Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Atmosphere Intercontinental Airlines Uk - What?!

Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Atmosphere Intercontinental Airlines Uk - What?!

Old 22nd May 2019, 19:29
  #501 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Coasting South
Age: 65
Posts: 62
Yes, J Icarus U's feathers ruffled, nice work Kevin, although I'll miss this saga if when it ends.
hiflymk3 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2019, 19:58
  #502 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 30
Originally Posted by hiflymk3 View Post
Yes, J Icarus U's feathers ruffled, nice work Kevin, although I'll miss this saga if when it ends.
Melting nicely
Auxtank is offline  
Old 22nd May 2019, 21:51
  #503 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockport MAN/EGCC
Age: 66
Posts: 907
Originally Posted by diffident View Post
Well, I've completed my research. Hopefully this will bring matters to a close.
Quality work, should really be passed to the BBC for one of their ‘Rip Off’ programs.
Be lucky
David
The AvgasDinosaur is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 07:59
  #504 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Just north of Chester, UK.
Posts: 271
Originally Posted by diffident View Post


Oh dear, ruffled some feathers it seems.
Careful, he might send @atmospherelegal after you!
Captivep is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 08:21
  #505 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: The Midlands
Age: 35
Posts: 178
Originally Posted by Captivep View Post
Careful, he might send @atmospherelegal after you!
That would be the ideal outcome. I would suggest that in the real world, my letter and article would have ushered a "Cease and Desist" notice and threat of an injunction by now if what I have been writing are "smears"!!

I'm still waiting for that promised "emailed response" too. I'm not holding out much in the way of hope nor am I losing any sleep over it!
diffident is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 08:28
  #506 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wolverhampton
Posts: 2
Originally Posted by diffident View Post
That would be the ideal outcome. I would suggest that in the real world, my letter and article would have ushered a "Cease and Desist" notice and threat of an injunction by now if what I have been writing are "smears"!!

I'm still waiting for that promised "emailed response" too. I'm not holding out much in the way of hope nor am I losing any sleep over it!
I guess Unworthy and his NPD are too busy trying to buy the TCX aircraft with his JSA.
sixchannel is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 08:58
  #507 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: cyprus
Posts: 18
Yep Primark contacted several weeks back and got a response they have passed to their legal
spammers1 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 09:47
  #508 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Here
Posts: 62
Originally Posted by diffident View Post
I'm still waiting for that promised "emailed response" too. I'm not holding out much in the way of hope nor am I losing any sleep over it!
The great leaders of today don't communicate by email, his twitter response is all you can hope for #makejetaiwaysgreatagain
Ripton is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 10:56
  #509 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Wolverhampton
Posts: 2
Originally Posted by Ripton View Post
The great leaders of today don't communicate by email, his twitter response is all you can hope for #makejetaiwaysgreatagain
But he's not a great anything.
BTW - you missed the 'r'.
sixchannel is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 13:00
  #510 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: The Midlands
Age: 35
Posts: 178
In an interesting move, I was engaged in an hour long Q&A via twitter this morning.... enjoy.

Today's developments
diffident is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 13:12
  #511 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: London
Posts: 7
A joy to read. But until this point I had no idea about the Malaysian part. Also, what about traffic rights between all these countries? Normally they would have to be reciprocal so I'm very curious to find out which of these far eastern carriers is looking to increase their frequency into London and which airport - considering their current operations and as you mention the "somewhat" stringent slot availability... He threw yet more spanners into his own plans...

I pray every night this doesn't stop, not often do you get a self appointed muppet who doesn't mind the mockery....
TrueMagnetik is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 13:13
  #512 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 30
Originally Posted by diffident View Post
In an interesting move, I was engaged in an hour long Q&A via twitter this morning.... enjoy.

Today's developments

Good Kevin.
Of course, if he was legit he could come on here and provide answers and insight - being an aviation professional and all that.
"LOL" - as they say.
Auxtank is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 13:29
  #513 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: cyprus
Posts: 18
Hook, line and sinkhim

[QUOTE=diffident;10477918]In an interesting move, I was engaged in an hour long Q&A via twitter this morning.... enjoy.

Well said Kevin , good to see he is actually talking albet behind the faceless twooter accounts .
He can continue to dream and provide this endless entertainment to the community as keeps us all amused .
PS: Primark were also made aware of the trademark use by an ex employees and confirmed gone to their legal people so wonder if they will issue a desist notice very soon .
He will then need a brand manager or we could we all assist on here ?
spammers1 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 13:34
  #514 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: cyprus
Posts: 18
Hook, line and sinkhim

[QUOTE=diffident;10477918]In an interesting move, I was engaged in an hour long Q&A via twitter this morning.... enjoy.


Well said Kevin , good to see he is actually talking albet behind the faceless twooter accounts .
He can continue to dream and provide this endless entertainment to the community as keeps us all amused .
PS: Primark were also made aware of the trademark use by an ex employees and confirmed gone to their legal people so wonder if they will issue a desist notice very soon .
He will then need a brand manager or we could we all assist on here ?
spammers1 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 14:08
  #515 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: The Midlands
Age: 35
Posts: 178
Originally Posted by TrueMagnetik View Post
A joy to read. But until this point I had no idea about the Malaysian part. Also, what about traffic rights between all these countries? Normally they would have to be reciprocal so I'm very curious to find out which of these far eastern carriers is looking to increase their frequency into London and which airport - considering their current operations and as you mention the "somewhat" stringent slot availability... He threw yet more spanners into his own plans...

I pray every night this doesn't stop, not often do you get a self appointed muppet who doesn't mind the mockery....
Precisely, the complexity of what is going on here, for an upstart business is impossible. It simply doesn't work. As each day passes, more and more crap gets spouted! Today alone, I've been able to contact another handful of people through Mr. Unsworth's own responses!
diffident is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 15:03
  #516 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: France
Posts: 428
Is this not a case that might appeal to BBC's Watchdog or something similar? Or has JU not broken the law yet ... or not enough?
Alsacienne is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 15:09
  #517 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: The Midlands
Age: 35
Posts: 178
Originally Posted by Alsacienne View Post
Is this not a case that might appeal to BBC's Watchdog or something similar? Or has JU not broken the law yet ... or not enough?
Technically, the law has been broken several times. At the moment, "Atmosphere Intercontinental Airlines" is foul of the Companies Act for late filing of accounts - which at the time of posting are still overdue. The company is also misrepresenting its position, which would lead to a breach of contract should it enter into one with anybody. The laws of tort also apply, giving rise to fraudulent misrepresentation, deceit and dishonesty.

All pretty heavy stuff.
diffident is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 15:30
  #518 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: London
Posts: 7
Originally Posted by diffident View Post
Technically, the law has been broken several times. At the moment, "Atmosphere Intercontinental Airlines" is foul of the Companies Act for late filing of accounts - which at the time of posting are still overdue. The company is also misrepresenting its position, which would lead to a breach of contract should it enter into one with anybody. The laws of tort also apply, giving rise to fraudulent misrepresentation, deceit and dishonesty.

All pretty heavy stuff.
I'd be careful... Unworthy will accuse you of more smears...
TrueMagnetik is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 15:44
  #519 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 127
Nothing much will happen with Companies House, they will fine and eventually strike off. Criminal proceedings - highly unlikely.

Tort requires demonstration of loss, that is tough to show and will require a civil not criminal suit - who is going to throw money that way. So at present (and I sat for a decade on the Bench), I'm struggling to see much likelihood of the CPS getting excited.

I think more likely that Special Branch will want to chat about the Vicky Ford/Prime Minister/HMG Home Office logo claims.
docstone is offline  
Old 23rd May 2019, 15:47
  #520 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: The Midlands
Age: 35
Posts: 178
Originally Posted by docstone View Post
Nothing much will happen with Companies House, they will fine and eventually strike off. Criminal proceedings - highly unlikely.

Tort requires demonstration of loss, that is tough to show and will require a civil not criminal suit - who is going to throw money that way. So at present (and I sat for a decade on the Bench), I'm struggling to see much likelihood of the CPS getting excited.

I think more likely that Special Branch will want to chat about the Vicky Ford/Prime Minister/HMG Home Office logo claims.
Indeed. That's why I used the term 'technically'. In reality, along with the latter claims you have mentioned docstone, I also would anticipate that Trading Standards might become interested if the outlandish claims continued.

I wouldn't anticipate any state action other than that. Of course, CH will move to strike off before long.
diffident is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.