PPRuNe Forums - Search Results

Search: Posts Made By: safetypee

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took 0.00 seconds.

Forum: Tech Log

8th Feb 2016, 13:28

Replies: 17

Dispatch V inflight

Views: 18,913

Posted By safetypee

Mansfield, thanks for the additional explanation....

Mansfield, thanks for the additional explanation.
I agree with your interpretations of the data, but it might be worth checking with Boeing for TALPA confirmation.

Re non effect of reverse;...

Forum: Tech Log

5th Feb 2016, 17:35

Replies: 17

Dispatch V inflight

Views: 18,913

Posted By safetypee

Mansfield, an interesting analysis; like donstim...

Mansfield, an interesting analysis; like donstim I suspect that the problems, if any, are in the assumptions – yours, the operator, the regulator.

You refer to the performance manual for...

Forum: Tech Log

3rd Feb 2016, 08:32

Replies: 17

Dispatch V inflight

Views: 18,913

Posted By safetypee

LeadSled (#9) I prefer to use 'requirement'...

LeadSled (#9) I prefer to use 'requirement' opposed to ‘legal’; requirements can either have a legal or advisory basis.

I agree that the requirement for the minimum landing field length is 60%,...

Forum: Tech Log

1st Feb 2016, 11:36

Replies: 17

Dispatch V inflight

Views: 18,913

Posted By safetypee

LeadSled, I have difficulty following your points...

LeadSled, I have difficulty following your points on required length and differences between AFM and Ops Manual/FOCM/QRH data.

Is required length being intermixed with achievable/actual length? ...

Forum: Tech Log

29th Jan 2016, 14:47

Replies: 17

Dispatch V inflight

Views: 18,913

Posted By safetypee

This has been debated many times before with a...

This has been debated many times before with a range of views, transatlantic and EASA operators.
I wonder if it is reinterpreted against EASA’s IR-OPS there would be any revised views.
...

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5