Wikiposts
Search
South Asia and Far East Wannabes A forum for those applying to Cathay Pacific, Dragonair or any other Hong Kong-based airline or operator. Use this area for both Direct Entry Pilot and Cadet-scheme queries.

747 or 777 SO...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 23:30
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
747 or 777 SO...

pro's and cons for both please...?!!
VeroFlyer is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2012, 00:06
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're saying it like you will have a choice...

Not many more SO courses for the 400 these days. But to answer your question.
Pro 747: Good rest to EU with mostly based crews and everyone working on their body clocks.
Cons 747: The oldschool longsleevers are still here.

Pro 777: Fleet of choice (at the moment) good choice of destinations/layovers
Con 777: The oldschool longsleevers from the 400 are 'ticking the 777 box' before retirement.
Con 777 (all fleets): Terrible crew hotels.
A Scaler is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2012, 00:11
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Moved beyond
Posts: 1,174
Received 89 Likes on 50 Posts
747 - A great aircraft but now getting quite old with more and more problems appearing as time goes by. CX will start phasing out the 747 over the next few years, so the destinations will become more limited and when it comes time for upgrade you'll probably end up on the 777 anyway. Positives - can't really think of any,

777- an even better aircraft, a real pilot's machine with newer technology. The 777 will become the backbone of CX's long haul fleet as the 747 is phased out of service. Ultimately there will be a lot more variety in terms of destinations (if there isn't already). Negatives - can't think of any!
BuzzBox is online now  
Old 3rd Aug 2012, 01:51
  #4 (permalink)  
crwjerk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Comparing aircraft is irrelevant to S/O's as you wont touch them for at least 4 years until you possibly upgrade to F/O. The rest is correct regarding hotels, rest, destinations, old long-sleevers!!
 
Old 3rd Aug 2012, 05:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: anywhere the job offer is!
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The best thing about the 747, It has it's own toilet in the flight deck.
The worse thing, they're being phased out, so very limited destinations.
Gravox is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2012, 10:40
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks guys for your insights. I guess the 777 is the more popular. Do SO's operate on freighter flights as well?
VeroFlyer is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2012, 08:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: HK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
talk to any flying a CX Airbus and with the way they are currently getting worked I think you will quikly have your answer!
pands777 is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2012, 12:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Age: 47
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Joining now I think the airbus could be the best fleet to get onto. With the 350s on the way and the 777Fs arriving shortly by the time a new SO is an FO things could be very different. The best fleets swing from one to the other over a period of 5-10 years. Was the 400 then the Airbus and now the 777 has the best rosters.
SloppyJoe is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2012, 01:11
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, I disagree. CX only has 8 777F on order vs. over 60 total pax 777 with 50 300ERs for long haul. A350 will likely be quite delayed, and there are heaps of 330s flying short haul for a long time. Stay away from the 747.
cxorcist is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2012, 01:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Completely agree with Silburfuchs. Why not get the rating and time in the Whale before it is phased out on the pax side? You can always fly and enjoy the 777 for the rest of your career if you wish.

Who cares about the limited layovers on the 400/800 - again, you will get to most of those destinations in time on the other fleets. Regardless, I would absolutely want flight time in the 800F - but that is just me. Plus, as an SO, you won't get much actual flying anyway - you will either sit on the 777 or on the 747. But having that experience on the 747 will always be valued and memorable IMHO. Every 747 pilot I know valued that experience and that aircraft. You can always reflect back on that experience on the 747 as you skipper a 777 or A350 later in life.

I certainly don't fly for Cathay, but if I were in your position and if I had a choice, I'd personally would go with the Whale and enjoy that experience while it lasted...

Last edited by Iver; 2nd Sep 2012 at 04:13.
Iver is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.