Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

UPS218 squawk 7700 diverts to Heathrow

Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

UPS218 squawk 7700 diverts to Heathrow

Old 18th Jul 2014, 07:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berks
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UPS218 squawk 7700 diverts to Heathrow

I see that UPS218, squawking 7700, from CDG to Philadelphia, has just landed at LHR, having diverted from over the Brest peninsular. I know these things happen all the time but wouldn't a French airport or even Stansted have been a more logical alternate in the early morning rush ?
Golf-Mike-Mike is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 08:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nature of the failure and it's effects, closest Airfield, longest runway, best weather, best rescue and firefighting services available, crew familiarity, terrain, company port......

All the things that go into the mix in the Captains head.

I'm sure he did what he needed to do and the professional ATC in London did their usual brilliant job.

Well done.

Last edited by nitpicker330; 18th Jul 2014 at 11:32.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 08:32
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: france
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A freight plane like UPS diverts, if possible, at the nearest open (schedule) accessible (weather, limitations) international UPS base able to handle the freight quickly to destination and resolve the problem and new problems (replacement plane, spare parts, crew). Probably it was LHR.
I.e.Emery freight, T.O. Maastricht, Fog at destination Roissy at 4:00 or 5:00 LT, we tried the approach, and then if impossible we diverted to Brussels or Cologne .
roulishollandais is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 09:03
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berks
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks I take your point but then why not just go back to CDG - closer, still open and active, point of origin, similar distance to go, known weather ?
Golf-Mike-Mike is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 09:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow isnt a UPS base, UPS aircraft never use LHR. Stansted is, CDG is. So the question remains, why divert to LHR?
hampshireandy is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 09:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Instead of arguing on here, why not ring the Captain and ask him what he thimks he was doing?
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 09:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: England
Posts: 399
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
More to the point, wait and see. Since the subject flight landed in the UK, if anything significant happened we'll get a good analysis in due course.
OldLurker is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 09:27
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: brisbane,qld,australia
Posts: 276
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well said HD !
emeritus is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 09:28
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
HD

Heathrow isnt a UPS base, UPS aircraft never use LHR. Stansted is, CDG is. So the question remains, why divert to LHR?
With

squawking 7700
At no point in emergency handling is 'fly to the most convenient ( i.e. company base) airport' a consideration.

Last edited by Fox3WheresMyBanana; 18th Jul 2014 at 13:50.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 09:28
  #10 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Instead of arguing on here, why not ring the Captain and ask him what he thimks he was doing?
Probably too late, as he's most likely already at his girlfriend's* flat that is near Heathrow.




* Or boyfriend's as the case may be.


And no I don't mean it that way, after all, the captain could be a lady.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 09:40
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: france
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Transporting Li-ion batteries are better equiped firemen in LHR ?
roulishollandais is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 10:38
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berks
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ HD
I had no intention of starting an argument, this was just an innocent enquiry as it seemed strange to fly to the busiest airport around rather than return to CDG, Orly or elsewhere closer or at a similar distance.
As for ringing the pilot, as you can probably guess as I posted the question, he's not in my phone book

Last edited by Golf-Mike-Mike; 18th Jul 2014 at 11:03.
Golf-Mike-Mike is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 10:46
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berks
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ Fox3Banana
I don't recall saying convenient, I said logical (ie having weighed up all the circumstances of the emergency and all the options for a diversion). But thanks for your help and insight
Golf-Mike-Mike is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 11:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: france
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
distance, time, ATC efficiency

Brest-London=470 km
Brest-Paris =590 km
roulishollandais is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 11:15
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
GMM - My previous post was a bit sarcastic; my apologies. However, the fact that an airfield is your company's base is only a matter of convenience after the landing - it has zero influence on dealing with the inflight emergency.
Nearest, best runway you can reach with the jet in the state it's in is what is wanted.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 11:31
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yep, read my post above.

That is what the Captain would have done.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 11:36
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Here and there
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The weather around STN this morning was far from ideal. Depending on when this happened, this might have been a reason...
seventhreedriver is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 12:31
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the dark side of the moon
Posts: 976
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
A slight right turn towards LHR at altitude also takes up far fewer miles and minutes than executing a 180 degree turn back to CDG. There was an old country song that included the line,

"Gimme 40 acres and I'll turn this rig around".

Think miles instead of minutes.
J.O. is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 12:33
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berks
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by seventhreedriver
The weather around STN this morning was far from ideal. Depending on when this happened, this might have been a reason...
Good point, perhaps CDG had a threat of storms too. As pointed out above the true reason will come out sometime, somehow, I was just curious.
Golf-Mike-Mike is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2014, 12:35
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berks
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by J.O.
A slight right turn towards LHR at altitude also takes up far fewer miles and minutes ...
Think miles instead of minutes.
Actually on FR24 he did a couple of large left and right orbits before setting out for Heathrow.
Golf-Mike-Mike is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.