Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

AF66 CDG-LAX diverts - uncontained engine failure over Atlantic

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

AF66 CDG-LAX diverts - uncontained engine failure over Atlantic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Nov 2017, 21:47
  #521 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by slip and turn
Seems to be heading to East Midlands now. How it's going to get to Cardiff from there? Road?
Banana4321 is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2017, 13:48
  #522 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 68
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps a curfew at Cardiff, it was zero dark thirty, or thereabouts? Although that would surprise me. Otherwise the company may have another shipment from EMA. Road Transport may indeed be the chosen method.
ExXB is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2017, 07:23
  #523 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: FR
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some of you are probably reading "the other forums" (search for "deroutement cause dommages") but I copy some of the info found there (obviously, not official).
- ferry flight maybe for December 6th;
- maybe a/c will be under Airbus registration for that flight;
- it is mentioned that the 1st AF A380 3-eng ferry was in 2012, out of JFK.
pax2908 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 15:01
  #524 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
About to taxi to the runway, not sure on callsign

e: Air France 371V
runway 26, wind 16020G30

Last edited by oversteer; 6th Dec 2017 at 15:13.
oversteer is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 15:17
  #525 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Albuquerque USA
Posts: 174
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
in the air

Flight Radar24 is tracking it in flight under AFR371V, enroute to CDG.
archae86 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 15:20
  #526 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Goose Bay
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just passed overhead on takeoff.
knarfw is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 15:21
  #527 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Goose Bay
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
https://www.flightradar24.com/AFR371V/fc069bb
knarfw is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 15:32
  #528 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: on a blue balloon
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Over the coast at 35000 ft
oldchina is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 15:39
  #529 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Age: 46
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Currently at 560 knots ground speed @ 37k. I'm guessing that means all four engines are operating?
procede is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 15:48
  #530 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Goose Bay
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They did full power run ups on both outboard engines after they brought it out of the hangar.
knarfw is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 16:05
  #531 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
That makes sense - there was never any subsequent confirmation of the 3-engined ferry scenario after that initial soundbite from an unnamed BEA investigator that Reuters initially quoted.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 16:12
  #532 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
What a waste of about 300 posts here
WHBM is online now  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 20:15
  #533 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Just folks not letting the facts get in the way of a good story.

Aircraft landed at CDG a few moments ago.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 20:39
  #534 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why not Toulouse?
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 20:43
  #535 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Doncaster
Age: 50
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will they have kept it heated while it was stood? Must have been cold out there...
davidjpowell is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 20:54
  #536 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Goose Bay
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidjpowell
Will they have kept it heated while it was stood? Must have been cold out there...
It was hangared up until 2 days ago.
knarfw is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 21:04
  #537 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by G-CPTN
Why not Toulouse?
As a general rule, manufacturers are good at designing and building aircraft, but they don't necessarily have skills and expertise in repairing them, at least not as much as airlines do.

While Airbus will no doubt be involved in developing any necessary repair schemes, AF will be better equipped to supply the manpower and other resources to accomplish the repairs.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 21:09
  #538 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,407
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Currently at 560 knots ground speed @ 37k. I'm guessing that means all four engines are operating?
Not necessarily - a 747 can happily cruise at 37k Mach .84 on 3 engines providing it's not too heavy (been there, done that during 747-8 flight test). I assume an A380 would be similarly capable.
Doing a high power run up of the replaced engine is more meaningful.
tdracer is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 22:14
  #539 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
As a general rule, manufacturers are good at designing and building aircraft, but they don't necessarily have skills and expertise in repairing them, at least not as much as airlines do.

While Airbus will no doubt be involved in developing any necessary repair schemes, AF will be better equipped to supply the manpower and other resources to accomplish the repairs.

Well, the manufacturers have special repair teams for structural repair of stranded aircraft. That is done very often. Sometimes they do the whole work where the plane is stranded, sometimes they just get the aircraft repaired so that it can be ferried to some other facility.
EDML is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2017, 22:24
  #540 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,553
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by EDML
Well, the manufacturers have special repair teams for structural repair of stranded aircraft. That is done very often. Sometimes they do the whole work where the plane is stranded, sometimes they just get the aircraft repaired so that it can be ferried to some other facility.
Given everything else that goes on there I wonder if Airbus even have the space/hangarage at Blagnac...(? genuine question) it might well be more convenient for them to shuttle people as and if needed up to Paris and use AF facilities at CDG than to tie up AB resources and space at Toulouse.
wiggy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.