers is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2020, 12:46
  #856 (permalink)  
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Global Nomad
Age: 55
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think he’d find it hard to argue his company is dormant - read back on here and he has been loosing off all sorts of letters, EoI, MoU, you name it, all in the name of the business.

He does, despite the myriad variations of Atmosphere Intercontinental xxxx (replace xxxx with the name of almost any country or airline function you can think of) seem to have only one corporate entity, the UK one (‘registered as an airline with Companies House and Downing Street’. I kid you not).

TA
TwinAisle is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2020, 13:12
  #857 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by TwinAisle
I think he’d find it hard to argue his company is dormant - read back on here and he has been loosing off all sorts of letters, EoI, MoU, you name it, all in the name of the business.
The essential test of whether a company is dormant is whether it is receiving any income.

I've not seen any reference anywhere to Atmosphere earning revenue from any customers, in fact the very idea is laughable.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2020, 13:20
  #858 (permalink)  
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Global Nomad
Age: 55
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not according to Companies House: any sort of ‘business activity’ or ‘generating revenue’ makes a company active.

TA
TwinAisle is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2020, 13:44
  #859 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
I suppose it depends on how they define "business activity", and whether just writing letters and posting on Twitter counts.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2020, 16:59
  #860 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Siargao Island
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
The essential test of whether a company is dormant is whether it is receiving any income.

I've not seen any reference anywhere to Atmosphere earning revenue from any customers, in fact the very idea is laughable.
A business owner could chat away on social media trying to drum up bisiness for his company, he could be chatting with guys down the pub, he could be standing on the street with sandwich boards, but until such time as that company generates some business I'd suggest that it remains as declared dormant.
Harry Wayfarers is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.