Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Lufthansa Frankfurt - Toronto diverted to Manchester

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Lufthansa Frankfurt - Toronto diverted to Manchester

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Apr 2017, 18:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockport MAN/EGCC
Age: 70
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lufthansa Frankfurt - Toronto diverted to Manchester

Apparently on Thursday afternoon a Lufthansa B.747 en route Frankfurt to Toronto was diverted to Manchester to deposit a drunken passenger and his luggage.
Hope they get the full bill.
Would a fuel dump be required this early in a long haul flight ?
The AvgasDinosaur is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2017, 19:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Isla Grande
Posts: 997
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh my God. A diversion.....
gearlever is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2017, 19:29
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockport MAN/EGCC
Age: 70
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I asked a serious question in my post as well
The AvgasDinosaur is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2017, 19:29
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Likely no as I don't expect it would have a full fuel load for that 'short' a trip.
B2N2 is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2017, 19:33
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockport MAN/EGCC
Age: 70
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Many thanks for your prompt reply.
The AvgasDinosaur is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2017, 19:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Looks to me like they did a little maneuvering at altitude to burn down to landing weight and/or get a welcoming party ready at Manchester:

https://www.flightradar24.com/data/f...lh470/#cf90756

https://flightaware.com/live/flight/...210Z/EDDF/EGCC
Airbubba is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2017, 19:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cambridge, England, EU
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by The AvgasDinosaur
a drunken passenger
How come?


(1) Drunk on boarding the plane (gate staff failure)
(2) Got drunk on board from alcohol supplied by cabin crew (cabin crew failure)
(3) Got drunk on board from alcohol carried into the airport (security staff failure)


or


(4) Got drunk on board from alcohol purchased duty free (about the only way it couldn't have been partially someone else's fault)
Gertrude the Wombat is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2017, 20:26
  #8 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: England
Age: 77
Posts: 4,138
Received 222 Likes on 65 Posts
OK Gertrude. Since you want to blame everyone except the drunk himself:

1, Drunk on boarding. Would have been spotted by cabin crew

2. Alcohol supplied by cabin crew. How much can you drink in that short time?

3. Alcohol carried through security. No way.

4. Alcohol purchased duty free. Yep, and probably poured into a soft-drink bottle to get past the cabin crew. Thinks he's (she's) clever. Throw the book at them.
Herod is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2017, 20:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: EGNX
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
David - to give you a slightly more detailed answer - I do not know whether this was a 747-400 or -800 but let's assume it was the former. EDIT - it was the 747-400

The aircraft empty weight is around 187 tonnes.
Maximum landing weight is c297 tonnes (MTOW is over 400t) so there are 110 tonnes available for fuel and payload.

Typical payload for a reasonably full flight with some cargo will be in the region of 40 tonnes so that leaves 70 tonnes for fuel.

Including reserves and diversion fuel this would provide around 7 hours of flight time so on a day where no significant delays are forecast (e.g due to weather) this would mean that a diversion could be carried out somewhere between 5 and 6 hours from the destination without the need to burn off or dump fuel.

EDIT: having seen the flight plot this looks consistent with the circuits the aircraft flew which appear to take around 30 minutes.

Last edited by Doors to Automatic; 8th Apr 2017 at 21:26.
Doors to Automatic is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2017, 21:51
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Holland
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it was a 747-400 , max Landing weight allowed is 285.800 KG, otherwise it's an overweight landing
slam_dunk is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2017, 23:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,812
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
Originally Posted by Airbubba
Looks to me like they did a little maneuvering at altitude to burn down to landing weight and/or get a welcoming party ready at Manchester
Half an hour at FL340 isn't going to make much difference to the landing weight, unless they were dumping as well as burning ...
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 09:00
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Age: 62
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The aircraft involved was D-ABVU, a 747-430.
Big Eric is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 15:02
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: EGNX
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Half an hour at FL340 isn't going to make much difference to the landing weight, unless they were dumping as well as burning ...
About 5 tonnes?
Doors to Automatic is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2017, 15:47
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,548
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
If it was a 747-400 , max Landing weight allowed is 285.800 KG, otherwise it's an overweight landing
Yep, that was certainly the number for ours.....As I recall it ballpark figures figures were if you were up to max ZFW you'd generally need to dump down to around 40 tonnes in tanks before you were at Max Ldg Wt ( structural).

Tanks fuel for the flight in question at departure may have been in the vicinity of 70, plus/minus tonnes, they may well have burnt 10 tonnes climbing out and during the short cruise, so maybe 60 tonnes left in tanks when it went pear shaped with the drunk......so at the risk of speculating ( but isn't that what we are here for) I'd have thought they would have needed to dump around 20 tonnes, maybe less if the ZFW was below max.

TBH can't remember the 744 dump rate...
wiggy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.