Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

AF66 CDG-LAX diverts - uncontained engine failure over Atlantic

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

AF66 CDG-LAX diverts - uncontained engine failure over Atlantic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 09:23
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sorry Dog
It's a little hard to tell from only 2 picture angles but it almost appears the remainder of the engine nearly fell off after the event. The entire assembly appears torqued around the pylon with the pylon starting to crumple from the force. It all depends on how quickly the remaining rotating assembly stopped but it's easy to imagine that torque being in 10 thousands plus of foot pounds. Then you have to think about the wing structure the pylon is tied to...

On an engine missing ferry, I would wonder if a ballast load is needed to keep the same general flutter margins. The first 74's needed DU weights on the outer engine pair to pass flutter test in certification.
You mean like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ca4PgyBJAzM
GHOTI is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 09:34
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Sweden
Age: 47
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Material science tech here.

I would bet you lots of money that this is due to material failure. Most likely manufacturing issue, like the Sioux event.

Pictures tells me the fracture edges are sharp and clean which suggests rapid phase change in the material, to the point of breaking.

The initiating event might have been a smaller fracture in f.ex. a fan blade (or what else floats your boat) and the accompanying force redistribution was enough that the flawed crystal structures said bye bye and left the building with the entire front attached.
MrSnuggles is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 10:56
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: on the ground
Posts: 444
Received 32 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by GHOTI
The resemblance to footage of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge (also near Seattle!) is uncanny.
nonsense is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 11:17
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: se england
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 48 Likes on 21 Posts
OAP

Thank you for your interesting and courteous correction of my comment about airloads and speeds. Why I sat where I did and you sat where you did LoL. Me being wrong about the loading and the diversion field.

All the same not a scenario many people are ever going to face
pax britanica is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 12:35
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
True, the failure rates are extremely low. Modern aircraft and engines are designed to very high standards.
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 13:40
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't this the second incident on the A380 where there was an engine blow out? Qantas flight 32. Can't be due to a specific engine supplier as the former uses GP7000 and the latter uses the Trent 900. Could this be a fault in engine design or just poor maintenance?
Foxdeux is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 14:10
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Germany
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@foxdeux pls read up on what exactly happened

on AF66 the FAN including the fandisk detached from the shaft and departed the aircraft
on QF32 the TURBINE disk FRACTURED

and the engines are very different not just a different supplier. so it can be a fault in engine design but it can't be the same one because a fracturing oil tube (what happened on QF32) would not make the fan depart the aircraft.

btw the QF32 manufacturing fault grounded a significant part of the A380 fleet and was rectified.
did you even read this thread? :/
wiedehopf is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 15:09
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think a fan blade failure would cause this. I also don't think a fan disk failure would cause it either as the fan disk is too far forward of the separation point. More likely is the failure emanated right at the point of separation of the fan module. Located at or very close to that that separation point is a shaft coupling (fan to LPT shaft) and a bearing structure. I think the conical fractured piece in the Ave Herald photo is part of the bearing support or seal system. More likely, there was a bearing problem that caused the shaft to fracture at that point. See the engine cross-section below:

https://www.tumblr.com/search/gp7200

Also, I don't think the remaining portion of the engine was about to fall off. The engine to pylon mounting system and attachment points are well engineered as are the pylon to wing mounting and attachment points. Think about something, during a turbulent air event, the plane could drop 500 feet or more and abruptly bottom out, the full weight of the engine (14,000 lbs + the weight of the nacelle) pulling against the pylon and pylon to wing. Vertical, side and rotational load factors are taken into account during the design processes with significant safety margins applied. Everything survives thanks to the robust designs employed...
Turbine D is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 15:52
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I guess this is one case where we can accurately say 'The front fell off'.
EEngr is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 16:00
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wiedehopf
@foxdeux pls read up on what exactly happened

on AF66 the FAN including the fandisk detached from the shaft and departed the aircraft
on QF32 the TURBINE disk FRACTURED

and the engines are very different not just a different supplier. so it can be a fault in engine design but it can't be the same one because a fracturing oil tube (what happened on QF32) would not make the fan depart the aircraft.

btw the QF32 manufacturing fault grounded a significant part of the A380 fleet and was rectified.
did you even read this thread? :/
There's 8 pages of comments, I don't have time to sift through all of them. But thank you for taking the time to explain to me the different causes of the AF and QF flights. I just thought they were somewhat similar because engines 'breaking apart' like that is a very rare occurrence in commercial aviation and AF and QF are by no means budget airlines so if it's a maintenance issue I would be concerned with the airlines. So by deductive reasoning I assumed it would most likely be caused by a flaw in design, I'm not an aviation technical expert, just an enthusiast.
Foxdeux is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 16:22
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nonsense
The resemblance to footage of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge (also near Seattle!) is uncanny.
Peter Garrison wrote the definitive article on flutter a few years ago for Air&Space magazine, beginning with the L-188 and the Tacoma Narrows Bridge.
https://www.airspacemag.com/military...r-1873980/?all
GHOTI is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 17:13
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Coastal Georgia
Age: 71
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would bet you lots of money that this is due to material failure. Most likely manufacturing issue, like the Sioux event.
Agree.

Located at or very close to that that separation point is a shaft coupling (fan to LPT shaft) and a bearing structure. I think the conical fractured piece in the Ave Herald photo is part of the bearing support or seal system.
Without specific knowledge or a GP7000 IPC to view we are guessing at best.

Engine Alliance Service: 24/7 Parts & Support for GP7200
Propulsor Advantage

Modeled after the successful GE90 program, the GP7200 fan module splits from the rest of the engine, allowing you to save money on spare engine costs.
Not quite the advantage advertised.

Not much money to bet but do see a grounding coming.
......
number0009 is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 17:21
  #153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada/Malaysia
Age: 83
Posts: 272
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
...meanwhile - confusion reigns getting the ducks in order...

Agencies dither over who leads A380 engine explosion probe | Reuters
BlankBox is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 17:22
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,558
Received 38 Likes on 17 Posts
I had a look at a GP7200 cutaway. Interestingly it seems the first 5 or 6 compressor stages turn with the fan.

The failure seems to be where the fan attaches to its end of the LP shaft.

Let's just be grateful that the fan didn't contact the airframe after departing the engine.
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 17:26
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sometimes north, sometimes south
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Not sure if anyone has already made this point but given AF066's route right up the middle of the UK it's a relief this didn't happen earlier in the flight, with large chunks of metal potentially falling into populated areas
NorthSouth is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 17:45
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,406
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
I had a look at a GP7200 cutaway. Interestingly it seems the first 5 or 6 compressor stages turn with the fan.
That's common design practice for both Pratt and GE. GE refers to the compressor stages on the LP shaft as the "booster" or "booster stages", Pratt simply calls that the LP Compressor.
The only big turbofan engines I'm familiar with that don't have that feature are the three spool Rolls engines.
tdracer is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 18:26
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,815
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by NorthSouth
Not sure if anyone has already made this point but given AF066's route right up the middle of the UK it's a relief this didn't happen earlier in the flight, with large chunks of metal potentially falling into populated areas
Though on the other hand, if it had departed over anywhere in the UK, it would almost certainly have been recovered by now.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 18:56
  #158 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Though on the other hand, if it had departed over anywhere in the UK, it would almost certainly have been recovered by now.
If the enquiry hasn't officially started, nobody will be searching for the missing pieces.
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 18:59
  #159 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the conical fractured piece in the Ave Herald photo is part of the bearing support or seal system.
Actually, from a better cutaway view of the GP7200 engine, the partial conical fractured piece in the photo appears to be part of the fan short shaft that stayed with the engine when it fractured...
Turbine D is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2017, 19:11
  #160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
number0009,
Without specific knowledge or a GP7000 IPC to view we are guessing at best.
Here you go, thanks to pax2908! You can enlarge it, just click on the art work.
http://www.pw.utc.com/Content/GP7200...taway_high.jpg
Turbine D is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.