EVA Air 747 without nosegear at LHR
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EVA Air 747 without nosegear at LHR
Arrived at LHR this morning to see an EVA 747-400 parked on stand but with its tail about 30' higher than it should be. Closer inspection showed no nosegear and the nose buried in the concrete.
Anyone know what happened?
Anyone know what happened?
going boldly
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apparently the BA guys were troubleshooting a hydraulic leak on one of the main gears. This required lifting the landing gear lever to the up position. This wouldn't normally be a problem if the nose gear downlock pin is correctly installed, but the pin rests on the nose gear doors and when the doors opened as the first part of the gear sequence, the pin fell out as it wasn't correctly latched into position, consequently the nose gear retracted.
The aircraft also suffered damage to an entry door which came down onto a set of steps, which also set off the escape slide.
Unfortunately, the aircraft also settled onto the fixed electrical ground power unit, which got buried into the fuselage.
So I think that this might be a tad expensive to repair!
The aircraft also suffered damage to an entry door which came down onto a set of steps, which also set off the escape slide.
Unfortunately, the aircraft also settled onto the fixed electrical ground power unit, which got buried into the fuselage.
So I think that this might be a tad expensive to repair!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The Beautiful South
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Been done before.....no doubt that it will happen again 
Northwest at LGW, Corseair at Cardiff and probably plenty of others......
You have got to feel sorry for all involved.... just imagine sitting on the flight deck, selecting "up" and then experiencing that sinking feeling. Ouch !
Northwest at LGW, Corseair at Cardiff and probably plenty of others......
You have got to feel sorry for all involved.... just imagine sitting on the flight deck, selecting "up" and then experiencing that sinking feeling. Ouch !
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Home
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did this procedure last month to determine the state of a hydraulic leak in the up line. It is a safe procedure IF the pins are installed correctly But as the picture shows make a mistake and it will bite you in the ar$e.
Will BA be footing the repair bill for this one and will EVA trust them to do the repair
Will BA be footing the repair bill for this one and will EVA trust them to do the repair
(a bear of little brain)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: 51 10 03.70N 2 58 37.15W
Age: 75
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Piton, according to rumour in the trade (systems testing) when they were testing the first airbus systems they did extensive tests on simulators and everything looked fine and they were due to start testing in a real aircraft.
Everything was installed, the chief tester came along, sat down in the pilots chair, raised the gear handle............... and got a nasty sinking feeling.
Does show you can't test everything in simulators.
Everything was installed, the chief tester came along, sat down in the pilots chair, raised the gear handle............... and got a nasty sinking feeling.
Does show you can't test everything in simulators.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At risk of unleashing the usual Pprune ire on a simple question,
Does the aircraft slip down gracefully or fall like a brick?
And if its the latter then its a good job the maintenance guys were not underneath.......
Does the aircraft slip down gracefully or fall like a brick?
And if its the latter then its a good job the maintenance guys were not underneath.......
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
pprecious,
You're not alone -- I was wondering the same thing.
Also, aside from the nose section, obviously, how much structure needs to be checked from something like this. Looks like the nacelles on engines #2 and #3 are resting on the ground, do you then have to check the pylons for stress, does possible damage then extend into the wing?
Just curious as to how much potential damage can be expected from an event like this?
Thanks!
You're not alone -- I was wondering the same thing.
Also, aside from the nose section, obviously, how much structure needs to be checked from something like this. Looks like the nacelles on engines #2 and #3 are resting on the ground, do you then have to check the pylons for stress, does possible damage then extend into the wing?
Just curious as to how much potential damage can be expected from an event like this?
Thanks!
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: UK
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spanners,
Two different bits of the beeb been in touch with us at the Towers regarding using the photo. PM me if interested.
If not please ignore everything after, 'Good morning.'
Regards
rob
Two different bits of the beeb been in touch with us at the Towers regarding using the photo. PM me if interested.
If not please ignore everything after, 'Good morning.'
Regards
rob
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An engineer was killed not so long ago on a 737 when something was connected the wrong way round during maint and when the pumps where selected the nose gear retracted. At the end of the day aircraft can be replaced/repaired people cant.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BA Engineering (if BA Eng did handle the EVA air incident) and 747 Nosewheels (up on ground) are regrettably becoming a theme:
AAIB Report G-AWNE
Note it quotes:
(I cannot find URLs for these 2...)
NoD
AAIB Report G-AWNE
Note it quotes:
In June 1996 a similar incident had occurredat the operator's engineering base at Cardiff (AAIB Bulletin 12/96). Following this earlier incident the staff at Cardiff made andactioned a number of recommendations to prevent a similar occurrence. These recommendations were not reviewed or actioned at the operator'smain base at Heathrow.
In February 1998 a similar incident occurredat the operator's Gatwick base.
In February 1998 a similar incident occurredat the operator's Gatwick base.
NoD
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Virgin slit - any number of reasons the flaps could be extended. Wheels up landing inspection ..............
defect rectification or inducement ( similar to pilot induced turbulence )
Suspected birdstrike, lubrication of a drive system, rigging checks..........literally 100's of reasons, all non sinister with the exception of the first 2 tongue in cheek examples.
defect rectification or inducement ( similar to pilot induced turbulence ) Suspected birdstrike, lubrication of a drive system, rigging checks..........literally 100's of reasons, all non sinister with the exception of the first 2 tongue in cheek examples.
