Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > South Asia and the Far East
Reload this Page >

KOREAN AIRLINES - 10 days ON & 8 OFF policy

Wikiposts
Search
South Asia and the Far East News and views on the fast growing and changing aviation scene on the planet.

KOREAN AIRLINES - 10 days ON & 8 OFF policy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Nov 2009, 04:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KOREAN AIRLINES - 10 days ON & 8 OFF policy

Hi Guys

Honesty pays. I am a 777 Captain with Emirates and looking at Korean Airlines with an AUCKLAND base. Been on the radar for some time but due my personal circumstance with children, it was not suitable. Recently I heard that Korean has adopted a “new policy” option: YES or NO?

Queries:
  • 10 days ON & 8 days OFF.
  • Are flights rostered “in/out” of your own base ie. AKL?
  • Is there any opportunity to “operate” back to your home base during the 10 days?
  • Is this in writing and/or verbal?
  • Is it working in practice?
  • Any additional info appreciated for guys based in NZ.
  • Any chance anyone can personal mail me that may have left Emirates for
Korean.

Safe flying
BW
bluewater is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2009, 08:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: united arab emirates
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure about the new days off. Check with the contract agency they are quite forthcoming with that sort of info.

Good luck , I,ll tell you this though. Be prepared to stand in a long line for this job. There is inspite of the adds for non type rated guys no shortage of highly qualified applicants. Like yourself EK , EY, QR , SQ , BA etc. All looking at this job.

Also a very high failure rate ( on line training once you have been selected and resigned)

Good luck , dont blame you for wanting to change though. It is a risk.
fourgolds is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2009, 07:54
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Somewhere far far away
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just wanna say, from what I know, Korean Airlines's 2008 B777 training washout rate on 2 classes were 90% and 100%. Sometimes I just wonder why experienced pilots got washout in KE...

anyways, good luck with KE.
radioactive540 is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2009, 10:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know why there is such a high failure rate? I'm thinking of going as a non-rated 330 capt, but a don't want to pay for a rating if there's a high risk of being chopped during line training!!
Mactor is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2009, 11:56
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: alcatraz
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is obvious non-rated pilots are subjected to a higher failure rate than type-rated pilots in KAL. Of course a non-rated pilot will take some time to settle down in a new aircraft type compared to one who is type-experienced.
KAL is not in the business of retaining anyone is is not up to their standard, regardless of experience level. Afterall, the rating is at your expense ... it doesn't cost KAL a cent. So if you are new on type, it's going to be tough trying to impress.
minibus330 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 10:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, Wigtownshire
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bluewater, I think what you are referring to is the option3/4 as KAL call it, this gives 2 times 7 days off per month at your home base, however there are limited bases available and at the moment AKL does not appear on the list. It is unwritten, you can request but no promises if your base is listed. Basically you would operate ICN-wherever-ICN twice a month with 7 days off at the base because you are already operating there twice a month you would be very unlikely to get another trip there on the days you are back in ICN. This system works much better for most people if you are lucky enough to have your base as one of those on offer, however for the 777 it is currently only Sao Paulo and YVR was also on the list but I believe it may have been removed. Sorry this doesnt help but at least you know. For anyone else interested the only other aircraft available for this at the moment is the B744 and the bases listed on the last request from KAL were LAX,SYD.FRA,CDG,LHR but there may be more someone may be able to add to this. Remember that this wont be written in the contract and it is purely at KAL's discretion but so far they have been very good on it. The two blocks of 7 days are allocated by KAL, you can request days but no promises, however if you require specific days off you can switch back to normal scheduling as you require on a month by month basis so very flexible provided it is not during the main holiday times.
johntrav69 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 13:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 60
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Howdy BW,
KAL is way different than EK to fly for. Professionally I found EK much better, but in the end life in the UAE with EK forced me to jump to KAL. Commuting to OZ is working well but it is still a long time away from home each month.
The bases for the 7 off 10 on (or whatever you end up with) change every time there is a seasonal equipment change. Last month there was an A330 Syd basing this month it is an 747 basing, hopefully in Jan or Feb it may be an 777.
Do not plan your career move on this basing policy, they are good if you can get them but they are not contractual or permanent.
ShockWave is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 14:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 60
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mactor re the KAL failure rate....the following is pasted from what I wrote on another thread because I am to lazy to start again.

An OIC attitude will be much better than a confrontational one, but is absolutely no guarantee of a problem free existence thru line training.
It is not simply a matter of keeping your head down, there are numerous politics and other unusual frictions involved.
I know of no DECs who have had a ripple free transition into KAL and I am working for KAL. Some get thru with less drama than others, but it is never easy.
You will have at least two line training capts. One will do most of your training. You may also end up with having many different guys. If just one guy writes something bad the others will not have the balls to then say something good. They run very scared of being responsible for their actions. Rightly or wrongly they believe that every moment you are employed by KAL they can be held responsible for your actions throughout your career. It is very much easier for them to write bad things about you than good, that way they can cover their backside if someone fails you or you are involved in an incident later.
There are not enough Korean pilots to employ as first officers, so expat FOs seem to have no difficulties during training especially as they will not be given an opportunity to upgrade. There is very little or no resentment towards them.
DECs are viewed and treated very differently.

The KAL training department currently struggles to control what occurs during LT to foreign Captains. A380 DEC training will be an absolute nightmare for anyone if it ever happens.

Also, the successful completion of line training is not an end to the possibility of being screwed with. For some it never ends.
ShockWave is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 14:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: MALAYSIA
Age: 46
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bit off topic, SW, has there been any 777 FO employed yet? Heard that they failed every FO who comes..
azlee_19 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 22:57
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, Wigtownshire
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SW, remember that some of the bases run on the 744 even though the pax may be different so for instance, SYD has been on this option for a long time due to the fact that the freighter runs non stop through the year even though the pax a/c may change due to seasonal demand. Not that this helps of course if you are 777 but of interest nonetheless i am sure for some.
johntrav69 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 23:02
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles, Wigtownshire
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
azlee_19,
Trust me no 777 fo should come unless they have no job, no command decreed by the CAA of Korea and they dont change for 2.5 years and even then it may not change so dead end there absolutely no questions... for now LOL. I wouldnt say you have been warned I would go so far as to say you have been told. Ask any FO in the company where their career prospects lie and it wont be in KAL, shame really.
johntrav69 is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 04:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: uae
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What are the contract companies telling FO's about upgrades? It's not going to happen and as johntrav69 has said , you have been told.
Basings are one thing and so are the rosters but you have been sold a line if you think you will upgrade at KAL. Good luck to those who need a job, thats different.
fatbus is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 05:17
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Moe's
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
What would be the best agency to go through for a B737NG captain?
flamingmoe is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 08:47
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: MALAYSIA
Age: 46
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SW, i don't have a job, thats why. Have they employed any 777 fo?
azlee_19 is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2009, 09:11
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 60
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am yet to meet any 777 f/o trainees, but have heard they will be here soon.
So not sure really.
You will not be a threat to anyones eventual upgrade so do not see many problems with the job. The expat f/os I know here seam to get on fine and probably complain a lot less than other airlines I have worked at.
As a short term job prospect, I think it could be worthwhile depending on personal circumstances. Longer term, depending on your situation, the sandpit is probably better for upgrade etc.
ShockWave is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2009, 04:19
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Moe's
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Direct from the contracting agency, 10 days on/8 off doesn't exist, this is a figment of someone's over-active imagination...sure would be nice though!
flamingmoe is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2009, 06:42
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: uae
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
8 on 6 off did exist out of YVR on the 777 for awhile, like someone has already said that sort of thing changes to suit the company
fatbus is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2009, 21:30
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evening all,

Sorry to take this topic a little further from the current sunject, but I couldn't find any other relavant threads.

I am shortly to be made redundant from my Airline in the UK as an F/O with 737/757/767 timeand long haul etc. I am currently considering the Korean contract, chiefly for 737 as I am current on type, but I am interested in the 777. I would appreciate your views on the life style of this contract, whether I would be wise to stick my neck out for a 777 rating or stick with the 737? I am looking at this job as short term ( 3 years max) so upgrade is irrelevant, I just want to keep my head down try and save some cash and get back into a UK Airline when things pick up. I would also appreciate any info on the interview.


Cheers!
frozenpilot is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2009, 03:27
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: uae
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After the 3 years at KAL what would be your plans? Staying on the 73 you might be able to find a Capt position but that would not likely be avail on the 777. 73 flying out of SEL would be alot of work but great experience, you might find a slightly larger number of expat Capt's as well
fatbus is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2009, 05:25
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with fatbus...stick with the 737.
That airplane is now what the 707 was many years ago...IE: most everyone has one and positions are easier to find, promotion likely more rapid.
Best of luck.
411A is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.