PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Search: Posts Made By: andyy
Showing results 1 to 18 of 18
Search took 0.00 seconds.
16th Jan 2023, 20:24
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

or maybe more than half the Hawk T2s with engine...

or maybe more than half the Hawk T2s with engine issues, to the extent that training pilots abroad is being investigated.
11th Nov 2010, 16:02
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

LO - the RN argued long and hard for CTOL JSF &...

LO - the RN argued long and hard for CTOL JSF & for the carrier to be equipped to handle them. The report landed on the Ministers desk & BAe & R-R were in the Ministers Office like a shot, arguing...
15th Oct 2010, 12:59
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

Dixie bear in mind that the military...

Dixie

bear in mind that the military actually wanted conventioanl take off & landing (with cats & traps) F35s right from the start. BAE & R-R threw their toys out of the pram & persuaded the...
10th Jul 2009, 13:20
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

Certainly CVF is planned for a 50 ye operational...

Certainly CVF is planned for a 50 ye operational life, and their are several ex RN carriers (and other ships) that are still supposed to be operational in other Navies. I'd argue that its not the...
30th Jun 2009, 13:38
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

Its just not that simple; its the weapon systems...

Its just not that simple; its the weapon systems and sensor integration that costs the big £ and that would all have to be new.

TBH, we might be better off with a few "Oceans", with a strengthened...
30th Jun 2009, 12:04
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

Yes, I can see us returning to an "not east of...

Yes, I can see us returning to an "not east of Suez" policy. Pity about the Falklands and Afghanistan. Damned inconvenient.

Nurse,
Quote: With the AWACS future you propose would it be...
30th Jun 2009, 08:52
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

And this report by defence experts for the...

And this report by defence experts for the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) has called for radical changes in British security and defence policy.

The think tank's report is basically a...
30th Jun 2009, 08:34
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

Personally I think that the Carriers will be...

Personally I think that the Carriers will be canned & with it JSF. The Harriers will be kept & the CVS will be refitted again (to keep the RN happy and some jobs for Babcock at Rosyth); Maybe fit...
4th Jun 2009, 15:29
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

If CGS is so concerned about needing more...

If CGS is so concerned about needing more infantry, and doesn't think we need "balanced forces" anymore, perhaps he'd like to tell all his Cavalry chums to lay up their tanks for good and convert to...
27th May 2009, 07:57
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

NaB, my mate is bright enough and experienced...

NaB, my mate is bright enough and experienced enough to understand the difference between C3I systems and combat systems and I have spent enough time writing IERs and trying to squeeze quart sized...
26th May 2009, 16:13
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

The C3I aspect of CV(F) is a very interesting...

The C3I aspect of CV(F) is a very interesting example of "requirement creep". I understand from a former member of the Sub-Navy Board that the original intention was for the ships to be simply...
1st Aug 2008, 15:03
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

I thought that the FN had decided that CDG was...

I thought that the FN had decided that CDG was too small, hence interest in CVF. That said, I am not sure why using several submarine reactors is a bad thing - I think (can't be bothered to check!)...
28th Jul 2008, 08:25
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

Work on the new reactor for the Vanguard...

Work on the new reactor for the Vanguard replacement has already started. Even so we can't buy an N Warhead "off the shelf" for a Trident upgrade or any other N deterrent system due to the N...
18th Jul 2008, 07:24
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

NaB, I obviously shouldn't take issue with the...

NaB, I obviously shouldn't take issue with the person that wrote the requirement but my info, whilst second hand, did come from 2 x 1*s who sat on the Sub Navy Board and discussed these issues ad...
17th Jul 2008, 11:05
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

NaB, I accept that I am talking about the...

NaB, I accept that I am talking about the original requirement up to about '98 but nevertheless that was what the budget was originally planned around. Increases in CVF budget since have been at the...
17th Jul 2008, 08:32
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

Quote: The only question is "will the UK buy...

Quote:

The only question is "will the UK buy the F-35B? Probably, as they are to be purchased for BOTH carrier and RAF land-based use... less than half are earmarked for regular use on CVF.

B....
16th Jul 2008, 09:53
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

"designed for" was probably a bit strong but it...

"designed for" was probably a bit strong but it will carry them:

RAF - F-35 (Joint Strike Fighter) (http://www.raf.mod.uk/equipment/f35jointstrikefighter.cfm)
15th Jul 2008, 14:40
Replies: 7,449
Views: 2,396,225
Posted By andyy

I can't be bothered to trawl through all the...

I can't be bothered to trawl through all the pages of this thread so some of the following may be a repetition of others work, sorry, but to be honest, I'll still be amazed if we ever see these ships...
Showing results 1 to 18 of 18


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.