PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Wikiposts
Search
Search: Posts Made By: AerocatS2A
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Forum: Tech Log
16th Dec 2015, 11:11
Replies: 23
Views: 7,838
Posted By AerocatS2A

Yes, we would not be the major operator you are...

Yes, we would not be the major operator you are referring to but our OEI procedure is straight up the ILS to the NDB.
Forum: Tech Log
7th Dec 2015, 08:23
Replies: 23
Views: 7,838
Posted By AerocatS2A

If you maintained runway heading to 400' then...

If you maintained runway heading to 400' then direct to LATOP then at no time will you have flown a track of 358, so you aren't complying with the SID (and you'd have to ask, if that is the intention...
Forum: Tech Log
6th Dec 2015, 05:24
Replies: 23
Views: 7,838
Posted By AerocatS2A

Well you follow the chart. The chart initial...

Well you follow the chart. The chart initial track is within 15º of the runway track so as far as ICAO is concerned it is "straight ahead", i.e., there is no "turn" below 400', only a minor track...
Forum: Tech Log
6th Dec 2015, 04:19
Replies: 23
Views: 7,838
Posted By AerocatS2A

Read the rest of his post and you'll see it...

Read the rest of his post and you'll see it refutes your point.



So yes some FMS databases don't have turns or waypoints below 400', however the chart itself is the final authority and you do...
Forum: Tech Log
5th Dec 2015, 09:13
Replies: 23
Views: 7,838
Posted By AerocatS2A

If the procedure says climb on 358 to 400', then...

If the procedure says climb on 358 to 400', then that's what you do. If you were meant to climb on runway track to 400' then it would say that. What did your captain say about it?
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.