Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Thomson 787 just landed at Heathrow. Cyprus to LGW

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Thomson 787 just landed at Heathrow. Cyprus to LGW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Sep 2016, 19:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London
Age: 50
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thomson 787 just landed at Heathrow. Cyprus to LGW

Can anyone confirm the above just tracking on flight radar 24. Glitch maybe!!
ukdean is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2016, 19:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ---------->
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
see my thread, there's issues with the runway at gatwick, hole/crack
EGLD is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2016, 19:30
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: derby
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it's true. I believe it's a hole in the runway at Gatwick, again!
hatton is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2016, 19:38
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London
Age: 50
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hatton
I think it's true. I believe it's a hole in the runway at Gatwick, again!
Strange divert for Thomson. No ops at Heathrow. Never seen this before.
ukdean is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2016, 20:51
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ---------->
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe the Thomson pilots wanted to land at a big boy's airport??
EGLD is offline  
Old 4th Sep 2016, 22:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by ukdean
Strange divert for Thomson. No ops at Heathrow. Never seen this before.
Where would you suggest they ought to have landed to make it easier to get the pax back to Gatwick ?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2016, 08:41
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Woking, Surrey
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Where would you suggest they ought to have landed to make it easier to get the pax back to Gatwick ?

Was this the one that's departed this morning from Heathrow at 08.31? (G-TUID?)
shugrover is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2016, 13:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where would you suggest they ought to have landed to make it easier to get the pax back to Gatwick ?
Erm Bournemouth or Luton would probably have been better options, at least for having some rapid ops for the aircraft to be received and sent back to where it is needed... Seeing as Thomson has bases at both these airports too.

Heathrow may well be nearer, however this is irrelevant if there is no Thomson base at LHR and therefore no one readily available to process or handle the inbound pax baggage and transfers etc.
T250 is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2016, 14:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by shugrover
Was this the one that's departed this morning from Heathrow at 08.31? (G-TUID?)
Yes (although the B788 in question was G-TUIB, rather than D).

It looks like it managed to position back to Gatwick without any problem.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2016, 14:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<Erm Bournemouth or Luton would probably have been better options,>>

Suggest you drop a line to the Captain via the airline so that he becomes aware of your suggestion should he find himself in a similar situation in future.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2016, 14:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: west midlands
Age: 53
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T250.

Heathrow is the standard alternate for Gatwick on all fleets at Thomson.
oceanhawk is offline  
Old 6th Sep 2016, 15:29
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow is the standard alternate for Gatwick on all fleets at Thomson.
Might want to check the AIP on that one. You can't just flight plan any alternate and just expect to be accepted there by ATC. Unless of course you are declaring an emergency (in this case it was not an emergency, just a diversion).

See here for more info, we discussed it recently in ATC forum.

http://www.pprune.org/atc-issues/581...alternate.html
T250 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2016, 10:20
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow is the standard alternate for Gatwick on all fleets at Thomson.

There are fuel alternates for legal planning purposes and alternates for company diversions. I suspect LHR is the former; but I would expect the captain to be in contact with the handling agent at LGW and execute company instructions. The responsibility of gaining permission from LHR would be on mission control not the crew. "I was only obeying orders, guv," comes to mind.
RAT 5 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.