PPRuNe Forums - Search Results
PPRuNe Forums

Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page >

Search Results

Register
FAQ
Calendar
Wikiposts
Today's Posts
Search
Vendor Directory
Search: Posts Made By: SLF3
Showing results 1 to 7 of 7
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Forum: Rumours & News
2nd Dec 2019, 15:53
Replies: 115
Views: 111,128
Posted By SLF3

767, a few decades of ETOPS 180 service. ...

767, a few decades of ETOPS 180 service.
Performance standard 1 IFSD in 50,000 flights.
777, a new design with new and bigger engines approved for ETOPS 180 based on 1,000 flights prior to entry...
Forum: Rumours & News
2nd Dec 2019, 07:39
Replies: 115
Views: 111,128
Posted By SLF3

I think it was agreed to by the FAA under...

I think it was agreed to by the FAA under pressure from Boeing for commercial reasons. That was a commonly held view at the time. EASA certainly thought so, since they did not accept the special...
Forum: Rumours & News
1st Dec 2019, 08:25
Replies: 115
Views: 111,128
Posted By SLF3

I think you continue to make my case for me....

I think you continue to make my case for me. ‘Special conditions’ is by definition an exception or modification of the rules. The net effect of the special condition was a significant commercial...
Forum: Rumours & News
29th Nov 2019, 22:04
Replies: 115
Views: 111,128
Posted By SLF3

The rules were ETOPS 180 after one year in...

The rules were ETOPS 180 after one year in service at ETOPS 120. FAA certified the 777 at 180 from day 1, not accepted by EASA. I note you have 30 years with Boeing. You are likely a lot more...
Forum: Rumours & News
29th Nov 2019, 18:31
Replies: 115
Views: 111,128
Posted By SLF3

Look at "ETOPS 180 at introduction" in the link...

Look at "ETOPS 180 at introduction" in the link below. I'm not arguing that ETOPS was a mistake. Simply that the FAA bent the rules for commercial reasons to support the 777.
...
Forum: Rumours & News
29th Nov 2019, 15:15
Replies: 115
Views: 111,128
Posted By SLF3

That's kind of my point,. It was ETOPS out of the...

That's kind of my point,. It was ETOPS out of the box.....

The FAA changed the rules to suit Boeing.
Forum: Rumours & News
29th Nov 2019, 12:05
Replies: 115
Views: 111,128
Posted By SLF3

I think the rot (regulatory capture) started in...

I think the rot (regulatory capture) started in the FAA when they fast tracked ETOPS approval for the 777 to take out competition from the A340.

So its not since the 777: the 777 started it.
Showing results 1 to 7 of 7


 
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.