PPRuNe Forums - Search Results
PPRuNe Forums

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Register
FAQ
Calendar
Wikiposts
Today's Posts
Search
Vendor Directory
Search: Posts Made By: mutt
Showing results 1 to 11 of 11
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Forum: Tech Log
31st Jul 2012, 18:06
Replies: 103
Views: 47,177
Posted By mutt

[img]http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8165/7685613988...

[img]http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8165/7685613988_629549fcfd_z.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/pprunemutt/7685613988/)


Oops, thats the problem of only using Jeppesen for my guesses!

I cant...
Forum: Tech Log
31st Jul 2012, 17:21
Replies: 103
Views: 47,177
Posted By mutt

aterpster, how about "immediate right turn at DER...

aterpster, how about "immediate right turn at DER to SHOLE and hold, max speed in turn 160 KIAS".

But based on the noise restrictions, we wouldn't be allowed in there anyway :)

Mutt
Forum: Tech Log
31st Jul 2012, 17:08
Replies: 103
Views: 47,177
Posted By mutt

Zeffy...... under 121, we would go straight ahead...

Zeffy...... under 121, we would go straight ahead and account for the obstacles in the flight path, if we didnt get sufficient operational weight doing that, we would design a single engine flight...
Forum: Tech Log
31st Jul 2012, 09:13
Replies: 103
Views: 47,177
Posted By mutt

Considering that FAR91 was written for FAR 23 and...

Considering that FAR91 was written for FAR 23 and FAR 25 aircraft, it stands to reason that they didn't cite climb gradients, however for those of us operating FAR 25 large aircraft, with safety...
Forum: Tech Log
27th Jul 2012, 14:52
Replies: 103
Views: 47,177
Posted By mutt

But more and more operators are starting to see...

But more and more operators are starting to see that value. Skky's reading of FAR91 might be correct, but the interpretation is not. Why is it that the Honeywell FMS has WAT climb limits under FAR91,...
Forum: Tech Log
25th Jul 2012, 15:36
Replies: 103
Views: 47,177
Posted By mutt

You also have to comply with ICAO annex 6, part...

You also have to comply with ICAO annex 6, part 2, chapter 5, as the USA didn't file any differences.

Mutt
Forum: Tech Log
25th Jul 2012, 15:19
Replies: 103
Views: 47,177
Posted By mutt

herewith is your psalm and verse.... FAR 25.121...

herewith is your psalm and verse.... FAR 25.121 Airworthiness



Mutt
Forum: Tech Log
26th Feb 2012, 15:02
Replies: 103
Views: 47,177
Posted By mutt

I presume you realise that this is an instant...

I presume you realise that this is an instant value and not a constant value, so you will achieve 2.4% at the start of the climb but it can be less at the end of the 2nd segment.... Surprised? So was...
Forum: Tech Log
26th Feb 2012, 13:43
Replies: 103
Views: 47,177
Posted By mutt

Got to disagree with you, if you cannot achieve...

Got to disagree with you, if you cannot achieve the required certification climb gradients you are climb limited, if you cannot clear obstacles in the takeoff flight path then you are obstacle...
Forum: Tech Log
18th Feb 2012, 14:06
Replies: 103
Views: 47,177
Posted By mutt

WHAT?????? Can you please supply a reference...

WHAT??????

Can you please supply a reference for this statement, start with your Jeppesen Manual.........

Aterpster is in FAA land...... :)

Mutt
Forum: Tech Log
18th Feb 2012, 05:25
Replies: 103
Views: 47,177
Posted By mutt

Aterpster, what do you consider to be the...

Aterpster, what do you consider to be the certification takeoff flight path, do you consider it to end at 1500 feet (Note, I know that he is in FAA land :))

Dariuszw How do you account for...
Showing results 1 to 11 of 11


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.