Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Flight KL1277 KLM Boeing 737-700 Amsterdam Edinburgh squawk code 7700

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Flight KL1277 KLM Boeing 737-700 Amsterdam Edinburgh squawk code 7700

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Apr 2015, 17:06
  #21 (permalink)  
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On the western edge of The Moor
Age: 67
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Broken Donk

Incident: KLM B737 near Norwich on Apr 28th 2015, engine shut down in flight

Designed to fly on one, close enough to return I would suggest.
Not aware of any absolute must land rule
west lakes is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2015, 17:27
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,822
Received 206 Likes on 94 Posts
Originally Posted by Paulus705
Quote:
"If the aircraft really made an instantaneous 90° turn at 06:38,"

Looks like 180° to me.
instantaneous - definition of instantaneous by The Free Dictionary
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2015, 20:33
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally wouldn't it be better to fly to nearest airport than risk a over water flight on one engine... Without knowing why the first engine shut down. Folk would have been at less risk and easily bussed up/over to EDI.
Silver Pegasus is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2015, 21:33
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How do we know the crew didn't know what caused the IFSD? You can't say pax would have been at less risk by landing at the nearest airport...as AMS would probably have been the crew's home base, they'd presumably be intimately familiar with the approaches, airfield layout, nav & comm frequencies, local ATC etc etc. All of which makes the subsequent single engine approach and landing easier and less stressful, which I respectfully suggest is much more of a safety benefit than avoiding 20 mins over the sea. Sounds like a no-brainer especially with the a/c positioned 100 or so miles from AMS at FL400?
NudgingSteel is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.