AF66 CDG-LAX diverts - uncontained engine failure over Atlantic
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: It used to be an island...
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's a lot of rotational energy in the fan. Once the flange failure began its progress, the fan would wobble and remove whatever beside the containment ring that was in the way, mostly cowl.
There have been accounts of propellers coming off the crankshaft. The prop departs forward until gravity directs it down. Likely the fan took a similar trajectory.
Kudos to the containment ring.
There have been accounts of propellers coming off the crankshaft. The prop departs forward until gravity directs it down. Likely the fan took a similar trajectory.
Kudos to the containment ring.
In a typical high-bypass engine, the fan provides about 80% of the thrust, so Mr Newton tells us that liberated fan is only going to head in one direction (initially, at least).
As for the cowl, the intake lip diameter is typically less than the fan diameter, so a departing fan isn't going to leave the cowl behind, whether wobbling or not.
The suggested failure modes still don't fully add up. The fan would have been producing a leisurely five or six tons or so of thrust, which wouldn't have troubled anything compared to the previous take-off loads, so this isn't an overload failure.
If the LP drive shaft end had failed first, say from fatigue, there would not have been such a clean failure of all the fasteners on the LP compressor drive flange. The flange is pretty well undamaged apart from secondary impacts. And if the failure had been caused by all its fasteners being unsecured and falling out one by one, you would expect the final ones to have ovalised their holes. Which I can't see.
If the LP drive shaft end had failed first, say from fatigue, there would not have been such a clean failure of all the fasteners on the LP compressor drive flange. The flange is pretty well undamaged apart from secondary impacts. And if the failure had been caused by all its fasteners being unsecured and falling out one by one, you would expect the final ones to have ovalised their holes. Which I can't see.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my head
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quite so. After all, a fan isn't much more than a big prop.
In a typical high-bypass engine, the fan provides about 80% of the thrust, so Mr Newton tells us that liberated fan is only going to head in one direction (initially, at least).
As for the cowl, the intake lip diameter is typically less than the fan diameter, so a departing fan isn't going to leave the cowl behind, whether wobbling or not.
In a typical high-bypass engine, the fan provides about 80% of the thrust, so Mr Newton tells us that liberated fan is only going to head in one direction (initially, at least).
As for the cowl, the intake lip diameter is typically less than the fan diameter, so a departing fan isn't going to leave the cowl behind, whether wobbling or not.
Fan would not exit like a prop at all. At the rotational sppeds they do the fan would be absolutely rigid (like a toque converter,) As soon as it encountered something fixed it would start chewing it but it would also 'rotate around that point' then it would most likely roll around the inside of the containment (or cowl) until it chewed or forced its way out. By then it might have generated quite a lot of transverse energy and would depart perhaps forward but also in the random direction where it finally got free. Unless it hit something really rigid gyro effect would keep it 'upright.' 20% chance it chews into something important like the fuselage or No 2?
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: WA STATE
Age: 78
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Broadly agreed and my knowledge of the coupling between angular momentum and linear momentum is far too stale to argue convincingly, but consider the hammer thrower in his cage. As a professional wobbler, he’s an effective converter of one to the other, albeit with no propeller attached! There surely was wobble here, however brief, and the last part of the fan case to let go might largely determine the ultimate trajectory, do we think?
To reparaphrase Ernie Gann- re aircraft accidents -- sometimes an unknown genie doesn't unzip his pants and urinate on the pillars of science..
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Leicester, UK
Age: 77
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are high-time GP7200s still flying? Given that, as CONSO notes above, physics never takes a holiday, should they be?
Last edited by SStreeter; 3rd Oct 2017 at 20:14. Reason: Better sense
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Stump Towers
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
Age: 79
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Voice recording
If you will forgive a non-professional intervening.
There are obvious benefits to having long term voice and other audio recordings. There are also obvious dangers, especially in an era of management by surveillance.
Understanding that what is suggested is a non-survivable recording, and given that 12 hours of CD quality audio will fit on about 12GB, would the solution be recording onto an SD card in some non-rugged outboard of the CVR system, with the SD card being the property of the captain, to be removed at the end of the flight unless there's a need of the recording?
There are obvious benefits to having long term voice and other audio recordings. There are also obvious dangers, especially in an era of management by surveillance.
Understanding that what is suggested is a non-survivable recording, and given that 12 hours of CD quality audio will fit on about 12GB, would the solution be recording onto an SD card in some non-rugged outboard of the CVR system, with the SD card being the property of the captain, to be removed at the end of the flight unless there's a need of the recording?
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Potomac Heights
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think what ChrisVJ is suggesting is that it will have converted a portion of its rotational energy into transverse energy -- not that it will magically generate more total energy.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Understanding that what is suggested is a non-survivable recording, and given that 12 hours of CD quality audio will fit on about 12GB, would the solution be recording onto an SD card in some non-rugged outboard of the CVR system, with the SD card being the property of the captain, to be removed at the end of the flight unless there's a need of the recording?
You cannot just put consumer HW into a unit like that. There are far higher requirements with regards to reliability (temperature, high altitude radiation ...)
Furthermore: after 1-2 years consumer chips will no longer be manufactured. So the whole process would need to be started again. The certification surely costs > 100.000 USD and takes many months. That can't be done all the time. Therefore HW like that relies on special industrial chips that are made for a long period of time. Those chips are not developed like consumer HW.
I think what ChrisVJ is suggesting is that it will have converted a portion of its rotational energy into transverse energy -- not that it will magically generate more total energy.
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SF Bay area, CA USA
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FlightlessParrot wrote:
"Understanding that what is suggested is a non-survivable recording, and given that 12 hours of CD quality audio will fit on about 12GB, would the solution be recording onto an SD card in some non-rugged outboard of the CVR system, with the SD card being the property of the captain, to be removed at the end of the flight unless there's a need of the recording?"
Convince a French prosecutor it's OK the Captain takes home the CVR recording at the end of shift, ever.
"Understanding that what is suggested is a non-survivable recording, and given that 12 hours of CD quality audio will fit on about 12GB, would the solution be recording onto an SD card in some non-rugged outboard of the CVR system, with the SD card being the property of the captain, to be removed at the end of the flight unless there's a need of the recording?"
Convince a French prosecutor it's OK the Captain takes home the CVR recording at the end of shift, ever.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my head
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Back on the subject of the failure itself, it is clearly understatement to suggest that a lot of extremely complex thought has gone into the scenario over the years - it seems there are a number of papers on the subject of computer models for fan containment and of non-axisymmetric loads generated when something goes wrong (typically an FBO), but I am not sure any address the possibility of the loss of the fan rotor and fancase in their entirety as I suppose that actually counts as ... ehm ... uncontained in one major sense!
For those interested, a start point might be the bright-coloured pictures - especially Figs 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 in this (matching?) pair of papers. They share the same title but the second was published later so may be a revised version of the first - apologies, but I haven't managed to fully compare them:
For those interested, a start point might be the bright-coloured pictures - especially Figs 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 in this (matching?) pair of papers. They share the same title but the second was published later so may be a revised version of the first - apologies, but I haven't managed to fully compare them:
- Sinha, Sunil & Ojha, Sujit. (2012). Rotordynamic Analysis of Asymmetric Turbofan Rotor Due to Fan Blade-out Event with Contact-Impact Rub Loads. 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 2012. . 10.2514/6.2012-1481.
- Sinha, Sunil. (2013). Rotordynamic analysis of asymmetric turbofan rotor due to fan blade-loss event with contact-impact rub loads. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 332. 2253–2283. 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.11.033.
Last edited by slip and turn; 5th Oct 2017 at 06:53.
Pax2908's drawing shows exactly what was argued earlier. The LP compressor hub flange is fixed to the rear of the fan disc and is in fact only supported by the fan disc. When the fan separates from its shaft one would expect the LP compressor hub (together with its 5 stages of compressor blades) to be thorn out of the engine but instead the compressor hub mounting flange separated quite nicely, despite the many fastening bolts.
So an initial failure of the shaft to fan (where a jagged piece remains) would allow the fan to pull forward. The 24 (?) bolts holding the compressor stage failed under tension (photo in #194). That may be by design. To let the fan go forwardvwithout trying to pull the compressor rotor through the stator.
The preference is that given a major fan failure all you want is a safe shutdown with the engine staying on the wing with no fires. You gladly give up scrapping every darn piece of the engine to keep the bits from leaving. However given that the fan hub itself splits into pieces you must expect the movement of these pieces will result in tensile shear of any attachments to other rotating bits like compressor spools and/or drive shafts.
I take it that some have not noted what looks to be an intact fan blade and its attachments lodged in the vanes behind the fan?
I take it that some have not noted what looks to be an intact fan blade and its attachments lodged in the vanes behind the fan?